Defence Policy

Cost Effective Defence - Lewis Page Writes for the Economic Research Council
Economic research does not sound very thrilling but given the reality that the average Englishman has some 80% of his income stolen by the taxman then wasted, he should be taking a very serious interest in whether he is getting value for money. To say the very obvious, he is not.

Lewis Page says that we have a decent defence establishment despite the corruption of senior officers in the Ministry of Defence and and an even worse monopoly manufacturer who cannot even make a profit let alone a decent rifle. I am not arguing for a moment.

British Armed Forces Should Defend Britain Not Serve The New World Order
QUOTE
The current Government dithering over what cuts should be made to our already distorted and overstretched  armed forces  is taking place not in the context of what we need to defend Britain and her interests,  but by asking  how the cuts  can be made to allow the dangerous and  destructive fantasy which has been taken hold of British politicians for several decades – that Britain can perform  the  quasi-imperial role of  bringing  ”enlightenment”  in the form of  political correctness to the benighted natives - to  be sustained.

What Britain needs, as every state does, are armed forces to defend its territory and to intervene abroad when a vital British interest is at stake.  The article below (which was published by Right Now! in the summer of 2004) attempts to define what such armed forces should be and give a broad defence strategy which goes beyond the armed forces.

Armed  forces  to defend Britain not to serve the  New  World  Order (NWO)
UNQUOTE
Blair is utterly corrupt, a traitor who should be hanged. This is not to say that Brown is not worse or that Cameron is any better.

 

Nuclear Submarines And Trident
Does England need another generation of nukes? Yes! Why? Lewis Page explains all.