These excerpts may be more useful than the version from Radio Islam. The source is The Birdman
Excerpts From JEWISH HISTORY, JEWISH RELIGION (1994)
p.20
.... The first book on Jewish history proper (dealing with ancient
times) was promptly banned and suppressed by the highest rabbinical authorities,
and did not reappear before the 19th century. The rabbinical authorities of east
Europe furthermore decreed that all non-Talmudic studies are to be forbidden,
even when nothing specific could be found in them which merits anathema, because
they encroach on the time that should be employed either in studying the Talmud
or in making money - which should be used to subsidise talmudic scholars. Only
one loophole was left, namely the time that even a pious Jew must perforce spend
in the privy. In that unclean place sacred studies are forbidden, and it was
therefore permitted to read history there, provided it was written in Hebrew and
was completely secular, which in effect meant that it must be exclusively
devoted to non-Jewish subjects. (One can imagine that those few Jews of that
time who - no doubt tempted by Satan - developed an interest in the history of
the French kings were constantly complaining to their neighbours about the
constipation they were suffering from ...) As a consequence, two hundred years
ago the vast majority of Jews were totally in the dark not only about the
existence of America but also about Jewish history and Jewry's contemporary
state; and they were quite content to remain so.
pp 42-47
The Dispensations
As noted above, the talmudic system is most dogmatic and does not allow any relaxation of its rules even when they are reduced to absurdity by a change in circumstances. And in the case of the Talmud - contrary to that of the Bible - the literal sense of the text is binding, and one is not allowed to interpret it away. But in the period of classical Judaism various talmudic laws became untenable for the Jewish ruling classes - the rabbis and the rich. In the interest of these ruling classes, a method of systematic deception was devised for keeping the letter of the law, while violating its spirit and intention. It was this hypocritical system of 'dispensations' (heterini) which, in my view, was the most important cause of the debasement of Judaism in its classical epoch. (The second cause was Jewish mysticism, which however operated for a much shorter period of time.) Again, some examples are needed to illustrate how the system works.
1 Taking of interest. The Talmud strictly forbids a Jew, on pain of severe punishment, to take interest on a loan made to another Jew. (According to a majority of talmudic authorities, it is a religious duty to take as much interest as possible on a loan made to a Gentile.) Very detailed rules forbid even the most far-fetched forms in which a Jewish lender might benefit from a Jewish debtor. All Jewish accomplices to such an illicit transaction, including the scribe and the witnesses, are branded by the Talmud as infamous persons, disqualified from testifying in court, because by participating in such an act a Jew as good as declares that 'he has no part in the god of Israel'. It is evident that this law is well suited to the needs of Jewish peasants or artisans, or of small Jewish communities who use their money for lending to non-Jews. But the situation was very different in east Europe (mainly in Poland) by the 16th century. There was a relatively big Jewish community, which constituted the majority in many towns. The peasants, subjected to strict serfdom not far removed from slavery, were hardly in a position to borrow at all, while lending to the nobility was the business of a few very rich Jews. Many Jews were doing business with each other.
In these circumstances, the following arrangement (called heter 'isqa - 'business dispensation') was devised for an interest-bearing loan between Jews, which does not violate the letter of the law, because formally it is not a loan at all. The lender 'invests' his money in the business of the borrower, stipulating two conditions. First, that the borrower will pay the lender at an agreed future date a stated sum of money (in reality, the interest in the loan) as the lender's 'share in the profits'. Secondly, that the borrower will be presumed to have made sufficient profit to give the lender his share, unless a claim to the contrary is corroborated by the testimony of the town's rabbi or rabbinical judge, etc, who, by arrangement, refuse to testify in such cases. In practice all that is required is to take a text of this dispensation, written in Aramaic and entirely incomprehensible to the great majority, and put it on a wall of the room where the transaction is made (a copy of this text is displayed in all branches of Israeli banks) or even to keep it in a chest - and the interest-bearing loan between Jews becomes perfectly legal and blameless.
2 The sabbatical year. According to talmudic law (based on 1 Leviticus, 25) Jewish-owned land in Palestine must be left fallow every seventh ('sabbatical') year, when all agricultural work (including harvesting) on such land is forbidden. There is ample evidence that this law was rigorously observed for about one thousand years, from the 5th century BC till the disappearance of Jewish agriculture in Palestine. Later, when there was no occasion to apply the law in practice, it was kept theoretically intact. However, in the 1880s, with the establishment of the first Jewish agricultural colonies in Palestine, it became a matter of practical concern. Rabbis sympathetic to the settlers helpfully devised a dispensation, which was later perfected by their successors in the religious Zionist parties and has become an established Israeli practice.
This is how it works. Shortly before a sabbatical year, the Israeli Minister of Internal Affairs gives the Chief Rabbi a document making him the legal owner of all Israeli land, both private and public. Armed with this paper, the Chief Rabbi goes to a non-Jew and sells him all the land of Israel (and, since 1967, the Occupied Territories) for a nominal sum. A separate document stipulates that the 'buyer' will 'resell' the land back after the year is over. And this transaction is repeated every seven years, usually with the same 'buyer'.
Non-Zionist rabbis do not recognize the validity of this dispensation claiming correctly that, since religious law forbids Jews to sell land in Palestine to Gentiles, the whole transaction is based on a sin and hence null and void. The Zionist rabbis reply, however, that what is forbidden is a real sale, not a fictitious one!
3 Milking on the Sabbath. This has been forbidden in post-talmudic times, through the process of increasing religious severity mentioned above. The ban could easily be kept in the Diaspora, since Jews who had cows of their own were usually rich enough to have non-Jewish servants, who could be ordered (using one of the subterfuges described below) to do the milking. The early Jewish colonists in Palestine employed Arabs for this and other purposes, but with the forcible imposition of the Zionist policy of exclusive Jewish labour there was need, for a dispensation. (This was particularly important before the introduction of mechanised milking in the late 1950s.) Here too there was a difference between Zionist and non-Zionist rabbis.
According to the former, the forbidden milking becomes permitted provided the milk is not white but dyed blue. This blue Saturday milk is then used exclusively for making cheese, and the dye is washed off into the whey. Non-Zionist rabbis have devised a much subtler scheme (which I personally witnessed operating in a religious kibbutz in 1952). They discovered an old provision which allows the udders of a cow to be emptied on the Sabbath, purely for relieving the suffering caused to the animal by bloated udders, and on the strict condition that the milk runs to waste on the ground. Now, this is what is actually done: on Saturday morning, a pious kibbutznik goes to the cowshed and places pails under the cows. (There is no ban on such work in the whole of the talmudic literature.) He then goes to the synagogue to pray. Then comes his colleague, whose 'honest intention' is to relieve the animals' pain and let their milk run to the floor. But if, by chance, a pail happens to be standing there, is he under any obligation to remove it? Of course not. He simply 'ignores' the pails, fulfills his mission of mercy and goes to the synagogue. Finally a third pious colleague goes into the cowshed and discovers, to his great surprise, the pails full of milk. So he puts them in cold storage and follows his comrades to the synagogue. Now all is well, and there is no need to waste money on blue dye.
4 Mixed crops. Similar dispensations were issued by Zionist rabbis in respect of the ban (based on Leviticus, 19:19) against sowing two different species of crop in the same field. Modern agronomy has however shown that in some cases (especially in growing fodder) mixed sowing is the most profitable. The rabbis invented, a dispensation according to which one man sows the field length-wise with one kind of seed, and later that day his comrade, who! 'does not know' about the former, sows another kind of seed crosswise. However, this method was felt to be too wasteful of labour, and a better one was devised: one man makes a heap of; one kind of seed in a public place and carefully covers it with a sack or piece of board. The second kind of seed is then put on top of the cover. Later, another man comes and exclaims, in front of witnesses, 'I need this sack (or board)' and removes it, so that the seeds mix 'naturally'. Finally, a third man comes along and is told, 'Take this and sow the field," which he proceeds to do.
5 Leavened substances must not be eaten or even kept in the
possession of a Jew during the seven (or, outside Palestine, eight) days of
Passover. The concept 'leavened substances' was continually broadened and the
aversion to so much as seeing them during the festival approached hysteria. They
include all kinds of flour and even unground grain. In the original talmudic
society this was bearable, because bread (leavened or not) was usually baked
once a week; a peasant family would use the last of the previous year's grain to
bake unleavened bread for the festival, which ushers in the new harvest season.
However, in the conditions of post-Talmudic European Jewry the observance was
very hard on a middle-class Jewish family and even more so on a corn merchant. A
dispensation was therefore devised, by which all those substances are sold in a
fictitious sale to a Gentile before the festival and bought back automatically
after it. The one thing that must be done is to lock up the taboo substances for
the duration of the festival. In Israel this fictitious sale has been made more
efficient. Religious Jews 'sell' their leavened substances to their local
rabbis, who in turn 'sell' them to the Chief Rabbis; the latter sell them to a
Gentile, and by a special dispensation this sale is presumed to include also the
leavened substances of non-practising Jews.
6 Sabbath-Goy. Perhaps the most developed dispensations concern the 'Goy (Gentile) of Sabbath'. As mentioned above, the range of tasks banned on the Sabbath has widened continually; but the range of tasks that must be carried out or supervised to satisfy needs or to increase comfort also keeps widening. This is particularly true in modern times, but the effect of technological change began to be felt long ago. The ban against grinding on the Sabbath was a relatively light matter for a Jewish peasant or artisan, say in second-century Palestine, who used a hand mill for domestic purposes. It was quite a different matter for a tenant of a water mill or windmill - one of the most common Jewish occupations in eastern Europe. But even such a simple human 'problem' as the wish to have a hot cup of tea on a Saturday afternoon becomes much greater with the tempting samovar, used regularly on weekdays, standing in the room. These are just two examples out of a very large number of so-called 'problems of Sabbath observance'. And one can state with certainty that for a community composed exclusively of Orthodox Jews they were quite insoluble, at least during the last eight or ten centuries, without the 'help' of non-Jews. This is even more true today in the 'Jewish state", because many public services, such as water, gas and electricity, fall in this category. Classical Judaism could not exist even for a whole week without using some non-Jews. But without special dispensations there is a great obstacle in employing non-Jews to do these Saturday jobs; for talmudic regulations forbid Jews to ask a Gentile to do on the Sabbath any work which they themselves are banned from doing. I shall describe two of the many types of dispensation used for such purposes.
First, there is the method of 'hinting', which depends on the casuistic logic according to which a sinful demand becomes blameless if it is phrased slyly. As rule, the hint must be 'obscure', but in cases of extreme need a 'clear' hint is allowed. For example, in a recent booklet on religious observance for the use of Israeli soldiers, the latter are taught how to talk to Arab workers employed by the army as Sabbath-Goyim. In urgent cases, such as when it is very cold and a fire must be lit, or when light is needed for a religious service, a pious Jewish soldier may use a 'clear' hint and tell the Arab: 'It is cold (or dark) here'. But normally an 'obscure' hint must suffice, for example: 'It would be more pleasant if it were warmer here.'20 This method of 'hinting' is particularly repulsive and degrading inasmuch as it is normally used on non-Jews who, due to their poverty or subordinate social position, are wholly in the power of their Jewish employer. A Gentile servant (or employee of the Israeli army) who does not train himself to interpret 'obscure hints' as orders will be pitilessly dismissed.
The second method is used in cases where what the Gentile is required to do on Saturday is not an occasional task or personal service, which can be 'hinted' at as the need arises, but a routine or regular job without constant Jewish supervision. According to this method - called 'implicit inclusion' (havla'ah) of the Sabbath among weekdays - the Gentile is hired 'for the whole week (or year)', without the Sabbath being so much as mentioned in the contract. But in reality work is only performed on the Sabbath. This method was used in the past in hiring a Gentile to put out the candles in the synagogue after the Sabbath-eve prayer (rather than wastefully allowing them to burn out). Modern Israeli examples are: regulating the water supply or watching over water reservoirs on Saturdays.
A similar idea is used also in the case of Jews, but for a different
end. Jews are forbidden to receive any payment for work done on the Sabbath,
even if the work itself is permitted. The chief example here concerns the sacred
professions: the rabbi or talmudic scholar who preaches or teaches on the
Sabbath, the cantor who sings only on Saturdays and other holy days (on which
similar bans apply), the sexton and similar officials. In talmudic times, and in
some countries even several centuries after, such jobs were unpaid. But later,
when these became salaried professions, the dispensation of 'implicit inclusion'
was used, and they were hired on a 'monthly' or 'yearly' basis. In the case of
rabbis and talmudic scholars the problem is particularly complicated, because
the Talmud forbids them to receive any payment for preaching, teaching or
studying talmudic matters even on weekdays.22 For them an additional
dispensation stipulates that their salary is not really a salary at all but
'compensation for idleness' (dmey batalah). As a combined result of these two
fictions, what is in reality payment for work done mainly, or even solely, on
the Sabbath is transmogrified into payment for being idle on weekdays.
Social Aspects of Dispensations
Two social features of these and many similar practices deserve special mention.
First, a dominant feature of this system of dispensations, and of classical Judaism inasmuch as it is based on them, is deception - deception primarily of God, if this word can be used for an imaginary being so easily deceived by the rabbis, who consider themselves cleverer than him. No greater contrast can be conceived than that between the God of the Bible (particularly of the greater prophets) and of the God of classical Judaism. The latter is more like the early Roman Jupiter, who was likewise bamboozled by his worshippers, or the gods described in Frazer's Golden Bough.
Ethical
Status:-
From the ethical point of view, classical Judaism represents a
process of degeneration, which is still going on; and this degeneration into a
tribal collection of empty rituals and magic superstitions has very important
social and political consequences. For it must be remembered that it is
precisely the superstitions of classical Judaism which have the greatest hold on
the Jewish masses ....
[Birdman comment: Can anyone fathom where Jews might have obtained their propensity for lying and cheating?]
Freedom isn't free!
To insure the continuation of this website and the survival of its creator in
these financially-troubled times,
please send donations
directly to the Birdman at
PO Box 66683, St Pete Beach FL 33736-6683
"The smallest good deed is worth the grandest intention."
Please contribute
today - buy our books - and spread the word to all your friends!
Remember: Your donation = our survival!
* * * Back to the Home Page of John "Birdman" Bryant, the World's Most Controversial Author * * *