Jews Condemn Donald Trump's Deportation Plan
but
Jews Back Israel's Total Exclusion Policy

You might think that if Jews want Immigration there is a reason. They do major political manipulating to inflict Third World aliens on England and Western Civilization generally. But they do not want them in Israel. The New Observer does not merely say so; it proves it using multiple sources. More and better details are at Jews Condemn Donald Trump's Deportation Plan But Back Israel's Total Exclusion Policy. The point of using Ethnic Fouling In England and Ethnic Fouling generally is to create Trojan Horses filled with the foot soldiers that will be used to destroy England, to leave it as a province of the New World Order run by Zionist crazies.

 

Jews Condemn Donald Trump's Deportation Plan But Back Israel's Total Exclusion Policy


QUOTE by |

All the major Jewish activist groups in America—including the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) and the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society (HIAS)—have come out in opposition to the new deportation guidelines announced by the Trump administration—but continue to back Israel’s deportation rules, which are far stricter and openly racial in nature.

The new Trump administration rules, announced February 21, directed his administration to enforce the nation’s immigration laws more aggressively, unleashing the full force of the federal government to find, arrest, and deport those in the country illegally, regardless of whether they have committed serious crimes.

The aim of the new orders are to publicize crimes by illegal invaders, enlist local police officers as enforcers, erect new detention facilities, discourage asylum seekers, and speed up deportations.

According to an article in the Jerusalem-based Times of Israel, titled “US Jewish organizations decry new immigration rules as ‘cruel,’ ‘dangerous,’” the head of the ADL, Jonathan Greenblatt, announced that the “new rules are extremely ill-advised and counter to our values as a nation that has always served as a beacon of hope for people around the world.”

Mark Hetfield, president of HIAS, an organization which the Times of Israel described as a “Jewish refugee rights group,” said that the guidelines “treat vulnerable people, many of whom are unaccompanied children and asylum seekers, like criminals.”

“This step is deeply problematic on many levels. It removes critical due process rights for new immigrants and imperils countless numbers of refugees fleeing extreme violence in Central America,” the ADL statement said.

The HIAS statement said it “remains committed to fighting this and every action that endangers the lives of refugees and asylum seekers, and that jeopardizes their ability to obtain the protection they need and deserve.

“Our history and values, as Jews and as Americans, compel us to continue fighting to preserve the American traditions of welcoming and of providing refuge.”

The HIAS statement added: “Prioritizing detention and removal over protection and due process is not only cruel, it is dangerous. Such detention and deportation without due process would violate US obligations under the Refugee Convention, and put the most vulnerable at risk of being summarily returned to countries where they would face persecution and torture.”

Both the ADL and HIAS fanatically support the state of Israel, which openly breaks every single one of the Refugee Convention rules to which Hetfield referred.

The ADL, for example, has a special section on its website devoted to instructing Jews how to defend Israel from criticism. Titled “Israel: A Guide for Activists,” the ADL page provides detailed instructions on every aspect of the Jewish state, and how to answer accusations made against it.

HIAS has an office in Israel which it uses to facilitate Jews-only immigration to Israel, and proudly announces that it has a program to help Third World non-Jewish “asylum seekers” in Israel to “evaluate options for reuniting with family in other countries, including the United States, Canada, Italy, Australia, Switzerland, and Sweden”—in other words, to get non-Jewish illegal invaders out of Israel and to send them to non-Jewish countries.

As for Israel itself, the Jewish ethnostate actively deports thousands of Eritrean and other nonwhite invaders back to Africa—and has accepted just four “asylum” requests since 2009.

Israel’s deportation policy is so forthright that it even deports thousands of Africans to Uganda and Rwanda—regardless of the Africans’ original country of origin.

As to treating invaders like “criminals,” HIAS has also ignored the fact that in February 2016, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced his intention to “surround all of Israel with a fence” to pprotect the Jewish state from Arab “wild beasts.”

The ADL and HIAS also ignore the fact that the Israeli government not only denies non-Jewish “refugees” asylum status—a move which bars them from obtaining work permits, healthcare, and welfare services—but also locks them up without trial in specially built concentration camps such as those found in Holot, hidden away in the Negev desert, far away from Israel’s cities.

Above and below: Holot concentration camp, where the ADL and HIAS-supported Israel keeps its non-Jewish “refugees” before deporting them.

A BBC article from February 2016, for example, titled “Israel’s unwanted African migrants,,” reveals that the Jewish ethnostate offers any “refugees” who reach that nation one of three choices: go home; stay in Israel, but be imprisoned indefinitely; or accept deportation to a “third country”—which means deportation to Rwanda or Uganda.

From this overview, it is obvious that Israel has far more stringent invasion control policies than the Trump administration’s latest plans—and it is equally clear that the ADL, IAS, and all the other Jewish organizations who are protesting the Trump administration, are blatant hypocrites who seek to enforce one rule of conduct for the Jewish state, and another completely contrary rule for non-Jewish states.
UNQUOTE
Even the BBC is telling the truth about Zionist crazies hating blacks. The LA Times is telling it like it is even though Hollywood is run by Jews - see One Country That Won't Be Taking Refugees Israel. Albeit BBC Watch Alleges That The BBC Is Lying

 

Breaking The Silence ex Wiki
Breaking The Silence (BtS) (Hebrew: Shovrim Shtika) is an Israeli Non-Governmental Organization (NGO), located in a western section of Jerusalem, established by Israel Defense Forces (IDF) soldiers and veterans who collect and provide testimonies about their military service in the West Bank, Gaza Strip, and East Jerusalem since the Second Intifada, giving serving and discharged Israeli personnel and reservists a platform to confidentially describe their experience in the Israeli-occupied territories. J.J. Goldberg described it in The Jewish Daily Forward as a "left-wing soldiers' protest organization".[1] This profile, it has been argued, does not fit the variegated demographic or ideological composition of the group.[2]

The organization's stated mission is to 'break the silence' of IDF soldiers who return to civilian life in Israel and "discover the gap between the reality which they encountered in the [occupied] territories, and the silence which they encounter at home".[3][4] Since 2004, Breaking the Silence has run a testimonies collection project called "Soldiers Speak Out". They have collected several hundred testimonies from "those who have, during their service in the IDF, the Border Guard, and the Security Forces, played a role in the Occupied Territories". By publishing soldiers' accounts, Breaking the Silence hopes to "force Israeli society to address the reality which it created" and face the truth about "abuse towards Palestinians, looting, and destruction of property" that is familiar to soldiers.[5]

The organization was criticized for providing anonymous testimonies which are unverifiable and exploiting them for propaganda,[6] having a clear political agenda so it cannot be described as 'human rights organization'[7] and promoting Anti-Israeli lawfare.[8] Some senior figures in the Israel Defense and Security establishment have defended the organization. Amiram Levin has stated that 'Breaking the Silence strengthens the I.D.F. and its morality.'[9]

 

Purity of Arms ex Wiki
The code of purity of arms (Hebrew: Tohar HaNeshek) is one of the values stated in the Israel Defense Forces' official doctrine of ethics, The Spirit of the IDF.

According to Rabbi Norman Solomon, the concepts of Havlaga and purity of arms arise out of the ethical and moral values stemming from the tradition of Israel, extrapolation from the Jewish Halakha, and the desire for moral approval and hence political support from the world community.[1] Despite doubts when confronted by indiscriminate terrorism, purity of arms remains the guiding rule for the Israeli forces.[1] These foundations have elicited a fair degree of consensus among Jews, both religious and secular.[1]

Others have challenged this image,[2][3] but according to Gideon Levy, the "majority of the Israelis is still deeply convinced that their army, the IDF, is the most moral army of the world, and nothing else".[4] A notable proponent of this image is Colonel Richard Kemp, a retired British army officer, who called the IDF the most moral army in the world on Israel's Channel 2 News.[5] The High Level Military Group, composed of military experts from Australia, Colombia, France, Germany, India, Italy, The United Kingdom, the United States, and Spain, released an assessment on Operation Protective Edge acknowledging Israel made "unprecedented efforts" to avoid civilian casualties exceeding international standards.

 

BBC Watch Alleges That The BBC Is Lying - Believe It If You Want
QUOTE
Three inaccuracies and an omission in one BBC News sentence
The sentence below is to be found in an article published on the BBC News website’s Middle East page on May 8th:

“In October last year, an Eritrean immigrant was shot and beaten to death by an angry crowd after being mistaken for an Arab militant in the town of Beersheba, prompting concern about mob reactions to people thought to be suspicious.”

Habtom Zerhom was not an “immigrant” but an Eritrean asylum seeker. The investigation into the incident showed that the cause of his death was internal bleeding from a gunshot wound – i.e. he was not “beaten to death” as claimed by the BBC. The incident occurred when Zerhom was mistaken for a second terrorist – not an “Arab militant” – during a terror attack at Be’er Sheva bus station on October 18th 2015 which is completely erased from this portrayal of events.

In addition to those omissions and inaccuracies, the link provided leads to a BBC report from October 2015 which, as has been noted here before, inaccurately represents the victim’s name and age, calling him “Mr Mulu” aged 19.

So much for editorial standards of accuracy.

“You have an implied contract with your audiences. You’re asking them to trust you to check that what you’re saying is true and that your overall account isn’t misleading.”

UNQUOTE
BBC Watch is run by Jews for Jews. A sudden enthusiasm for accuracy sits ill with millennia of thieving and lies.