Media Power and Media Control

Who controls the past controls the future: who controls the present controls the past.
George Orwell 1903-50: Nineteen Eighty-Four (1949) Source -  Ask Oxford

The major influence on our knowledge and views is the media. Newspapers, books, magazines, television, wireless and now increasingly the Internet. Who controls them is a major issue; one which the media itself chooses to largely ignore Perhaps we should pay more attention to who is shaping our children's' minds as well as our own.

If they are honest men telling it like it is then we need not worry too much. If they are rogues with different agendas they will uncover different aspects of what is going on. But if they are rogues with similar agendas we need to worry. There are hundreds of owners, editors and apparatchiks shaping the agenda. It might be as many as thousand  but not much more. A lot of power is concentrated in the hands of a small group. It matters.

The owner of a newspaper has some control over it. He is subject to various forces but he is usually able to dictate the general tone of the editorial. Editors can be sacked and have been sacked. Print unions can also have major effects although it is not normally the content that concerns them. Newspapers can be shut down and the staff dismissed. It has been done by Rupert Murdoch to The Times. The printers were not pleased and when the electricians took over where they had left off they were furious.

Who are the owners? Someone has decided to tell. Someone did the checking. Someone tells us that the Jews have a stranglehold on the media in England. Someone decided to publish from Arabia where Jewish control is weaker.

Jewish media-power in England
QUOTE
Even though the Jews are only 0.5% of the population in Britain, they have an almost total grip on the media here, systematically, constantly and intensely feeding their propaganda and example to almost everyone in Britain, which is nothing new. With this media, they are uniformly, deliberately, systematically, constantly and intensely promoting both the transformation and permanent destruction of Britain into a Jew run state of Shabbez goyim and also the interests of the so-called “state of Israel”, against the wishes and interests of the British people. BBC television under the Jew Alan Yentob broadcasts into almost every home in Britain all day, every day. Likewise ITV.....  Carlton and Granada jointly own the London News Network. Channel 4......... BSkyB controlled by the Jew [ maybe - Editor ] and obsessively  [ de facto - Editor ] Zionist Rupert Murdoch broadcasts to over 10 million subscribers and their families every day. .......... BBC radio stations controlled by the Jewess Jenny Abramsky, alone accounting for 49% of all radio listening in Britain, every day....... We shall first consider their control of television and of radio, and then of the press; finally we shall give a summary of our findings. All data contained in the study are accurate as of June 2002.
UNQUOTE
Radio Islam isn't beating about the bush and what they have to say is entirely plausible although the accusation that Murdoch is a Jew are unconfirmed. His output means that he might just as well be.

kkkkkkk

 

Jew-controlled Press
Here are some quotes from a magazine for Jews called "Moment". It is subtitled "The Jewish magazine for the 90's" These quotes are from the Aug 1996 edition after the Headline "Jews Run Hollywood - So What?": "It makes no sense at all to try to deny the reality of Jewish power and prominence in popular culture. Any list of the most influential production executives at each of the major movie studios will produce a heavy majority of recognizably Jewish names."

"Furthermore, even those newspapers still under Gentile ownership and management are so thoroughly dependent upon Jewish advertising..."

"The New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, and the Washington Post. These three...are the newspapers which set trends and guidelines for nearly all others. They are the ones which decide what is news and what isn't, at national and international levels. They originate the news; the others merely copy it. And all three newspapers are in Jewish hands...The Sulzberger family also owns, through the New York Times Co. 36 other newspapers; twelve magazines, including McCall's and Family Circle..."

"New York's other newspapers are in no better hands than the Daily News. The New York Post is owned by billionaire Jewish real-estate developer Peter Kalikow. The Village Voice is the personal property of Leonard Stern. Source:- http://jewwatch.com/jew-controlledpress-folder.html

 

Alexa Ratings
What, if anything do they mean? The give some indication of the amount of traffic or the amount of manipulation.

 
Alexa Rating and Fraud
Newspaper owners take a serious interest in circulation figures. So do their advertisers. Alexa provides similar information for Internet traffic as far as it can be measured. How much do their numbers mean? Even less than they should.

 

Alternative Media Being Infiltrated
Is this possible? Yes. Is it happening. Yes., by Zionists. Wing TV points a finger at Alex Jones.

 

America's Next President, Ron Paul?
Follow the link to see the results or go to MSN polling to vote. Ron Paul is way out in front on line but the main stream media are doing a big job of suppressing him. He is not a system candidate; he is honest. They don't care which of the rest you go for; they all committed to Israel.

 

The Independent Television Commission
Is in the business of distorting the news, its statutory obligation notwithstanding.

 

Internet Control
The Internet is free, isn't it? Yes, more or less but there are powerful politicians and businessmen with agendas and controlling it is a big objective. The freedom it gave was granted by accident. The ability to tell the truth was definitely not what governments want. The Wikipedia is one part that has been created to follow the agenda of one Jew. It is like those newspapers - controlled by men with the same passports. See Control of internet information

 

How To Frame A Patriot
Barry Krusch writes about HOW it is done. He is interested in the mechanics of media manipulation rather than being a sympathiser. It is in .pdf format unfortunately but well worth a read.

 

Jews Control The British Media
Green, Desmond, Maxwell - those are just some of them.

 

Main Stream Media's Master Manipulators Are Jews
QUOTE
The Mind-Benders is an analysis of the media power in Great Britain. Written in 1997, it details how (and why) the information we receive via the media is censored and distorted. If we are to avoid insidious totalitarianism we must be aware of the enormous control over every form of mass media the Jews possess and in any democratic society under such powerful influences who are the real manipulators of political power...........

Who are the manipulators?

But who is behind it all? Who are the people who determine what is watched on television and printed in the newspapers? This is not so easy a study because a great many of the people concerned operate in the shadows. And even in the case of those whose names are known, what is known about their backgrounds and their connections? Very little.

For this reason, very few people in Britain are aware of the huge influence over the mass media exercised by a certain ethnic minority, namely the Jews.

Students of Jewish influence in the mass media will notice a paradox: while that influence is used, in a hundred or more different ways, to weaken the national spirit and racial pride of the British people, Jews themselves, in their attitude to their Israeli homeland and to questions of Zionism generally, are to be found amongst the world's most militant nationalists. In other words, what is good for us is definitely not good for them!
UNQUOTE
Jews have their fingers in many pies all the way up to the armpits. This is another analysis of a very ugly truth.

 

Marketing Homosexuality
Yes, it is being marketed by the media and the education industry. It is one front in a war of subversion; destroying our moral standards and our culture. Antonio Gramsci, the chief theoretician of the communist party would have loved it.

 

Rupert Murdoch
Rupe is enormous in media, having power and abusing power is the name of the game.

 

Who Rules America?
QUOTE
The Alien Grip on Our News and Entertainment Media Must Be Broken
UNQUOTE
This sounds rather paranoid. Can it possibly be true? Follow the evidence and the answer is; Yes, it can be true. Yes, it is true.

 

Wikipedia
Sells itself as the online encyclopaedia that anyone can edit. The truth is rather different. The owner has an agenda. He controls the content.

 

Wikipedia and Vandalism
Yes, they do get vandals changing pages. Yes they have to do something about it. No they do not have to be politically biased but they are.

 

Pondering The Telescreen
You thought that television was bad? It is worse. Fred explains in his usual cheerful style. He is a better writer than me so he makes the point better albeit he does not tell us who controls the rubbish or why.

QUOTE
What does Hollyork promote? Toleration of foul language and a concomitant coarsening of society; hostility between men and women; truculent illiteracy and the values of the black ghetto; the elevation of homosexuality and promiscuity; disdain for religion; use of drugs, interracial sex, destructive feminism, eradication of the remnants of Anglo-European Christian civilization. It is not accidental.
UNQUOTE

Between the wars Claud Cockburn realized that the newspapers of the day were feeding the public a very bland version of reality, the reality that was the common currency of diplomats, journos and even politicians. His insight led him to publish The Week which was fun, subversive and, in practice, impossible to sue. A libel action can take your money but if you have none, you are much safer. The Week has gone but now we have a new irritant for those who dislike the truth.

This  new wild card  is the Internet. Designed by DARPA for military communications, it has given ordinary people the ability to communicate worldwide. It is fair to say that a lot of their communication is third rate or worse but some is better. Telling the gold from the dross is not too difficult. The real payoff is that it bypasses the media moguls and governments. That is why we must be deeply suspicious of anyone who is selling us the solution to problems on the Net. Pornography is not pleasant. We hear the stories. Some of them might even be true. Yes; Spam is a problem. Certainly we could all do without it but offers to control the Net and prevent it are offers to control our lives; offers to give governments the power that they all seem to like far too much. If the choice on offer is Spam or government, I will settle for Spam.

 

Media Cover-up
QUOTE
Leading Journalists Expose Major Cover-ups by Media Corporations
UNQUOTE

Systematic lying tells me that there is an agenda [ or more ]. Journos write about the cover ups that were forced onto them. They found out about the power in the press as distinct from the power of the press. Systematic, deliberate, wide ranging lies are propagated by the press. People have decided to talk. See what the insiders have to say at:- http://www.wanttoknow.info/mediacover-up

 

Who Runs the Media? The Full Story
Someone else has taken the point that the media are controlled by Jews, which in practice means Zionists. He gives us sources. They are checkable.

 

BBC
The Beeb is known, respected, trusted etc. but not everyone thinks they are perfect. Some of us think they abused the their position very cleverly. They have been at the forefront when it comes to inciting homosexuality. They have a motive for that. Their Alexa rating is 10 which implies that nine sites get more traffic. See BBC Online

 

Bias: A CBS Insider Exposes How the Media Distort the News
by Bernard Goldberg. He was an insider then it all went wrong. More at Media Distortion

 

Bookleggers and Smuthounds: The Trade in Erotica, 1920-1940
Towering Men and Stout-Hearted Sisters. Jerusalem Post, March 9, 2000 - is a broken link sadly but see http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-pornography-archive.html which is live.
[ Book review of Jewish scholar Jay Gertzman's Bookleggers an Smuthounds ]
"A great many of the publishers and peddlers of what was variously called flagitious, pornographic, or erotic literature were Jews, and most of those were German Jews who had learned the printing trades in the old country. This fact of course fed right into the animosity of anti-smut crusaders who constantly decried the 'foreign, radical, corrupting' character of the smut peddlers. The main protagonists in this battle for the soul, if not the groin, of America were the patrician John Saxton Sumner of the New York Society for the Suppression of Vice, and Samuel Roth, a writer, poet and genuine man of letters and an equally authentic purveyor of sleaze.......

 

Mass-Mediated Terrorism- The Central Role of the Media in Terrorism and Counterterrorism
The name tells you the view point. There is one review on Amazon which says that it skates over state terrorism and is rather third rate. Get it from the library then read for yourself. Think for yourself and decide for yourself.

 

Racism and the Media
The media are very big on racism and blaming Englishmen. The reality is not quite the same.

 

ABC's culture of contempt
The Australian Broadcasting Commission is an arm's length management organisation [ ALMO ] with its own left wing agenda and an enthusiasm for denying. Notice the names of the guilty,  or should I say, the accused? The agenda is exactly the same as that of the BBC, inciting communism and homosexuality plus other trendy nastiness.

 

Horrific Media Spikes
This offering from Ted Lang popped up somewhere else entitled Jews Spike the News. That is a fair title. He tells us about the Jew who left the Department of Defence with the benefit of a news black out after a US$1 trillion went missing. Yes, a trillion, which is to say a thousand billion. Even in a world inured to politicians wasting billions rather than mere millions, a trillion is a LOT of money to defraud or steal or lose or find or give to your little mates or what ever.

 

AIPAC: Still Spying, Still Tax-Exempt
How many espionage operations get tax exemption? Not too many is the answer especially if they happen to be known as spies. But if they also have political influence and media control it becomes that much easier. That is how AIPAC does it.


Haaretz
Is the publicly respectable face of Israel. It is widely read and on the Internet. It tells us things that Jewish politicians would prefer us not to know but there are significant differences between the English version and the Hebrew version which is for home consumption only.

 

BURYING THE LANCET - PART 1
The Lancet told us that that 100,000 had been killed in Iraq. The media and politicians claimed that they were incompetent and wrong or just plain wrong. The media  are liars with an agenda. So are the politicians of course. Here is a longish factual analysis.

 

BURYING THE LANCET - PART 2
Count deaths in the Congo and count deaths in Iraq. Get accepted without question for the Congo while getting  called incompetents over Iraq. This is from men who are deeply ignorant of maths except for the purposes of expense claims and tax fraud.

 

BURYING THE LANCET - Update
Various people with various degrees of expertise respond. We are invited to tell various journos and reptiles that they are ignorant patter merchants.

 

'We Don't Own the News Any More' [ 6 October 2005 ]
'We' don't control it totally either and even if 'we' did 'we' are not trusted any more. We [ real people as distinct from 'we' the media ]  have got our own news channels now. We can broadcast over the Internet. 'We' don't like it. 'We' have not got total control any more. Notice that the BBC acts as an arm of the police state, carrying out espionage operations against political dissidents [ of the right  but never the  left  ] and having them prosecuted - maliciously of course.

Any one who tells us that the Internet should be controlled should be regarded with grave suspicion. They will have the standard excuses; child pornography, identity theft and so on. The media is still immensely powerful. It is not as crude as the propaganda machine in the USSR. Subtlety makes it far  more effective.

 

BBC 'wanted to sack Humphrys' [ 6 October 2005 ]
Green and Thompson wanted to sack John Humphrys after he told the truth and was betrayed by a Labour spy. Sacking would have proved that they were toeing the government line. They bottled out when it when public.

 

Pysops = Psychological Operations
QUOTE
"To this end," Vallely and co-author continued, "MindWar must be strategic in emphasis,............In its strategic context, MindWar must reach out to friends, enemies, and neutrals alike across the globe—neither through primitive 'battlefield' leaflets and loudspeakers of PSYOP nor through the weak, imprecise, and narrow effort of psychotronics—but through the media possessed by the United States which have the capabilities to reach virtually all people on the face of the Earth. These media are, of course the electronic media—television and radio. State of the art developments in satellite communication, video recording techniques, and laser and optical transmission of broadcasts make possible a penetration of the minds of the world such as would have been inconceivable just a few years ago. Like the sword Excalibur [King Arthur's magical sword—ed.], we have but to reach out and seize this tool; and it can transform the world for us if we have the courage and the integrity to enhance civilization with it. If we do not accept Excalibur, then we relinquish our ability to inspire foreign cultures with our morality. If they can then desire moralities unsatisfactory to us, we have no choice but to fight them on a more brutish level."
UNQUOTE

The media are a weapon of war although I doubt that these twerps have what it takes to use it. They already are being used in the culture war being waged by Hollywood, the BBC and the rest of the alphabet soup that feed our children's minds.

 

Pulitzer-Winning Lies
Walter Durante reported from Russia under Stalin, claimed that there was no famine in the Ukraine and lied in his teeth. The New York Times suspected that he was lying and ran the stories anyway.

 

Media Contacts
If you feel disposed to tell the media what you think about the drivel that they produce you can contact some of them through this link.

 

Errors & omissions, broken links, cock ups, over-emphasis, malice [ real or imaginary ] or whatever; if you find any I am open to comment.

Email me at Mike Emery. All financial contributions are cheerfully accepted. If you want to keep it private, use my PGP KeyHome Page

Updated onWednesday, 18 July 2012 18:38:35