Pussy Riot

The truth about Pussy Riot emerges. Yes, it is, as I suspected a Main Steam Media attack on Russia and on Vladimir Putin in particular. Surprised? NO! It is just another example of the Main Stream Media being used as a Propaganda machine against our interests. PR are obviously Feminists using obscenity, blasphemy and the Internet to provoke reactions so that they can claim that they are martyrs to some cause or other. The Wikipedia's article on them is another of their tendentious ones with frequent use of words like allege and claim. The Wiki admits begrudgingly that most Russians think they are connected to Voina [ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voina ], a bunch of left wing thieves who are keen on obscene exhibitionism. The name itself is an attack on decency; pussy is American slang for the vagina.

Who Pulls The Strings Of Femen And Pussy Riot? Questions have been asked, research has been done. The answer? Try Jews who hate us. You will not be wrong.

Martin Webster, lately of the National Front sent out this article from Israel Shamir with some context. Mr. Shamir, a Jew is also the subject of a hostile Wiki write up. There is another, more virulent smear job at http://www.tabletmag.com/jewish-news-and-politics/67305/his-jewish-problem

From: "Martin Webster" <martinwebstir@virginmedia.com>
To: "Martin Webster" <martinwebstir@virginmedia.com>
Subject: Western media's "Pussy Riot" humbug exposed
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 20:38:04 +0100
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/

Media humbug on ŒPussy Riotı
An insight into the campaign against Russia for
refusing to join the American-Jewish hegemony
by Martin Webster

Below is a posting from Israel Shamir, Editor of the ŒShamireadersı Yahoo Group. I do not agree with everything Shamir writes, but his output is always well worth reading.

Shamir is an Israeli Russian-Jew anti-Zionist campaigner who converted to Russian Orthodox Christianity a few years ago. The posting gives some excellent insights into the ŒWesternı (i.e. USA / Zionist-Jewish) assault on Russia in general and Vladimir Putin in particular.

While no human being is perfect, Putin is the greatest and perhaps the only major bastion against the effort being made by the American-Jewish ³Behemoth² to impose a tyranny over the entire world.

Shamirıs article gives some very revealing insights. For example, did you know that the remnant of Communist Party of GB, grouped around the Morning Star daily newspaper, are sympathetic to the current American-Jewish assault on Russia and refuse to criticise the Neo-Cons who have pushed America into a sequence of wars in the Middle East designed to make the region safe for Israel?

Putinıs interventions at the Security Council of the United Nations have not only allowed the secular Syrian government of Bashar al-Assad to mount an effective fight in a civil war instigated by American, French and other ŒWesternı intelligence agencies and their proxies (including Al-Qaeda!) but have also frustrated efforts to mount a formal foreign intervention Œauthorisedı by the UN, as was done in the case of Iraq.

If Syria falls to the motley of mainly non-Syrian Western-backed terrorists (including Bangla Deshis from London's Tower Hamlets!) and becomes absorbed into the American-Jewish hegemony just as Libya has been, then a war on Syriaıs neighbour, Iran, is but a border-crossing away.

It is Putinıs interventions at the UN which have given some degree of protection to Iran in the face of a wholly hypocritical Israeli American campaign to stop Iran developing nuclear technology.

That campaign is being pursued in support of Israelıs determination to be the only country in the Middle East not only to possess nuclear technology but an arsenal of nuclear-tipped missiles far bigger than that now possessed by Britain. Yet Israel still formally denies (when it can stifle its giggles) that it does not possess any nuclear weapons.

America now pays more to maintain Israelıs nuclear-equipped armed forces than Israel. (See:

It is when one appreciates this scenario that one realises why the American government, its sundry vassal states in Europe and the largely Jewish-controlled mass media are putting so much effort into backing each, every and any anti-Putin element in Russia.

The assault was led in the first instance by various Western ŒNon-Government Organisationsı. NGOs are supposedly non-political bodies dedicated to furthering cultural and welfare objectives and promoting goodwill. But the propaganda poison Western NGOs disseminated and the agitation they encouraged and subsidised constituted such an outrageous political campaign that no self-respecting sovereign state would tolerate such subversion.

Putinıs Russia is self-respecting and jealous of its sovereignty and so the alien NGO cuckoos have been driven out, bag and baggage.

Closely associated with the efforts of the NGOs were the Russian-Jewish ŒOligarchsı who had made their billions by robbing the Russia of its assets when the country was prostrate following the end of Communist rule, and who, when the Russian Bear stood up and began to growl, fled abroad (many to Israel) with their ill-gotten gains, which they used to fund ³dissident² groups in Russia.

Among these ³dissidents² may be found scum-of-the-earth hippy trash such as the all-female punk rock group Pussy Riot, who render their name in English, not in Russian.

The ŒWesternı media, not least the BBC, have been in over-drive trying to portray these vile women as ³martyrs² and ³heroines² and who now find themselves in jail for an ³anti-Putin demonstration². There was a typical example of this propaganda broadcast at 8.00pm last Monday, 1st October, by BBC Radio 4 in its Analysis series: ³Putin, the Patriarch and Pussy Riot².

This programme may be may be archived for a week on the BBC web site. Go see. The presenter was Lucy Ash  [Ash? Short for ³Ashkenazi²? - probably not - Jews hate her - Editor ] The producer was Nick Sturdee. {Sturdee? That is the first time I have encountered that formulation as an British surname.]

What the Analysis programme and the rest of the Westıs mainly Jewish-controlled media seeks to obscure is the fact that a gang of female hippy-trash took time off from participating in filmed group-sex antics to gate-crash a service at Moscowıs Cathedral of Christ the Saviour where they invaded the altar area and danced around chanting obscenities and abuse against Putin and the Russian Orthodox Church. The enraged congregation summoned the police, who arrested the shrieking harpies.

Analysis sought to blame Putin himself for the offensive (blasphemous to Christians) ³demonstration². The Russian Orthodox Church was also awarded blame for being on good terms with the Russian government. The Patriarch of the Orthodox Church was smeared as being ³corrupt². He wore an expensive wrist watch. What if we applied that kind of test to senior clerics of the Church of England ‹ or indeed leading rabbis of the UKıs United Synagogue or Beth Din?

Can we imagine what would have been the reaction of the media and the Establishment body politic if a group of anti-Jewish punks (if there be such hobgoblins) had burst into a synagogue during a High-Holy Day service and danced around the cabinet containing the Scrolls of the Law singing songs laced with obscenities and denunciations of Israelıs genocide against he Palestinian people?

They would have been arrested and changed with offenses contrary to the ŒPublic Order Act as Amended by the Race Relations Actı, e.g.: ³Racially and/or Religiously Aggravated Incitement to Hatred² or some such legal concoction. On conviction the perpetrators would find themselves with jail sentences of up to five years.

That is exactly what has happened to the Pussy Riot rabble. But to believe
the Western media, you would think they had been on a peaceful if noisy
demonstration when they were set-upon by state spooks and given lengthy jail
terms simply for ³criticising Putin².

The only difference between my hypothetical case and the actual event in Russia is that the Pussy Riot victims were Christians and, to the ŒWesternı politically correct mind-set, white-gentile-Christians should not expect as much (or indeed any) protection from anti-ŒHateı laws as minority ethnic groups, especially the Jews! After all, it was the Board of Deputies of British Jews who devised and promoted the first version of the Race Relations Act under the title of the ŒGroup Libel Billı during the early 1950s. Are they not entitled to special privileges?

This example of the mediaıs power to mislead, disinform and inflict character assassinations brings to mind an anecdote related to me by the late A.K. Chesterton MC, who co-founded the National Front in 1967. In the early 1950s he was Literary Advisor to Lord Beaverbrook (Max Aitken), owner of the Beaverbrook Press, then the mightiest press empire in Britain, whose flagship was the Daily Express.

Chesterton was occasionally invited to Beaverbrookıs country mansion for weekend house parties. At these Chesterton lost no opportunity to lobby Beaverbrook about the machinations of ³Jewish International Finance². Beaverbrook was very well up on that subject and agreed with Chesterton that ³the Money Power² was pursuing anti-British policies and was intent on dragooning all peoples and nations into a World Government.

After several such meetings Chesterton put it to Beaverbook: ³It seems we agree on all the essentials. As you run the greatest newspaper organisation in the country, why do you not use your asset to expose the world what Jewry is doing ­ and seeking to do?²

Beaverbrook looked back at Chesterton aghast, gripped his arm and said: ³You just donıt know what you are asking! These people can tear the flesh from your bones ..... the flesh from your bones!²

We must be grateful that there is somebody in the world of High Politics who, as calmly and as skilfully as he can, is standing up to ³These People². That man is Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin.

We should also be grateful for people like Israel Adam Shamir, who has been able to for shrug off ³the weight of three thousand years².

Martin Webster.


From: Israel Shamir <adam@israelshamir.net>
Reply-To: <shamireaders-owner@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Saturday, 29 September 2012 10:33
To: readers <shamireaders@yahoogroups.com>
Cc: <zorin@left.ru>, Cliff Cocker <arts@peoples-press.com>
Subject: [shamireaders] Pussies Riot against Putin, from London to Moscow

Pussies Riot against Putin from London to Moscow
by Israel Shamir

I received a letter from the Arts Editor of the Morning Star asking for my
permission to re-publish my popular essay on the Pussy Riot:

> ³Dear Mr. Shamir,
> ³Iım the arts editor of the Morning Star newspaper (see
> <http://www.morningstaronline.co.uk/> ) and wı'd like to reprint an edited
> version of your Pussy Riot article.
> ³Would you please grant permission? Unfortunately, we run on a shoestring so
> weıre unable to pay a fee but I hope you will agree as it will bring your
> challenging piece to a wider readership.
> ³Iıd be grateful for a swift response as we have a possible slot free in next
> Saturday's publication.
> With very best wishes
> ³Clifford Cocker, Arts editor, Morning Star newspaper²

I gave my permission immediately, and they published it ­ and took it down
in a few hours under pressure of the Jewish Lobby.

The Lobby had a good reason to object. In this article, I wrote:

> ³For much milder anti-Jewish hate talk, European countries customarily
> sentence offenders to two-to-five years of prison for the first offence. The
> Russians applied hate crime laws to offenders against Christian faith, and
> this is probably a Russian novelty. The Russians proved that they care for
> Christ as much as the French care for Auschwitz, and this shocked the
> Europeans who apparently thought Œhate lawsı may be applied only to protect
> Jews and gays. The Western governments call for more freedom for the
> anti-Christian Russians, while denying it for holocaust revisionists in their
> midst.²

Actually, the Jewish angle to the PR affair is more than that: though I did
not find it necessary to mention in my article, the most outspoken PR
supporters and enemies of the Church in Russia, such as Viktor Shenderovich,
Igor Eidman, Marat Gelman, happen to be of Jewish origin. None of them is a
practicing Jew, but they apparently inherited their hatred to the Church
from their forefathers. All of them support Western imperialism, as well.

Surely, there are many non-Jews who hate the Church, and there are many
descendants of Jews who came to Christ, but still the correlation canıt be
denied. The British Jewish Œtribal or kosherı Marxists provide their
support, for, in words of Gilad Atzmon
<http://www.gilad.co.uk/writings/gilad-atzmon-tribal-marxism-for-dummies.htm> :

> ³Jewish Marxism is very different from Marxism or socialism in general. While
> Marxism is a universal paradigm, Jewish Marxism is basically a crude
> utilisation of ŒMarxist-likeı terminology for the Jewish tribal cause.²

Atzmon could add they also support the Empire. Indeed they were on the
watch; they applied pressure
< http://hurryupharry.org/2012/09/23/antisemite-shamirs-attack-on-pussy-riot-briefly-appears-in-the-morning-star/> to the Morning Star, and the British
Communists surrendered immediately.

They did not care that the attacks proceeded from Harryıs Place
<http://hurryupharry.org> , the dirtiest Zionist leftist blog in Britain,
wholeheartedly pro-imperialist, viciously anti-Muslim, positioned against
Iran and Syria, violently anti-Russian, and surely anti-Shamir. Harryıs
Place described me as:

> ³.....antisemite / Holocaust denier / Assange collaborator / Lukashenko
> enabler / all-around slimeball Israel Shamir².

I think of using it as my signature in future..

They apologised to the readers in the following language:

> ³A NUMBER of you have raised concerns over the decision to reprint an article
> by Israel Shamir on the Russian band Pussy Riot that appeared in the weekendıs
> Morning Star.
> ³The paper would like to reassure readers that the piece was syndicated from
> Counterpunch in good faith without knowledge of the authorıs background.
> ³We would like to reiterate the paperıs commitment to publishing writers who
> reflect and remain steadfastly committed to the values of anti-racism,
> anti-fascism, international solidarity and social justice that the paper has
> campaigned for ever since its establishment.
> ³It remains guided by those goals and will seek in future, wherever possible,
> to establish the full biography of writers before publishing their work.
> ³In the meantime the Morning Star would like to distance itself from the
> opinions of the author of the piece, which do not reflect our position or
> those of the wider movement.
> ³We apologise wholeheartedly for any distress caused.²

So many code-words to mask their weak knees. If they canıt stand up to a few
Jewish Marxists, how can they stand up to real big capitalist enemies?

But I do not want to end on such a determinist note, condemning the Reds and
condemning the Jews. Despite all correlations, people are free to think and
to act. We have free will. Some of the strongest voices against the PR
outrage were Reds and Jews, or rather Russian leftists of
<http://www.left.ru> , some of Jewish origin and some not, all strongly
anti-Zionist (they even translated and published Israel Shahak). Here are
excepts from one of their texts, by Valentin Zorin. It explains well the
position of the Russian anti-imperialist Left which should eventually
influence the Western anti-imperialist Left and Right.

> Pussies Rioting against Independent Russia
> by Valentin Zorin
> [excepts]
> (in Russian <http://left.ru/2012/4/zorin215.phtml> )
> ³ŠNot only their name (Pussy Riot) is in English. They talk as if they
> translate from English. They use language of an Americanised native who thinks
> and speaks the colonisersı language. Russia is definitely not a colony of the
> Anglo-American Empire, at least it is not a colony yet, but already we have
> colonised natives in droves, for colonisation is not a single event but a
> lasting processŠ
> ³The PR belong to bourgeois radical left paradigm adapted for the colonised
> nations. Their roots are to be found in the early period of the Cold War, when
> the US decided to use leftist ideology to fight communism. Feminism, beatniks,
> sexual liberation, even civil rights movement were sponsored by American state
> agencies and by private interests. They developed gender studies, imported
> French post-structuralism of Foucault and Derrida, and eventually exported
> into colonised cultures.
> ³For what reason? Just guess, which soldier would fight better for Russia, one
> who believes in ŒGod, King and Motherlandı or one who thinks that all these
> ideas (always excepting post-modernism and post-structuralism) are just
> deliberate illusions created by the authorities? Or make it easier: what would
> rather wear Russian marines under their battledress in face-to-face combat, a
> cross or a politically correct and gender-adjusted image?
> ³I know, after asking this question, Iıll be forever banned from entering the
> Kingdom of the Leftist Heaven. A French maître of post-something would
> sarcastically smirk, and ultra-conservatives would applaud, to my chagrin. But
> this question allows to divine the meaning of the PR affair, for the meaning
> is not in our hands, nor it is in hands of Putin, neither of the Church. The
> Imperial Masters of Discourse rule what is the meaning, while we can only
> understand it ­ or not. All Western newspapers made it clear: ŒPutin versus
> PR; Putin persecutes the PR, PR against Putinı. It was repeated by the
> colonial media in Russia, by practically everybody of importance excepting
> such dyed-in-the-wool fogies as yours truly.
> ³Who made the PR so successful and famous, who secured their place in history?
> Putin did. Putin is our alpha and omega. Please do not beat me! It is not my
> doing, it is them, the Pussies! They did not ask the Virgin to banish private
> property, dope traders, human traffickers, oligarchs, bankers, police, Sixth
> fleet, me or anything else. They asked her to remove a small unseemly guy
> named Putin from the Kremlin. Even if the Pussies were mistaken, the State
> Department, Madonna, Mme Clinton and Mme Merkel, the NY Times and the Guardian
> could not be wrong. They all know that behind Putin there is a force that sets
> limit to Imperial omnipotence and to the Mastersı monopoly on the meaning of
> things.
> ³Without Putin, i.e. without independent Russia blocking the road of the
> Western Empire to full spectrum dominance, nobody would notice the Pussies, or
> us, or even our biggest oligarchs. It is unpleasant to hear, but we would
> become a remote and irrelevant province of the Empire, fit for business or
> pleasure but of no political importance. We would become eating and
> TV-watching nothingness. A small garrison of imperial troopers would suffice
> to control us. But despite all Imperial efforts, Putin still sits in the
> Kremlin.
> ³What is the secret of his political longevity? Cruel repressions? But if so,
> where are the martyrs? The only possibly political prisoner is the oligarch
> Khodorkovsky. The second best, Udaltsov, never rated for more than 15 days of
> detention. So perhaps the secret is ­ the silent support of the masses that do
> not agree to sink in Nothingness?
> ³There are many reasons to be disgusted by the Church, as she consecrates
> capitalist violence. But if masses need it as ³the heart of heartless world²
> in order to survive, let it be. It is good. And if masses silently support
> Putin, because there is no other force able to withstand the assault of the
> Empire and of Nothingness, let it be. It is good.²

And here a letter of an English reader reacting on the Morning Star

From Elisha Traven:

> ³I don't agree with everything you write as I'm not always sure where you are
> coming from. But writers like you need to be read over a period of time and
> not continually picked up and criticised. If you don't like what the cook has
> prepared then don't shout at him. There is no point. Just leave the restaurant
> and find a place where the food and wine and beer and clientele suit you. Let
> each writer be himself is my motto. There are some who could do with being
> shot but where would this all end?
> ³I was amazed to read in today's Morning Star that an article by you which
> they had published on Saturday was not to their reader's liking. They
> apologised to their readers and distanced themselves from the views you
> expressed. Apparently they had lifted the article from Counterpunch and had no
> idea who you were. Who do they think they're kidding? They are either truly
> ignorant in regard to you which beggars belief. It is just not a creditable
> defence. This newspaper is heavily involved in the campaign for Palestinian
> rights. They would know the names of every single child in the Gaza Strip and
> the West Bank such is their knowledge of the situation out there.
> ³You know what I mean. I have read extremely detailed news articles published
> by the Palestinian Solidarity Campaign in their magazine. If I am reading such
> a magazine then so are they. We get continued reports from Palestine delivered
> to packed meetings here which are held all over the country. Organised by
> every tom, dick, and harry socialist party. They know you alright. They
> couldn't fail to know you because of your strong support for the Palestinians.
> I'm not sure what is going on at the Morning Star. They don't normally listen
> to their readers. They preach the gospel according to Karl Marx and Vladimir
> Lenin. You take it as it comes. Delivered to the readers from on high.
> ³I didn't realise you were living in Moscow. I know what you are saying about
> the Russian press is true since I have read it over a period of time through
> various sources. Translated or already available in English. Like Moscow
> Times. They are running an orchestrated campaign against the Russian state. It
> is not like the so called liberal newspapers in Britain and America. They are
> connected up to the street protest gangs and were delighted when large numbers
> of people demonstrated last December and in March. Not only were the people
> being egged on to cause a breakdown of social order by well known Russian
> newspapers but radio stations such as Echo Moscow were part of that criminal
> conspiracy too. I call it a criminal conspiracy because that's what it looks
> like to me. I found the article you wrote about the PR hooligan girls. The
> Morning Star has removed Saturday's digital edition of the paper from its site
> altogether. Even though that breaks the subscription agreement which is that
> they allow you to read the Morning Star's previous digital editions of the
> paper. I think this is every edition for the past two weeks or it might even
> be for a month. I agree with you about PR.
> ³Elijah Traven, Hull, East Riding of Yorkshire.²
> ³PS George Galloway of the Respect Party is MP for Bradford West which is in
> south Yorkshire. He is well known for his strong support of the Palestinian
> people. I'm sure you know of him. I salute you, Israel Shamir, for your love
> of Russia and defence of their elected president. You are a true and loyal
> servant of social democracy and the rule of law.²

[How to application/octet-stream (185575 bytes)]