The Paris Peace Conference in 1919 was about bringing a formal end to the First World War. The Treaty of Versailles tidied up the loose ends and decided who got what. It also decided who lost what. The answer to that was Germany. This went down very badly with the Germans. They did lose their colonies which arguably were more nuisance than they were worth. They lost territory to France and Poland. The whole thing, especially the Stab-in-the-back 'legend' was a major force for the next war. John Maynard Keynes said much the same in his book, The Economic Consequences of the Peace. The High Cost Of Vengeance argues somewhat thus.
Versailles Treaty ex Wiki
Was the result of the meeting of the victors after the First World War that decided what was going to be done to Germany. The verdict was; Rob them blind. The French were particularly vindictive. Germany lost all of its colonies. Remember Sudwest Afrika which is now called Namibia? It also lost a lot of its own territory. Screwing them was not entirely a good idea. It helped start the next war.
In January 1923 French and Belgian troops invaded the Ruhr because the Germans had not paid an installment of the reparations demanded by the Treaty
Treaty of Versailles ex Wapedia
On 29 April the German delegation under the leadership of the Foreign Minister Ulrich Graf von Brockdorff-Rantzau arrived in Versailles. On 7 May when faced with the conditions dictated by the victors, including the so-called "War Guilt Clause", von Brockdorff-Rantzau replied to Clemenceau, Wilson and Lloyd George: "We know the full brunt of hate that confronts us here. You demand from us to confess we were the only guilty party of war; such a confession in my mouth would be a lie." Because Germany was not allowed to take part in the negotiations, the German government issued a protest against what it considered to be unfair demands, and a "violation of honour" and soon afterwards, withdrew from the proceedings of the Treaty of Versailles.
Germans of all political shades denounced the treaty—particularly the provision that blamed Germany for starting the war—as an insult to the nation's honour. They referred to the treaty as "the Diktat" since its terms were presented to Germany on a take-it-or-leave-it basis. Germany's first democratically elected Chancellor, Philipp Scheidemann, refused to sign the treaty and resigned. In a passionate speech before the National Assembly on 12 March 1919, he called the treaty a "murderous plan" and exclaimed,
Which hand, trying to put us in chains like these, would not wither? The treaty is unacceptable...............
The German economy was so weak that only a small percentage of reparations was paid in hard currency. citation needed] Nonetheless, even the payment of this small percentage of the original reparations (132 billion gold Reichsmarks) still placed a significant burden on the German economy. Although the causes of the devastating post-war hyperinflation are complex and disputed, Germans blamed the near-collapse of their economy on the Treaty, and some economists estimated that the reparations accounted for as much as one third of the hyper-inflation. citation needed]
In March 1921, French and Belgian troops occupied Duisburg, which formed part of the demilitarized Rhineland, according to the Treaty of Versailles. In January 1923 French and Belgian forces occupied [ invaded is the honest word - Editor ] the rest of the Ruhr area as a reprisal after Germany failed to fulfill reparation payments demanded by the Versailles Treaty. The German government answered with "passive resistance," which meant that coal miners and railway workers refused to obey any instructions by the occupation forces. Production and transportation came to a standstill, but the financial consequences contributed to German hyperinflation and completely ruined public finances in Germany. Consequently, passive resistance was called off in late 1923. The end of passive resistance in the Ruhr allowed Germany to undertake a currency reform and to negotiate the Dawes Plan, which led to the withdrawal of French and Belgian troops from the Ruhr Area in 1925.
This Treaty went down very badly in Germany and with reason. That is why they believed the Stab-in-the-back 'legend'.
The Stab-in-the-Back Legend was a popular, right-wing political legend of post-First World War Germany, which remained current until the eve of the Second World War. In attributing Imperial German loss of the war to the public’s failure in answering their “patriotic calling”, and to war effort-sabotage of the socialists, the Bolsheviks, and the Jews, and not to the Reichsheer’s inability to engage battle, it exonerated the military of their defeat. Culturally, the legendary dagger-stabbing of the German Army parallels the hero’s fate in the epic poem Nibelungenlied (Song of the Nibelungs), wherein Siegfried is stabbed in the back by Hagen von Tronje......
Historically, the Dolchstoßlegende proved important to the political ascension of Adolf Hitler; as the Nazi Party grew, it maintained an original, true-believer base, embittered Great War veterans who believed the patriotic legend and its mythic interpretation of Germany’s recent military history. The Dolchstoßlegende ideologically encapsulates the justifications of Nazi Germany’s persecution and murder of Jews, communists, socialists and intellectuals, bringing into line every dissident.
Calling it a legend is propaganda. Story would be a neutral word in this context. This article does not point out that Jew and communist are almost interchangeable terms. Given the facts of the Communist Party Of Germany's take over of Bavaria and their attempt to do the same in Berlin, people were well aware that communism was an active evil. Jews like Rosa Luxemburg and Paul Levi were very much at the forefront of subversion.
The “Dagger-stab-in-the-back Legend”: Austrian right-wing caricature of a Jew stabbing the German Army in the back with a dagger. The capitulation was blamed upon the unpatriotic populace, the Socialists, Bolsheviks, the Weimar Republic, and especially the Jews. (1919)
Georges Clemenceau ex Wiki
Was the head Frenchman at Versailles on the day.
Louis-Lucien Klotz ex Wiki
The French money man, a clot, a Jew and there.
Lords of Finance: The Bankers Who Broke the World
by Liaquat Ahamed covers the Versailles Conference, telling us that:
66 Jacques de Reinach, a Jew was murdered and that Cornelius Herz, a Jew and crook did a runner
Clemenceau said Lucien Klotz, the French money wallah was the only Jew who knew nothing about money - went down in July 1929 for bent cheques - died in nick.
Page 107 et seq
Tells us that the Germans were extremely upset by the oppressive nature of the Versailles terms and by the medieval arrogance of the victors.