The General Election Authoritarian Hag v Fenian Scumbag [ 29 May 2017 ]
It is fair to say that Sean Gabb, who is
England's leading Libertarian is not amused by
the front runners.
QUOTE
The General Election: Authoritarian Hag v Fenian Scumbag
For the avoidance of doubt, I still intend to vote Conservative in this
dreadful election. And, if Labour seems to be catching up in the opinion
polls, so, I suspect, will enough people to give the
Conservatives a decent
majority. The general election is a rerun of last year’s
Referendum. There
is no other consideration that ought to sway anyone who is looking beyond
our present circumstances. We vote Conservative. We leave the European
Union. We hope and work for a realignment in British politics..............
Theresa May and Jeremy Corbyn have made their responses to the Manchester Bombings. According to the BBC,
Theresa May has urged world leaders to do more to combat online extremism, saying the fight against so-called Islamic State is “moving from the battlefield to the internet.”
What she has in mind is outlined in the Conservative Manifesto:..............
The Conservatives are proposing to censor the Internet [ and Free Speech be damned ]. Anyone who, in this country, publishes opinions or alleged facts the authorities dislike will be prosecuted. If these are published abroad, access to the relevant websites will be blocked. Internet companies will be taxed to pay for a Ministry of Propaganda to go beyond anything now provided by the BBC................
In Britain, in Europe, in America, there are powerful interests that are itching to censor the Internet. It is the Internet that has made us cynical. It is the Internet that is giving us the probable truth. It is because of the Internet that the authorities are being held to account. Never let a good atrocity go to waste. Get the people ready for censorship while the bodies are still being reassembled.
Jeremy Corbyn, I grant, has been slightly better. He sees Islamic terrorism as a response to our endless wars of aggression in the Islamic World.........
Yes, I will pinch my nose again the Thursday
after next, and vote Conservative – in the hope, and perhaps in the belief,
that I shall have a better choice in 2022.
UNQUOTE
Yes, the
Internet is a truth machine. That is why the
Establishment hates it. Yes
Comrade Corbyn is malign. Yes, May and
Corbyn have every intention of importing thousands or millions more
Third World aliens. They are
Traitors all. Proof? See e.g. the next one.
Tories Will Lose Seats Says Polling Firm
[ 31 May 2017 ]
QUOTE
Controversial YouGov estimate points to hung parliament with 20
fewer seats for May.
The predicted result would be a
disaster for the Tory leader who called an election in the hope of
securing a landslide
The Conservative Party could be in line to lose 20 seats and Labour gain nearly 30 in next week’s general election, according to new modelling by one of the country’s leading pollsters.
YouGov’s first constituency-by- constituency estimate of the election result predicts that the Tories would fall short of an overall majority by 16 seats, leading to a hung parliament.
The central projection of the model, which allows for a wide
margin of error, would be a catastrophic outcome for Theresa May [ and
England ],
who called the election when polls pointed to a landslide result.
Her support appears to have plunged after the poor reception of the
party manifesto, including plans to make more elderly voters pay for
home care.
UNQUOTE
Some damn fool messing about with people's life savings do not help. A bad
result would please
Comrade Sturgeon, an evil rogue full of hate.
DUP Demands A Price For Helping May & Brexit
QUOTE
The Tories look set to water down their controversial 'dementia tax' as part
of a deal with the DUP. The small Northern Irish unionist party, which is in
talks with the Conservatives to keep Theresa May in power, has reportedly
made protecting pensioners central to their wish list of demands.
Many Tory voters switched to the DUP [ That is total rubbish - there were not Tories to vote for - Editor ] because they were angry at Mrs May's plans to make more pensioners have to use the value of their home to pay for their care.............
The party believes [ because it is true ] that former veterans are being hounded through the courts while others involved in Republican violence are not.........
Under hugely unpopular social care reforms unveiled in the Tory manifesto, tens of thousands of people who receive care at home face costly bills as – for the first time. The value of a person’s home will be included in their assets, with only the last £100,000 protected.
The policy bombed with voters and was seen as
the turning point which saw Mrs May's election campaign derail - ending in
her humiliation in the vote on Thursday night.
UNQUOTE
The DUP has its wish list. They will get some; enough perhaps to restart the
guerrilla war in Ireland. The DUP is right about
the dementia tax; an obviously stupid idea. Ditto for
Malicious Prosecution being used to
screw men of the British Army while
IRA murderers have immunity.
With the DUP on side Theresa May will have a
majority of 6, enough but only just.
Voting Guide For Thursday
[ 7 June 2017 ]
QUOTE
Remember the ‘progressive alliance’? At
the start of the election campaign, with Labour floundering in the
polls, many on the Left were calling for Labour voters to back
LibDem, Green,
SNP and Plaid Cymru candidates in some constituencies
in the hope of cutting
Theresa May’s majority as far as possible. Instead, the minor parties have withered
as
Labour has strengthened in the polls, to the point at which it is
just conceivable — if still unlikely — that we could be waking up to a
Jeremy Corbyn premiership on Friday morning. Now, it is they who should
consider voting tactically............. But where the picture is more confused,
there are three ways people can vote tactically to help Mrs May win the
strongest mandate to carry into the Brexit negotiations.
First, there are millions of people who
voted for UKIP in 2015 who may well be inclined to return their vote to
the Tories because they understand Mrs May is the best chance we have of
delivering a strong Brexit. This is especially relevant where Labour
won the seat two years ago, but where the combined total of the UKIP and
Conservative votes would have prevailed.
UNQUOTE
This is one of the
Daily Mail's better efforts. The data will have come from
Conservative Party HQ. The point is
how to vote against Labour, against
Comrade Corbyn, against a
disastrous Brexit.
With malice toward none, with charity for all, with firmness in the right as God gives us to see the right, let us strive on to finish the work we are in, to bind up the nation's wounds, to care for him who shall have borne the battle and for his widow and his orphan, to do all which may achieve and cherish a just and lasting peace among ourselves and with all nations..
--Abraham Lincoln, 2nd Inaugural AddressNow go, attack the Amalekites and totally destroy all that belongs to them. Do not spare them; put to death men and women, children and infants, cattle and sheep, camels and donkeys.'
--1 Samuel 15:3
The Jubilee of Mercy decreed by Pope Francis limps to a close in December, but it is not exactly wrapping up the way the current successor to St. Peter hoped. In the burned out heartland of old Christendom, the Pope’s neo- pagan flock is rejecting his suicidal brand of demographic ecumenism in favor of a more muscular European identity. In Latin America, Liberation Theology—a Judaized Catholic syncretism [ synthesis ] with Marxism—is yielding to food riots, gang violence, and the rising cult of Santa Muerte. And in America, home to more Roman Catholics than any other nation on Earth, voters overwhelming rejected Francis’ last minute plea to reject “physical and social walls” that “close in some and exclude others.” 52% of American Catholics defied their bishops and voted for Donald Trump (a number that includes Hispanic Catholics). In fact, the entire Vatican II edifice of puerile modernism, liturgical dumb fuckery, and devotional malaise is teetering towards collapse. Catholics, it seems, are less interested in social justice and building “man’s habitat on Earth” alongside Luciferian globalists than in seeing to the survival of their children and the salvation of their eternal souls. Mother Teresa of Calcutta may be our newest saint, but it is Fr. Hamel of Saint-Etienne-de-Rouvray who is attracting a personal cult. His last words to his Muslim killers, uttered before the Real Presence, were “Begone, Satan!”
In the pre-Christian world, mercy was generally seen for what it is: a political stratagem that helped consolidate power by enlarging the circle of those indebted to the victors. Julius Caesar was renowned for his mercy ]. Darius the Great buried the memory [ of ] the hated Assyrians by publicly practicing tolerance and forgiveness toward the vanquished.
It was only in Christian Europe that a veneer of doctrinal piety was added to what had always been considered a political expediency. And make no mistake, this served our people well for a long time. It fostered the formation of the enduring alliances and transnational allegiances that gave birth to a universal European, Christian identity. Mercy practiced toward redeemable ethnic cousins solidifies blood ties and tamps down counterproductive internecine strife.
But here’s the thing about mercy: it is a kind of implicit white privilege, the privilege of victors and conquerors. We know that in most of the world and throughout most of history, the victors have generally elected to satiate their desire for vengeance rather than indulge in the more spiritual pleasure of mercy. The practice of eating an enemy’s brains and testicles is still practiced by chieftain-Presidents in “modern” Africa. The Japanese rape of Nanking mirrored the Israelite treatment of the Amalekites. Certainly, the Jews showed no mercy to the conquered German national socialists at Nuremberg.
Aside from the obvious psycho-evolutionary basis for this kind of behavior, we ought to ask “why do they act in this way? Why is it that, seemingly alone among humanity, white Westerners fetishize mercy toward the defeated into what amounts to political masochism?”
Simply put, it is because other ethnic groups understand the eternal truth that mercy in the midst of battle is not mercy at all: it is betrayal. Is it mercy to allow the enemy who showed up at your gates threatening to slaughter you, rape your women, and enslave your children to enter the city? Of course not! Like every other virtue, mercy must be weighed in the balance against its costs. After the enemy is decimated, his temples thrown down, his people dispersed, then perhaps the benefits of mercy outweigh its potential risks. Perhaps. Lincoln’s vaunted rhetoric in his 2nd Inaugural Address would not have been possible were it not for the ruthlessness of General Sherman’s march to the sea. Where was Lincoln’s mercy then?
The problem with mercy in an egalitarian democracy is that it misconstrues the nature of the conflict. In such societies, politics is an eternal war. There are no final, decisive battles. An election—even an election as momentous as the one that elevated the God Emperor—does nothing more or less than create the opportunity to implement an agenda. The agenda can only be implemented through the force of will, and this necessitates the crushing of the enemy’s will since, like it or not, they are still alive.
Basic bitch conservatives have never understood this because they never really understanding anything important or eternal. They see the election itself as the battle, as if a victory at the polls has some kind of intrinsic value. To them, an electoral win simply provides an opportunity to retire to the fainting couch and recuperate while the Left is temporarily blocked from accelerating the slide into degeneracy. Part of their recuperation plan is a generous heaping of self-congratulatory, fetished mercy towards those who only days before were promising to exterminate them.
This has to end, and Christians and Catholics who want to preserve our people and our culture must re-discover their latent faculty of discernment. “There a time for all things under Heaven,” including vengeance and ruthless determination. In the coming days, weeks and months, we will all be tempted to pre-mature displays of mercy. Last night, my wife—a reasonably based Entwife who proudly voted for Donald Trump—was reading the Facebook posts of some of her GLBTQ friends. After a few minutes, she asked me: “Why are these people so afraid? Is Trump really going to hurt them? I don’t want them to suffer.”
My first reaction was to smile and dismiss this as harmless political naivete. My old cuckservative self would have done so. This time, however, I took the opportunity to remind her of what these poor, suffering GLBTQ’s were promising to do to us and our children had they won the election: destroy Christianity, force demonic gender ideology on our children, push the Overton window towards toleration of Paedophilia, force Catholic hospitals to perform abortions, ever-more degenerate media content, etc. How afraid were we? How much mercy and restraint would they have shown our family?
The battle rages on, fam. The only thing that has changed is that we now hold the high ground. We must steel ourselves to be more Sherman than Lincoln. There may be time for mercy in some distant future in which we have secured the existence of our people and our way of life. Until then, we must proceed apace, with malice towards many.