Jews are objecting to
calling the massacre of Armenians by Turks by that name. It is
#Armenian Genocide denial. Their
Holocaust® Story is different. Denying that one is
crime.
Ed Steele explains.
Ed is currently [ 2010 ] in prison accused of plotting murder. Cause and effect? A lot of
people would say so.
The
Jews are [ in 2010 ] making a lot of noise about this issue. Then it will all go
quiet. That is their way. Get the truth suppressed then let us forget
about it. They do like the truth if it is convenient. Otherwise forget
it.
That is why they control the media. But
Gwynne Dyer was in the archives, doing the research. He saw the original documentation in
Ankara. He sounds right. Got to
#Revisiting Armenian Genocide. Or look at what #Judicial
has to say; he is very far from reliable. Other sources are below at
#Armenian Genocide. Read for yourself. Think
for yourself Decide for yourself.
Revisiting Armenian Genocide
It is with great reluctance that I write about the Armenian genocide,
as I know from experience that what I say will infuriate both sides.
But it is the 100th anniversary of the catastrophe this month, and
Pope Francis has just declared that the mass killing of Armenian
citizens of the Ottoman empire in 1915 was indeed a genocide. Turkey,
predictably, has responded by withdrawing its ambassador from the
Vatican.
Well, surprise! We’ve been listening to this argument for several
generations now, and it rarely gets much further than “Yes, you did!”
“No, I didn’t!” Unfortunately, I know a lot more about it than that.
Ages ago, when I was a history graduate student doing research about
Turkey’s role in the First World War, I got into the Turkish General
Staff archives in Ankara and found the actual telegrams (written in the
old riqa script) that went back and forth between Istanbul and
eastern Anatolia in the spring of 1915.
Later on I saw the British and Russian documents on their plans for
joint action with Armenian revolutionaries in the spring of 1915, so I
also know the context in which the Turks and Armenians were acting. And
I can say with some confidence that both sides are wrong.
There was an Armenian genocide. Of course there was. When up to
800,000 people from a single ethnic and religious community die from
violence, hunger, or exposure in a short time, and they are under guard
by armed men from a different ethnicity and religion at the time, it’s
an open-and-shut case. (Today’s Armenians say 1.5 million died in 1915,
but that’s too high. It could be as few as half a million, but 800,000
is plausible.)
On the other hand, the Armenians desperately want their tragedy to be
seen in the same light as the Nazi attempt to exterminate the European
Jews, and won’t settle for anything less. But what happened to the
Armenians was not pre-planned by the Turkish government, and there was
provocation from the Armenian side. That doesn’t remotely begin to
justify what happened, but it does put the Turks in a somewhat different
light.
A group of junior officers called the Young Turks seized control of
the Ottoman empire in 1908, and their leader, Enver Pasha, foolishly
took the empire into the First World War at Germany’s side in November
1914. He then led a Turkish army east to attack Russia, which was allied
to Britain and France.
That army was destroyed in the deep snow around Kars—only 10 percent
of it got back to base—and the Turks panicked. The Russians didn’t
follow right away—poor generalship—but the Turks had almost nothing left
to stop them if they did. The Turks scrambled to put some kind of
defensive line together, but behind them in eastern Anatolia were
Christian Armenians who had been agitating for independence from the
empire for decades.
Various revolutionary Armenian groups had been in touch with Moscow,
offering to stage uprisings behind the Turkish army when Russian troops
arrived in Anatolia. Learning that the Turks had retreated in disarray,
some groups assumed the Russians were on their way and jumped the gun.
Similarly the Armenian revolutionary groups further south, near the
Mediterranean coast, were in contact with the British command in Egypt,
and had promised an uprising to coincide with planned British landings
on the Turkish south coast near Adana. Quite late in the day the British
switched their planned invasion much further west to Gallipoli, but once
again some of the Armenian revolutionaries didn’t get the message in
time and rebelled anyway.
Enver Pasha and his colleagues in Istanbul simply panicked. If the
Russians broke through in eastern Anatolia, all the Arab parts of the
empire would be cut off. So they ordered the deportation of all the
Armenians in the east to Syria—over the mountains, in winter, on foot.
(There was no railway yet.)
And since there were no regular troops to spare, it was mostly
Kurdish irregulars who guarded the Armenians on the way south.
Armenians defend the walls of Van
in spring 1915.
The Kurds shared eastern Anatolia with the Armenians, but the
neighbours had never been friendly. So many of the Kurdish escorts
assumed they had free license to rape, steal, and kill, and between
that, the lack of food, and the weather, up to half the deportees died.
To the extent that the Turkish government knew about it, it did nothing
to stop it.
More Armenians died in the sweltering, disease-ridden camps they were
confined in once they arrived in Syria. It was genocide through panic,
incompetence, and deliberate neglect, but it cannot be compared to what
happened to the European Jews. Indeed the large Armenian community in
Istanbul, far from the military operations in eastern Anatolia, survived
the war virtually unharmed.
If the Turks had only had the sense to admit what really happened 50
or 75 years ago, there would be no controversy now. The only duty of the
current generation is to acknowledge the past, not to fix it (as if they
could).
Instead there has been 100 years of blank denial, which is why the
issue is still on the international agenda. It will stay there until the
Turks finally come to terms with their past.
Jews Claim
That It Was Not Genocide - Unlike Their Holocaust® Story
QUOTE
The Turkish and some other sources claim that the
"intent to destroy," clause in the "Genocide Convention" has not been met,
which means even if the "whole or in part" is met without intent it is not
genocide.[15]
For example, the British Government made its position clear on this point in a
statement to the House of Lords in 2007:
... My Lords, I start with the most
significant part of the right reverend Prelate’s question. For this
Government, recognition of the so-called Armenian genocide is not a
condition of Turkey’s membership of the EU. I wish to be straightforward
and clear about that. Neither this Government nor previous British
Governments have judged that the evidence is sufficiently unequivocal to
persuade us that these events should be characterised as genocide under
the 1948 UN convention on genocide.
—"Lord" Triesman Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs for Parliamentary Affairs.[16]
UNQUOTE
Triesman is a Jew, "Lord" and communist; an odd
combination but when it comes lying Jews are as good as it gets.
Recognition of the Armenian Genocide
QUOTE
Armenian Genocide recognition refers
to the formal acceptance that the massacre and forced deportation of
Armenians
committed by the
Ottoman Empire in 1915-1923 constitute
genocide.
The overwhelming majority of historians as well as academic institutions on
Holocaust and Genocide Studies recognise the
Armenian Genocide. As of 2009, twenty-one countries such as
Canada,
Argentina
and Sweden and
forty-three states of the
United States of America have followed suit as well. Turkey denies the
Armenian genocide, but a few lone Turkish voices have recently joined
international critics in condemnation of
Ankara's
position.
UNQUOTE
Why is it being made into an issue? Money is a major motive. So is covering
their tracks.
United States Resolution On Armenian Genocide
Will happen or not. It has succeeded in annoying Turks
among others. The Wiki makes no mention the Jews as perpetrators or even as
victims but then the Wiki is a propaganda machine set up by two Jews.
The Real Jew - A Lesson From Turkey
by Arnold Leese
QUOTE
THE Turkish revolution
which dethroned the Sultans was Jewish. The Jews used Freemasonry as a tool. It
has been said with considerable truth that the Young Turks were old Jews.
The
active agency of Revolution was the Committee of Union and Progress. This was
fostered and manned by Freemasonry while Freemasonry was itself in the hands
of the Jews. The center of revolt was at Salonika where a majority of the
population was actually Jewish.
The
Jew Emmanuele Carasso used the Masonic Lodge "Macedonia Resorta" for the
secret meetings of the Committee of Union and Progress and when Sultan Abdul
Hamid was deposed Carasso was one of the four men who went to Yildiz to tell
the Sultan that his reign was at an end. The Committee of Union and Progress
firmly seated itself in the saddle of government with Mahommed V as puppet
Sultan.
The
Minister for the Interior of this regime was Talaat Bey. De Nogales in his
Four Years Beneath the Crescent (Chasles Scribners Sons, 1926 p. 26)
reveals Talaat as "the renegade Hebrew (Donme) of Salonika." A "Donme" is a
kind of Marrano Jew, a descendant of Jewish refugees in Turkey who pretended
to be Muslims. This fact of the Jewishness of Talaat is of great importance
and little known. The Encyclopedia Britannica, 12th edition, Vol. XXXI,
p. 1222, calls him "the sinister figure largely responsible for the downfall
of the Ottoman Empire."
In
The Cause of World Unrest he is stated to have been responsible,
"perhaps, more than anyone else for handing over Turkey to Germany and thus
encompassing her ruin." Talaat had been President of the Committee Party. De
Nogales in his work above cited says Talaat was "the principal organizer of
the massacres (of Armenian Christians) and deportations." Dr. H. Stuermer in
Two War Years in Constantinople (Hodder & Stoughton, 1917), says on p.
72 "Enver, and still more Talaat, who as Minister of Interior and really
Dictator of Turkey was principally responsible for the Armenian persecutions .
. . ."
Until now Talaat seems to have remained unrecognized by the world as a Jew
"patriot" who ruined his country and was responsible for the wholesale
slaughterer of Christians.
The
German Government made use of the services of a criminal Jew called Nelken to
gain control over the Young Turks. He called himself Mehmed Zekki Bey and
edited several newspapers in Constantinople. These and other Jew run
newspapers in the town did all that was possible to poison the Turkish mind
against the British.
Talaat's Finance Minister was another Jew Djavid Bey who arranged the finances
of revolution in Turkey with Jewish banks abroad. He had a Jew Messim Russo as
'his chef de cabinet.'
When Djavid Bey was finally hanged by Kamal Ataturk, "a number of great
financial concerns including the banking houses of the Rothschilds in Vienna
and London tried to persuade the English and French Governments and the
leading newspapers in both countries to use all their influence to make a
personal appeal for Djavid." (Grey Wolf by H. C. Armstrong published by
A. Barker, Ltd.) The French Freemason Sarraut actually visited Kamal in Angora
and appealed to him as a fellowmason to
spare Djavid's life. He was not successful. Kamal Ataturk who had been a
Freemason and a revolutionary, seemed to have changed his nature with his name
when he ceased to be Mustapha Kemal and closed the Masonic Lodges. His actions
were Aryan. His mother is said to have had Donme blood (Lewis Browne's How
Odd of God, 1935) but The Times 1 Nov. 1938, said she was an
Albanian who "may have transmitted the Nordic type to her boy." She had fair
hair and blue eyes. The Donme blood if present, must have been thin. Kamal's
Turkish patriotism was his only decent quality.
Another leading Jew of the Committee of Union and Progress was Refik Bey who
in 1939 was Prime Minister of Turkey under the name Refik Saydam.
During the First World War the Jew Carasso became a food controller in
Constantinople and as a result many people died of starvation. Meanwhile he
amassed a fortune of two million Turkish pounds which was seized from him
after the War. He saved some of it by suddenly claiming to be under Italian
protection. Another "Turkish patriot!"
In
The Cause of The World's Unrest published by Grant Richards, Ltd. in
1920 we learn that even the counter revolutionary forces were controlled and
made ineffective by Jews. The Commander being the Jew Renzi Bey. Jews
controlled the Revolutionary Press.
Whoever was prominent in the revolution and was not a Jew was a Freemason or
"synthetic Jew."
(Article by Arnold Leese, March, 1939)
UNQUOTE
Arnold was a sound sort of chap and knew the Near East so his views on Jews
are likely to be well informed. He was a vet specialising in camels, one who
thought Adolf was on the right lines.
