A Quarterly Journal for Free Historical Inquiry Published by: HBB Press
Historians Behind Bars Inconvenient History A Quarterly Journal for Free Historical Inquiry
Slightly over 30 years ago, James J. Martin, one of the deans of revisionist history of the twentieth century coined the term “Inconvenient History” with his collection of essays, The Saga of Hog Island. Long before Al Gore would speculate on the “Inconvenient Truth” of global warming, James Martin was already a veteran. Martin wrote:
“What the late Harry Elmer Barnes described in detail over the years as the ‘historical blackout’ with respect to World War Two revisionism has been the fate of other historical diversions from accepted convention in other areas. A venerable ploy of the attackers of inconvenient history has been to ridicule the limited or often make-shift nature of its production, to decry its lack of pretentious supporters, or to launch sly, malicious innuendo against its producers, but avoiding if at all possible coming to terms with substance.”
Today certain historical studies are strongly discouraged and in certain once-free democracies even outlawed. But a recent interest in discovering the facts about the twentieth century’s two world wars and their aftermath as well as the consequences of those events inspires us with new courage and optimism. Harry Barnes said that correction of the historical record could only occur in light of a calmer political atmosphere, and a more objective attitude. He was surprised to find that even 25 years after the Second World War, such an atmosphere had not yet developed.
Still, Barnes, Martin and their peers managed to create a set of solid historical research based on the facts. Once lost down the Orwellian ‘memory hole,’ many of these titles have resurfaced with some prominence in books by Ron Paul and Patrick J. Buchanan. Once again, the names of John T. Flynn, Garet Garrett, Charles Callan Tansill, William Henry Chamberlin, Captain Russell Grenfell, Walter Millis, Francis Neilson, F. J. P. Veale, and Luigi Villari can be found influencing contemporary thought and being sought out by a new generation who cannot be properly classified as “right” or “left” by contemporary standards.
Our new Quarterly Journal, Inconvenient History seeks to revive the true spirit of the historical revisionist movement; a movement that was established primarily to foster peace through an objective understanding of the causes of modern warfare.
In this effort, we are seeking authors, editors, translators, and advisors. If you are interested in the truth, regardless of how inconvenient it may be to this or that regime or political party or ideology, you’re perfect for us.
If you’re interested in revealing how the “west was lost” and the impact that modern myths of the “great war” and the “greatest generation” has had on international relations, you’ll want to consider Inconvenient History.
Revisionism was established as a progressive, some would say “liberal” methodology that originally set out to revise the harsh terms of the Treaty of Versailles following the First World War. That same methodology, although rather successful in the 1920’s and 30’s met tremendous resistance following the Second World War.
By the 1970’s and 80’s the term “revisionism” was often thought synonymous with far-right politics and fascist sympathies. Inconvenient History attempts to return to the roots of revisionism without any political agenda or desire to white wash totalitarian regimes. We are free-thinkers who seek to support the concept of intellectual freedom as a means to peace and understanding between nations. We are not interested in conspiracy theories; we are interested in revealing real history and supporting the freedom of historians to explore any topic they choose without fear of reprisal.
We anticipate continuing the efforts begun by Barnes, Martin and others to reveal how the Second World War got started, the taboo around the Holocaust story, the conduct of the war by both sides, and the consequences for the West and the world of the propaganda campaign that was constructed around this period.
Convenient history is like an ocean's waves, safely bringing the author's thesis to shore. Establishment historians are happy when the water table is high and courses are well-charted. Inconvenient history is the just the opposite. It is the jagged rocks protruding from the uncharted waters.
Are you with us?
English Forensic Archaeologist Sets Out To Prove Treblinka Massacre
QUOTE
At the website of the University of
Birmingham we find the following presentation of a young forensic archeologist
named Caroline Sturdy Colls [1]:
“Caroline is part of a small specialist team in the UK who work in the area of forensic archaeology. Caroline has a strong stomach and she doesn’t mind getting muddy – which helps when she works with the British Police on ‘no body’ cases – apparently it’s not as glamorous as it appears on CSI or Waking the Dead!.............
The holocaust mass graves which Ms. Colls is currently working at identifying are in fact those of the “pure extermination camp” of Treblinka II. This is made clear by a movie which can be downloaded at the same webpage. Below I provide a transcript of Ms. Sturdy Colls’ own narration (emphasis added):
It’s hard to believe that there has been no systematic search for the six million victims who perished in the Holocaust. 800,000 people were murdered here at Treblinka and their bodies were never found. It’s time we started looking.
I can only wish Ms. Sturdy Colls good luck in her work,
which is precisely the kind of effort that we holocaust revisionists
welcome.
In the meantime I advise her to read #Carlo Mattogno and
#Jürgen Graf's study
Treblinka: Extermination Camp or Transit Camp?,[11] especially the
chapters on previous forensic examinations and the alleged mass burials and
cremations (pp. 77-110, 137-157).
QUOTE
This particular initiative has
not been all over the main stream media. If she gets the results the Jews
want that may well change. It seems pretty obvious that 800,000 or so
corpses would leave plenty of evidence in a small area. Given that this work
has been done before it seems unlikely that she will prove more than a much
smaller number. The Wiki takes a clear position, saying that it really
happened -
Treblinka
extermination camp - Wikipedia, the free encyclopaedia. We will see what we
see. I suspect that it will prove to be not a lot followed up a news
blackout.
PS The Wiki does not bother
to pretend that it is not biased about #Mr
Mattogno. Amazon does not have their book any more but it is on line as
a .pdf - see
Treblinka: Extermination Camp or Transit Camp?
Treblinka: Extermination Camp or Transit Camp
Tells the world that Treblinka was a transit camp. It is
illegal to have this book in Germany. This suggests that there is something
wrong with the book or the people who made the law.
IDEAS LAB: Talent Bank
Caroline Sturdy Colls
She has a doctorate it seems.
Nazi Extermination Camp Of Sobibor - Fact Or Fiction?
QUOTE
Claiming he spent most of WWII as a prisoner of the Germans, John Demjanjuk
gained entry to the United States in 1952. In 1977, he was first sought out
by US Federal Prosecutors, who insisted he was a war criminal who murdered
Jews during WWII. Years later, in 1986, the former autoworker was extradited
to Israel where he stood trial, accused of herding Jews into “gas chambers.”
In 1988, he was sentenced to death for crimes against humanity after former
concentration camp inmates identified him as the notorious "Ivan the
Terrible", a guard at the purported death camp of Treblinka.
In 1993, the Israeli Supreme Court acquitted Demjanjuk with regard to the allegations that he was “Ivan the Terrible,” and his United States citizenship was restored shortly thereafter. Unfortunately, the travails of the hapless Seven Hills, Ohio resident did not end here.
No
Physical or Forensic Evidence to Prove Traditional View of Sobibor
Professor Christopher Browning is
considered one of the world’s foremost authorities on the WWII concentration
camps of Treblinka, Belzec and Sobibor, collectively known as the Operation
Reinhardt Camps. In his formal statement for the David Irving vs. Deborah
Lipstadt and Penguin Books libel trial in London in 2000, Browning admitted
that documents relating to mass gassings at these camps are scant. The same
holds true for the material evidence (the mass graves and remains of the
camps themselves): it is scarce.7
UNQUOTE
Eye witness testimony decades later is problematic. And that is assuming
good faith. When there is no other we can think we need better evidence.
Can 250 thousand murders leave no trace? I think not but when Jews allege
they are the victims it is different. Read for yourself. Think
for yourself. Decide for yourself.
Carlo Mattogno ex Wiki There is little information available about Mattogno aside
from
revisionist or
right-wing websites. According to these sources he was born in
Orvieto,
Italy and is
now living with his family in a suburb of Rome. It is claimed that he has
studied Latin, Greek, Philosophy, and has done Oriental and religious
studies. There is nonetheless no verifiable evidence concerning the date or
length of his studies nor whether he has graduated.[1] Mattogno is among those Holocaust deniers who design themselves as a
"school" of historiography. He first came to attention with two
pseudoscientific studies, Il rapporto Gerstein: anatomia di un falso
(The Gerstein Report – Anatomy of a Fraud) and Il mito dello
sterminio ebraico (The Myth of the Extermination of the Jews),
which he published in the Italian
neo-fascist publishing house Sentinella d'Italia in 1985. Further
outlets for his works are the neofacist publisher Edizioni di Ar, noted
holocaust denier
Germar Rudolf's Vierteljahreshefte für freie Geschichtsforschung
and Rudolf's Castle Hill Publishers in Uckfield, UK, the
revisionist L'Association des Anciens Amateurs de Récits de Guerres
et d'Holocaustes, and
Ahmed Rami's extreme right wing-islamistic
website "Radio
Islam".[1] Together with his brother, the Catholic fundamentalist Gian Pio Mattogno,
he regularly publishes in the extreme rightwing magazine Orion. Carlo
Mattogno collaborated with Holocaust denier
Jürgen Graf. He served on the Advisory Board of the "revisionist"
Institute for Historical Review and as an editor of its publication
Journal of Historical Review.[1] Currently, he is editorial advisor and columnist for the journal
published by the
Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust. That body also promotes
Holocaust denial.[2]
Jürgen Graf
ex Wiki
Graf studied
philology at the
University of Basel;
English,
Romance and
Scandinavian studies, and in 1979 completed his
licentiate.[1][7][8]
Graf spent several years working as a
school teacher teaching languages and later taught German at a
Taipei
school in
Taiwan.[1]
On his return to Basel, he worked as interrogator of
asylum
seekers at the receiving agency on the repurposed
Rhine cruise
ship Basilea. He described his experiences in his 1990 book The
Ship of Fools (Das Narrenschiff), over which he was accused of
xenophobia. By the early 1990s, Graf was a convert to
Holocaust denial, and was introduced to the field by his friend and
retired school teacher Arthur Vogt through the works of
Serge Thion,
Arthur Butz and
Wilhelm Stäglich.[1]
During the 1990s Graf published several controversial works on the subject
of
the Holocaust, his first titled The Holocaust on trial: Eyewitness
accounts versus natural laws (Der Holocaust auf dem Prüfstand:
Augenzeugenberichte versus Naturgesetze),[1][9]
several of his later books co-authored with the Italian Holocaust denier
#Carlo Mattogno.[1]
Graf distributed his book to journalists and parliamentarians, establishing
a reputation as a Holocaust denier. As the result, he was dismissed from his
teaching position; he was later employed in a private school in Basel,
teaching German to foreign students.[1] Graf's publications eventually led Swiss authorities to prosecute him for
violating Swiss anti-racism laws.[1]
Graf and his then publisher, Gerhard Förster, were tried by a Swiss court in
July 1998; Graf was sentenced to a substantial fine and 15-months
imprisonment.[1]
He fled the country while awaiting his appeal, traveling through Poland,
Russia, Ukraine and Turkey, ending in
Iran, where a
group of Iranian Holocaust deniers sheltered him in
Tehran.[1]
Graf subsequently relocated to Moscow, Russia, where he met and married a
Belarusian woman in 2001.[1]
He currently lives and works in Moscow as a translator.[1]
QUOTE
Carlo Mattogno (born 1951) is an
Italian writer and
Holocaust denier. He served on the Advisory Board of the
Institute for Historical Review and as an editor of its publication
Journal of Historical Review. As of 2016, Mattogno is editorial
advisor and columnist for a journal published by the
Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust, also a Holocaust denial
organisation.
UNQUOTE
This is the Wikipedia
at its corrupt worst, insinuating that Signor Mattogno is crooked but
pretending to play fair.
Jürgen Graf (born August 15, 1951 in
Basel) is a
Swiss author, former teacher and
Holocaust denier.[1][2][3][4][5][6]
Since August 2000 he has been living in exile, and is currently living in
Russia, working as a translator, with his wife.[1]
