John Thames

Professor/Doctor/Lord/Mr. Thames is very knowledgeable about Jews and their track record of political manipulation. This is one of his offerings which is spot on regarding the Zionist thugs who took over Palestine, the Stolen Land and called it Israel. He also wrote The Fraud of Zionism using a different pseudonym.

Having a bit of a tussle over at CounterKnowledge... I thought you might enjoy this cogent bit of material by John Thames.
 

“ACADEMIC CORRECTNESS”
Career academics, when confronted by the heresy of “Holocaust Denial”, invariably revert to the doctrine of “academic correctness”. Academic correctness is the doctrine that only university-trained historians are competent to pronounce on the truth of any supposedly settled historical controversy. This, of course, is the mentality of a priestly caste, self-appointed to pontificate to the people who lack their superior wisdom. It is not hard to puncture the illusions and pretensions of this pack of charlatans. In fact, it is ridiculously easy. These professional know-it-alls are constantly having to “revise” their findings on all kinds of subjects. This is a polite way of stating that they got it all wrong the first time. Naturally, they will not admit they got it wrong. Instead, they will argue that they were reasoning based on incomplete information and, naturally changed their minds when they got “fuller information”. The possibility that the hoax of the extermination of Europe’s Jews may have been hidden behind a fog of disinformation and that a hidden archive of “new information” may be awaiting them is, of course, too implausible to consider.

Now, as to the lengthy record of misinformation and deliberate lying achieved by these charlatans. I have already commented at length on the World War One and Pearl Harbor lies of these distinguished academics. Now I shall address another such example. For years now, the real history of the Zionist state has been hidden behind a propaganda legend of the “only democracy in the Middle East”. The average American remains abysmally ignorant of the real history of Zionism. Most Americans do not even know that the British were ever in control of Palestine between the two world wars. As for any knowledge of the British White Papers or Royal investigations during the 1920’s or 1930’s, one might as well speak Greek to the average American. The first major history to attempt to write the suppressed story for the benefit of an American audience was Dr. Robert John’s “The Palestine Diary" back in 1970. The publication of the book has a very interesting history. Dr. John [ mentioned in Israel, Zionism, and the Racial Double Standard - he also wrote Behind the Balfour declaration : the hidden origins of today's Mideast crisis ] submitted it to a great many university presses for publication. It was invariably rejected. The reasons for rejection had nothing to do either with the quality of the research or the writing, both of which were admittedly very good, but with fear of Zionist reprisal. Dr. John found that there was always at least one Zionist on the university review boards, who would immediately veto publication. Despite the fact that his book had the approval of, and a foreword by, world-renowned historian Arnold J. Toynbee, Toynbee, Dr. John was unable to find an academic publisher for the “Palestine Diary”. Eventually the “Palestine Diary” was published in Beirut by the Institute for Palestine Studies and in New York by New World Press [ http://www.newworldpressbooks.com/? ]. New World Press had its presses burned by unknown assailants and its entire run of copies destroyed. The publishers were themselves severely beaten with metal rods wrapped in rubber (a well-known Israeli torture technique). and their spines permanently injured. Dr. John, a consultant to American corporations on their legal obligations, was then driven from job to job as penalty for having published his book. The “lobby” had gotten him. Today, Dr. John’s book is regarded as a classic in its field. But in those days of historical cover up, the price of telling the truth was very high. Dr. John’s experience with the terrible power of Zionism parallels, in many ways, the ordeals of the Holocaust revisionists.

Now I shall review the lies and distortions of the historians of Zionism. For many decades the orthodox historians and media pundits have pretended that:
(1) there were never any Arabs in Palestine; (2) that if there were Arabs in Palestine they only arrived in response to the enormous prosperity the Jewish immigrants were supposedly creating (the Joan Peters “From Time Immemorial” nonsense - see Norman Finkelstein on the point  - Editor); (3) that the Arabs voluntarily vacated Palestine in 1948 rather than being expelled by Zionist force; (4) that the Jews in the 1948 war were confronted by Arabs who had them outnumbered and outgunned; (5) that the Jews did not commit atrocities in the war to deliberately terrorize the Arab civilian population, etc. Those lies have been repeated endlessly by “reputable people” in the universities and media for decades. Only now are those lies starting to break down. The Israeli revisionist historians ( Sima Flaphan, Benny Morris, Ilan Pape, Avi Shlaim, etc. ) have proved conclusively that the histories of their forefathers were shame-faced lies. Had any student of the 1950’s dared to make the charges since corroborated by Morris, et. al., he would have been denounced as a “conspiracy theorist” suffering from delusional right wing fantasies. It would be the same charge, in essence, as that leveled against the increasingly confirmed Pearl Harbor revisionists. In short, the decades old historiography of Zionism is as much a lie as the English saga of World War One, the myth of a German sneak attack on an innocent, unprovoked Russia, the myth of Roosevelt’s “surprise” at Pearl Harbor, the myth of Hitler’s hostility toward the British Empire, the myth of scientific socialism and the greatest myth of all, the so-called Holocaust®.

Academic correctness is the cover for a priestly caste of intellectual prostitutes, courageous in their timidity, devoted to the vested interests which employ them and willing to attack any myth of the political underground while fleeing in terror at any exposure of the ethnic blanket that tucks them beneath the unpleasant facts they are paid to ignore.



I need to add this info here:

 

The JIDF Guide to Hostile Facebook Groups

(please disregard the date above, this happened in 2008...we move it around on the site since our enemies often link to it telling people to join the groups which still remain...)

Through the creation of 4 proactive Facebook groups, The JIDF initiated a 35 day campaign urging 5,000 people to report all the following groups. During that time, 106 groups were deleted, impacting 125,290 hate mongering, terror supporting anti-Semites. The list that follows are the groups which remain. Many more groups crop up daily. At this point, it is impossible for The JIDF to continue listing all the new groups. Significant funds need to be raised in order to effectively fight this problem. Also, Jewish Leadership must coordinate with the management of Facebook to help develop plans to fight this problem. Since Facebook has ignored the thousands of complaints, the media has to do its job to report the problem in order to pressure Facebook to do something and the government should be alerted as to possible terrorist recruiting and activity.


HOW TO REPORT GROUPS:

1) Click on the group in question
2) Scroll down to the very bottom left corner
3) Click "report group"
4) Complete, by explaining the "Reason" (i.e.. attacks individuals or groups, it is a terrorist group, this group promotes violence, this group promotes hatred, and/or this group is for the destruction of Israel, and the USA, etc.)
5) Send!
_____________________________________________
ARABIC SITES:

If you see Arabic and don't understand, or if you'd like to write messages in Arabic, try this tool:

http://www.google.com/translate_t

Feel free to find more groups and post them to the discussion area (and please, ONLY IN THE DISCUSSION AREA) and they will be added.
_____________________________________________
HOW TO KNOW IF A SITE IS GONE:

If you click a link and it just goes to your Facebook homepage, it means WE HAVE DONE OUR JOB and the group has been deleted!
_____________________________________________
ALERT THE MEDIA:

http://www.thejidf.org/2008/05/sample-email-activsm-letter-media.html

-where you'll find a letter to copy and paste and a list of email address
_____________________________________________
FACEBOOK'S OWN RULES/TERMS:

One cannot "upload, post, transmit, share, store or otherwise make available any content that we deem to be harmful, threatening, unlawful, defamatory, infringing, abusive, inflammatory, harassing, vulgar, obscene, fraudulent, invasive of privacy or publicity rights, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable"

Also, one cannot "upload, post, transmit, share, store or otherwise make available content that would constitute, encourage or provide instructions for a criminal offense, violate the rights of any party, or that would otherwise create liability or violate any local, state, national or international law;"
_____________________________________________

So why are these groups able to exist? They have each been reported many times, so Facebook is aware of the problem, but not doing enough.
_____________________________________________
THE LIST

-please note, this is a list of groups we feel have a significant amount of Jew hatred and/or pro-Terrorist sentiment in them. while sometimes it is glaringly obvious, it might also be a rather subjective thing. therefore, we advise you to visit the groups and make your own decision as to whether or you should report them.

-also, the ones at the top have been remaining the longest and the "new additions" are added to the bottom:
 


Shi'aa + Sunna = Destroying Israel
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=15647020220
ZozZa Moi (Norway) (creator)
Samah Salameh (no network)
Lebanese Angel (Lebanon)
201 members
_____________________________________
الجبهة الشعبية لتحرير فلسطين
(The Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine)
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=6472453004
#John Thames Books

 

 

 

John Thames Books  
John Thames seems to be a pseudonym for an American academic who is very knowledgeable about the history of Jews circa 1880 to 1950. This makes him unpopular with aforesaid Jews, especially Zionist ditto.

The Formative Years Of The Israeli Labour Party The Organization Of Power 1919 - 1930
The story of Ahdut Ha'avodah-its origins in Russian political culture, its ideology, leadership, and factional struggles-up to the formation of Mapai in 1930. Essential background to the politics of independent Israel.

 

Sergio Minerbi’s excellent study, “Zionism and the Vatican” was not found. Minerbi is a Jew and a propagandist - see Pope John Paul II and the Jews: An Evaluation - Sergio I. Minerbi or the next one.

Sacrificing the Jews for Christianity
QUOTE
Sacrificing the Jews for Christianity
The Catholic Church's decisions regarding the beatification of its saints should not concern the Jews. One exception to this rule is the case of Pope Pius XII, who headed the Church while the Holocaust was ravaging World War II Europe.

What is at stake here is the Catholic perception of the Shoah - the worst nightmare in Jewish history, during which six million of our people were murdered. For Catholics, according to Pius XII (who reigned 1939-1958), it was a period during which the Church was a victim of Nazism. In a blatant effort to Christianize the Holocaust, Pope John Paul II used the symbol of the "six million" to represent the number of Polish people allegedly killed during the war. Edith Stein, although killed in Auschwitz as a Jew, was canonized by the Church as one of its martyrs. Auschwitz was defined by the same pope as "the Golgotha of the modern world," yet another expression of the Church's appropriation of the Shoah.

Sergio I. Minerbi, a former Israeli ambassador, has been a visiting professor of political sciences at the University of Haifa.
UNQUOTE
This is propaganda from a Jew.

  

5. Sergio Minerbi - The Vatican and the basilica of nativity

    "1 Sergio I. Minerbi, “The Treaty with the Vatican; achieved objectives and problems still open”, Gesher, N. 130, Winter 5755, pp. 42-52, (in Hebrew). ..."
    www.morasha.it/zehut/sm01_nativity.html

     

    Churchill and the Jews, 1900-1948 by Michael Cohen
    QUOTE
    Churchill's exalted position in the pantheon of Jewish and Zionist heroes has been almost taken for granted. This book looks beyond the myth and makes a sober reappraisal of the British statesman's attitudes and policies towards the Jews and to Zionism. Professor Cohen answers some challenging questions: Was Churchill ever really committed to the establishment of a Jewish state in Palestine, and why did the notorious White Paper of 1939 remain the law of the land throughout the entire term of Churchill's historic war ministry? And above all, could Prime Minister Churchill have done more to save the Jewish victims of the Nazi holocaust? Using primarily public archives, and Churchill's own published speeches and writings, Cohen concludes that Churchill never subscribed to the Zionists' ideology, but supported their cause, sporadically, for so long as he judged it to serve British interest.
    UNQUOTE
    When Churchill's affairs turned sour in 1929(?) a Jew dug him out. Support was intended as a bribe or not as the case may be. It worked presumably.

     

    Sir Winston write that infamous newspaper article in the Illustrated Sunday Herald for February 8, 1920, entitled “Zionism Versus Bolshevism: A Struggle For The Soul Of The Jewish People”?
    Yes. It is in the newspaper library at Colindale.

     

    The Hoax of the Twentieth Century by Arthur Butz
    QUOTE
    This book is a must read for anyone wanting to know 'the other side' of the story. Keeping clear of racial polemics, this book is written in a calm and most factual manner and presents clear and objective evidence that at least forces one to reconsider the classic historical arguments about a policy of deliberate extermination on the part of the Third Reich. There is no hate here. No so-called anti-Semitism. No pro-Nazi rhetoric. Anyone claiming so is either lying blatantly or simply hasn't read the book.

    Some holocaust authors claim they will not argue with revisionists like Butz! Of course! Because they simply cannot explain away or refute many of the arguments presented by the so-called 'other side'. Raul Hilberg is a classic example of a holocaust 'scholar' unable to successfully defend his case when skillfully probed by revisionists. His cross-examination at the Toronto trial of Holocaust denier Ernst Zundel was, in fact, a complete farce. He could not explain away many of the ambiguities in his book 'Destruction of the European Jews' and ended up making a very sorry spectacle of himself. Rudolf Vrba (I Cannot Forgive) was another who, when confronted on the witness stand, hemmed and hawed and finally cited, incredibly enough, 'poetic license' as the reason for many of the questionable claims recorded in his book.

    To the average person, I say, do your own research. Don't be afraid to consider other facts and points of view especially when they can be substantiated enough to claim some degree of credibility. This book by Arthur Butz is a big and important step in that direction. There are many footnotes and sources cited and the work is written in a very scholarly manner.

    One word of caution.

    Possession of works like this in some countries is considered a crime. For this reason alone, this book is a must read!!
    UNQUOTE
    Sounds pretty good to me.

     

    Doenitz at Nuremberg: A Reappraisal
    QUOTE
    I believe many people heard of the Nuremberg Trial, but I doubt many people know much of the details of the Trial. Nor the debate about the Trial ensued for decades after the Trial. Frankly I have to admit that I myself did not have any idea of it until recently when this book happened to cross me. I wish people read this book with an open-mind. And I wish this still be a country where Free Speech still prevails. I highly recommend this important book which should not escape the sight of any history-lover and professional historians. The power and merit of this book rest on the brave challenge, the sharp criticism on the sensitive subject--the Nuremberg Trial--that have made by those four hundred leading personalities in the military, law, arts, diplomacy, philosophy, history and religion all around the world (on Allied side) who were armed with richly embroidered knowledge of international law and equipped with the historical truth according to their own experience in the Second World War.

    The main points of their challenge and criticism lay in the followings:

    First, the Trial was a gross travesty on justice and illegal as far as international law concerned, because, in the first place, `according to the principles of international law universally recognized up to 1945 and explicitly admitted by the Allied and Associated Powers after the First World War, the Allies had no jurisdiction over the citizens of anther sovereign state for acts done in the service of that state'. In the second place, the law on the Trial was based on ex post facto law. They argued that that the definition of the crime and its punishment were fixed only after commission of the acts imputed alone radically has contravened the ancient principle of jurisprudence: `Nulla poena sine lege, nullum crimen sine lege.'(`No punishment without a law, no crime without a law.'); that the Resolution On Human Rights of the League of Nations was founded on this basic principle, which Article 11 of this resolution states: `No one may be punished for an act if at the time of this act a punishment for it was not pre-established in international law or in the laws of the county concerned.' In the third place, the trial violated one of the basic principles of law that `he who judges in his own case is not only a suspect and therefore a challengeable judge; he is simply not a judge. If he sits as judge, the illegality of the process and the nullity of the sentence are absolute and incurable'. In the forth place, the Charter of the Tribunal abolished the rules of evidence which in every civilized country have been introduced for the protection of accused persons against prejudiced and unreliable assertions.
    UNQUOTE
    A Customer reads as an honest man. The Chief Justice of America referred to it as a high class lynching party.

     

    Radhabinod Pal
    QUOTE
    Justice Radhabinod Pal (27 January 1886 – 10 January 1967) was an Indian jurist. He was the Indian member appointed to the International Military Tribunal for the Far East's trials of Japanese war crimes committed during the second World War.
    UNQUOTE
    JT quotes him thus:-
    Justice Rahobinade Pal’s classic definition of a war crime as “an act perpetrated by both sides in a war, which can safely be blamed on the losing side without undue embarrassment to the winning side”?

    Further as:-
    QUOTE
    As to the charge that anti-Semites “hate” Jews for no reason, Ron might try reading the works of professor Kevin MacDonald. Jews have done a lot of “hating” of the non-Jewish world. Anyone who reads the Talmudic scriptures quickly realizes this. The treatment of the Palestinians might qualify as “hate”. Ditto with the behaviour of the Jewish Bolsheviks in Russia. And, of course, there may be a great deal of very justifiable “hatred” when this hoax of “six million” is finally exposed.

     

    Made in Russia: The Holocaust (9780939484300): Carlos Porter
    QUOTE
    Western Civilization should be indebted to Mr. Porter for his very correct study of the Soviets phony 'war crimes' "evidence" that got many innocent people hung at the UN's Nuremberg 'hang-fest' following the secession of hostilities in ETO following WWII! The Soviets, as young Jewish Revisionist Dave Cole in his Auschwitz video, didn't even teach that the fabled 'six million' dead Khazars, in 'the holacau$t', happened. The Commies taught that the Slavs [the original slaves!] were the ones that the Nutzis were 'exterminating'. "The 'holacau$t' was indeed manufactured in the Soviet Union, which was created by Rockefeller and the Wall Street boys back in Oct. 1917, by V.I. Lenin, based also on the money he made from the 'Protocols of Zion that he penned in 1904-05, at the be-hest of Rocky and his agent, Jacob Schiff!

    Mr. Porter's book should be on the same shelf in all Patriotic Amer-I-cans home libraries as David Irving's Nuremberg, the Final Battle book!
    Bravo, Carlos Whitlock Porter!
    UNQUOTE
    Another sound source.

 

 

Errors & omissions, broken links, cock ups, over-emphasis, malice [ real or imaginary ] or whatever; if you find any I am open to comment.
 
Email me at Mike Emery. All financial contributions are cheerfully accepted. If you want to keep it private, use my PGP KeyHome Page

Updated on 10/04/2019 19:52