The Second Vatican Council was about policy updates, introducing a major shift regarding the Jews, the Christ killers. Was it justified? Who brought it about? Why did they do it? Is the Pope a Catholic? These are important questions. The last of them is widely used as a rhetorical question; one so obvious that no answer should be necessary. There is another rhetorical question about bears. Nobody argues with that one.
The position of the Pope is less clear. Recall that Antonio Gramsci, the leading theoretician of the Communists in Italy knew that his main obstacle was Holy Mother Church. Antonio's approach to destroying was to infiltrate, to attack from the top down, in contrast to Marx, who advocated doing it from the bottom up. Crypto-Jews have wormed their way into high office. Some are named in Catholic Church Infiltrators. David Maria Jaeger was just one such. Answers were published under the pseudonym Maurice Pinay.
See alsoSecond Vatican Council ex Metapedia
Crypto-Judaic and Talmudic subversion
QUOTE
Second Vatican Council
The Second Vatican Council, commonly known as Vatican II, was a Judeo-Masonic coup d'église aimed at capturing the Catholic Church.
A number of the most important documents associated with the Council came about directly due to the workings of some crypto-Jews operating within the structure of the Church; Augustin Bea, Johannes Oesterreicher, and Gregory Baum being some of the most notable figures involved.[1] There was also external influence from organised and open Jewry, who were aided and abetted in their campaign by turn-coats within the Church. The main documents effected by this were Nostra Aetate, Dignitatis Humanae and Unitatis Redintegratio.Freemasonry creates a New Mass
Protocols of the Elders of Zion
One of the most controversial outcomes following on as a result of the Second Vatican Council was the usurpation of the Tridentine Mass in the Latin Church and its replacement with the Novus Ordo in 1969, which was radically different in orientation. This destroyed the most significant act of public worship for religious Catholics. Its primary creator was "Cardinal" Annibale Bugnini who was the Secretary of the Pontifical Preparatory Commission on the Liturgy at the Second Vatican Council and has been accused of being a freemason.[2][3][4]
“ When the time comes finally to destroy the papal court the finger of an invisible hand will point the nations towards this court. When, however, the nations fling themselves upon it, we shall come forward in the guise of its defenders as if to save excessive bloodshed. By this diversion we shall penetrate to its very bowels and be sure we shall never come out again until we have gnawed through the entire strength of this place. ” —Protocol #17, We Shall Destroy the Clergy.
UNQUOTE
Perhaps this is overstated but it is nearer the truth than the
Wikipedia's bland claims.
Second Vatican Council - ex Wiki
QUOTE
The Second Vatican Council (also known colloquially as
Vatican II) addressed relations between the
Roman Catholic Church and the modern world. It was the twenty-first
Ecumenical Council of the Catholic Church and the second to be held at
St. Peter's Basilica in the
Vatican. It opened under
Pope John XXIII on 11 October 1962 and closed under
Pope
Paul VI on 8 December 1965. Of those who took part in the council's opening
session, four have become
pontiffs to date:
Cardinal Giovanni Battista Montini, who on succeeding Pope John XXIII took the
name of
Paul
VI; Bishop Albino Luciani, the future
Pope John Paul I; Bishop Karol Wojtyła, who became
Pope John Paul II; and Father Joseph Ratzinger, present as a theological
consultant, who became
Pope Benedict XVI........
One of the more controversial documents[citation
needed] was
Nostra Aetate,
which stated that the Jews of the time of Christ, taken indiscriminately, and
all Jews today are no more responsible for the death of Christ than Christians.
UNQUOTE
The Wiki beats about the bush, not telling us who fed in the ideas.
First Vatican Council ex Wiki
-
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Vatican_Council
QUOTE
The First Vatican Council was convoked by
Pope
Pius IX on 29 June 1868, after a period of planning and preparation that
began on 6 December 1864.[1]
This twentieth
ecumenical council of the
Catholic Church,[2]
held three centuries after the
Council of Trent, opened on 8 December 1869 and adjourned on 20 October
1870.[1]
Unlike the five earlier General Councils held in Rome, which met in the
Lateran Basilica and are known as Lateran Councils, it met in the
Vatican Basilica, hence its name. Its best-known decision is its definition
of
papal infallibility.
The Council was convoked to deal with the contemporary problems of the rising influence of rationalism, liberalism, and materialism.[2] Its purpose was, besides this, to define the Catholic doctrine concerning the Church of Christ.[3] There was discussion and approval of only two constitutions: the Dogmatic Constitution on the Catholic Faith and the First Dogmatic Constitution on the Church of Christ, the latter dealing with the primacy and infallibility of the bishop of Rome.[3] The first matter brought up for debate was the dogmatic draft of Catholic doctrine against the manifold errors due to Rationalism.[4]
Papal infallibility
The doctrine of papal infallibility was not new and had been used by Pope Pius in defining as dogma, in 1854, the Immaculate Conception of Mary, the mother of Jesus.[5] However, the proposal to define papal infallibility itself as dogma met with resistance, not because of doubts about the substance of the proposed definition, but because some considered it inopportune to take that step at that time.[5] McBrien divides the bishops attending Vatican I into three groups. The first group, which McBrien calls the "active infallibilists", was led by Manning and Senestrey. This group took an extreme view that argued that all papal teachings were infallible and that papal infallibility was the foundation of the church's infallibility. According to McBrien, the majority of the bishops were not so much interested in a formal definition of papal infallibility as they were in strengthening papal authority and, because of this, were willing to accept the agenda of the infallibilists. A minority, some 20 percent of the bishops, opposed the proposed definition of papal infallibility on both ecclesiastical and pragmatic grounds. They opposed the ultramontane centralist model of the Church because, in their opinion, it departed from the ecclesiastical structure of the early Christian church. [6] From a pragmatic perspective, they feared that defining papal infallibility would alienate some Catholics, create new difficulties for union with non-Catholics, and provoke interference by governments in Church affairs.[1] Those who held this view included most of the German and Austro-Hungarian bishops, nearly half of the Americans, one third of the French, most of the Chaldaeans and Melkites, and a few Armenians.[1] Only a few bishops appear to have had doubts about the dogma itself.[1]
Homosexual Abuse In The Vatican II Church ex Metapedia
QUOTE
Homosexual abuse in the Vatican II Church refers to actions of
homosexual abuse[1][2]
committed by
Novus Ordo "priests" following the liberalising actions of the
Second Vatican Council. The most numerous cases of abuse took place in the
United States; typically amongst liberal Irish-American priests; and in
Ireland
itself. Though it also occurred to a lesser degree in other countries such as
Belgium and
Canada. The
largest number of cases took place in the mid-1960s and the mid-1980s, the
latter during the times of
Karol
Wojtyła.
There is controversy over the extent of the abuse and whether disproportionate coverage is given to cases in the Vatican II Church, over other areas of society or religions. Cardinal Óscar Maradiaga, a Honduran archbishop stated that the Jewish-controlled press in the United States; particularly the Sulzberger family owned New York Times and Boston Globe; were unfairly singling out the Church for revanchist propaganda reasons.[3] Indeed one of the most defamatory journalists involved, Laurie Goodstein of the NYT,[4][5] is a Jewess.
Typically it is presented as a "paedophile
scandal", however its nature is contentious. From the available statistics on
proven abuse cases, 80% of the victims were males and mostly post-pubescent;[6]
fitting the definition of homosexual, rather than paedophile abuse.[2]
This is deliberately obscured because the Western media supports homosexuality.
Though the two
Sexual Bolshevik perversions are in any case connected;
Paul Shanley, a pro-Marxist homosexual abuser "priest" was even a supporter
of
NAMBLA.
UNQUOTE
Holy Mother Church has been infiltrated in order to ruin it.
-
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Council_of_Trent
QUOTE
The Council of Trent (Latin:
Concilium Tridentinum) was an
Ecumenical Council of the
Roman Catholic Church. It is considered to be one of the Church's most
important[1]
councils. It convened in
Trent (the
capital of the
Prince-Bishopric of Trent of the
Holy Roman Empire, in
Italy) between December 13, 1545, and December 4, 1563 in twenty-five
sessions for three periods. During the pontificate of
Pope
Paul III the Council fathers met for the first through eighth sessions in
Trent (1545–7), and for the ninth through eleventh sessions in
Bologna
(1547).[2]
Under
Pope Julius III, the Council met in Trent (1551–52) for the twelfth through
sixteenth sessions, and under
Pope
Pius IV, the seventeenth through twenty-fifth sessions took place in Trent
(1559–63).
The Council issued condemnations on what it defined as Protestant heresies and defined Church teachings in the areas of Scripture and Tradition, Original Sin, Justification, Sacraments, the Eucharist in Holy Mass and the veneration of saints. It issued numerous reform decrees.[3] By specifying Catholic doctrine on salvation, the sacraments, and the Biblical canon, the Council was answering Protestant disputes.[1] The Council entrusted to the Pope the implementation of its work; as a result, Pope Pius IV issued the Tridentine Creed in 1565; and Pope Pius V issued in 1566 the Roman Catechism, in 1568 a revised Roman Breviary, and in 1570 a revised Roman Missal, thus standardizing what since the 20th century has been called the Tridentine Mass (from the city's Latin name Tridentum), and Pope Clement VIII issued in 1592 a revised edition of the Vulgate.[4]
The Council of Trent, delayed and interrupted several times because of
political or religious disagreements, was a major reform council and the most
impressive embodiment of the ideals of the
Counter-Reformation.[4]
It would be over 300 years until the
next Ecumenical Council. When announcing
Vatican II,
Pope John XXIII stated that the precepts of the Council of Trent continue to
the modern day, a position that was reaffirmed by
Pope
Paul VI.[5]
UNQUOTE
This one is history.