Who, Whom? is Comrade Lenin's shorthand for:
Who will do what unto whom?
Who will be the winner is the great struggle between Capitalism and Socialism? In the event he won, in the short term. Some years later, from 1961 people expressed their real views about his system, the Dictatorship Of The Proletariat in the Deutsche Demokratische Republik, East Germany by voting with their feet. Over three million of them left for the West.
One result was the Berlin Wall. It was there to keep them in, not others out. A somewhat similar view was put by the Weather Underground.
They were a bunch of self-righteous grossly extremist, Racists, largely Jews full of hate. They were intent on the overthrow of the American government in order to establish another Soviet state.
One of Weather's sayings was:-
The issue is not the issue
Decoded it means:-
The issue is not the real issue; it is just an excuse to incite hatred, to
achieve power.
They really meant it. Hillary Clinton really meant it; they all did. Resentment leads to hate, violence & power. What were they about? See the Conclusion and ask yourself whether they are succeeding.
Who, Whom? ex Wiki
Who, whom? (Russian: кто кого?, kto kogo?; Russian pronunciation: [kto.kɐˈvo]) is a Bolshevist principle or slogan which was formulated by Lenin in 1921.Lenin is supposed to have stated at the second All-Russian Congress of Political Education Departments, on 17 October 1921,
- Весь вопрос—кто кого опередит?
- "The whole question is—who will overtake whom?"
Leon Trotsky used the shortened "who whom" formulation in his 1925 article, "Towards Capitalism or Towards Socialism?"[1]
The shortened form was invoked by Joseph Stalin in 1929, in a speech to the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, which also gave the formula its "aura of hard-line coercion" (while Lenin's phrase indicated a willingness to embrace economic competition):
- "The fact is, we live according to Lenin's formula: Kto–kogo?: will we knock them, the capitalists, flat and give them (as Lenin expresses it) the final, decisive battle, or will they knock us flat?"[2]
It came to be used as a formula describing the inevitability of class struggle, i.e. who (which of two antagonists) will dominate the other. In this view, all compromises and promises between enemies are just expedients – tactical manoeuvres in the struggle for mastery.[3][4]