Election 2016 - A Battle Won, A War Yet To Win

The Right Stuff is a worthy source, well read too. You don't agree? Read for yourself. Think for yourself. Decide for yourself. Complain to me or complain to them - if you want but know that abuse is an admission of failure. Reasoned arguments are different. They suggest that you have a brain. NB Lincoln talked the talk but when it came to the point he was a War Monger just like Obama, the black with a Nobel Peace PrizeForged Birth Certificate. NB Don won, America won, the world won on 8 November 2016.

With Malice Toward Many

With malice toward none, with charity for all, with firmness in the right as God gives us to see the right, let us strive on to finish the work we are in, to bind up the nation's wounds, to care for him who shall have borne the battle and for his widow and his orphan, to do all which may achieve and cherish a just and lasting peace among ourselves and with all nations..
--Abraham Lincoln, 2nd Inaugural Address

Now go, attack the Amalekites and totally destroy all that belongs to them. Do not spare them; put to death men and women, children and infants, cattle and sheep, camels and donkeys.'
--1 Samuel 15:3

The Jubilee of Mercy decreed by Pope Francis limps to a close in December, but it is not exactly wrapping up the way the current successor to St. Peter hoped. In the burned out heartland of old Christendom, the Pope’s neo- pagan flock is rejecting his suicidal brand of demographic ecumenism in favor of a more muscular European identity. In Latin America, Liberation Theology—a Judaized Catholic syncretism [ synthesis ] with Marxism—is yielding to food riots, gang violence, and the rising cult of Santa Muerte. And in America, home to more Roman Catholics than any other nation on Earth, voters overwhelming rejected Francis’ last minute plea to reject “physical and social walls” that “close in some and exclude others.” 52% of American Catholics defied their bishops and voted for Donald Trump (a number that includes Hispanic Catholics). In fact, the entire Vatican II edifice of puerile modernism, liturgical dumbfuckery, and devotional malaise is teetering towards collapse. Catholics, it seems, are less interested in social justice and building “man’s habitat on Earth” alongside Luciferian globalists than in seeing to the survival of their children and the salvation of their eternal souls. Mother Teresa of Calcutta may be our newest saint, but it is Fr. Hamel of Saint-Etienne-de-Rouvray who is attracting a personal cult. His last words to his Muslim killers, uttered before the Real Presence, were “Begone, Satan!”

In the pre-Christian world, mercy was generally seen for what it is: a political stratagem that helped consolidate power by enlarging the circle of those indebted to the victors. Julius Caesar was renowned for his mercy ]. Darius the Great buried the memory [ of ] the hated Assyrians by publicly practicing tolerance and forgiveness toward the vanquished.

It was only in Christian Europe that a veneer of doctrinal piety was added to what had always been considered a political expediency. And make no mistake, this served our people well for a long time. It fostered the formation of the enduring alliances and transnational allegiances that gave birth to a universal European, Christian identity. Mercy practiced toward redeemable ethnic cousins solidifies blood ties and tamps down counterproductive internecine strife.

But here’s the thing about mercy: it is a kind of implicit white privilege, the privilege of victors and conquerors. We know that in most of the world and throughout most of history, the victors have generally elected to satiate their desire for vengeance rather than indulge in the more spiritual pleasure of mercy. The practice of eating an enemy’s brains and testicles is still practiced by chieftain-Presidents in “modern” Africa. The Japanese rape of Nanking mirrored the Israelite treatment of the Amalekites. Certainly, the Jews showed no mercy to the conquered German national socialists at Nuremberg.

Aside from the obvious psycho-evolutionary basis for this kind of behavior, we ought to ask “why do they act in this way? Why is it that, seemingly alone among humanity, white Westerners fetishize mercy toward the defeated into what amounts to political masochism?”

Simply put, it is because other ethnic groups understand the eternal truth that mercy in the midst of battle is not mercy at all: it is betrayal. Is it mercy to allow the enemy who showed up at your gates threatening to slaughter you, rape your women, and enslave your children to enter the city? Of course not! Like every other virtue, mercy must be weighed in the balance against its costs. After the enemy is decimated, his temples thrown down, his people dispersed, then perhaps the benefits of mercy outweigh its potential risks. Perhaps. Lincoln’s vaunted rhetoric in his 2nd Inaugural Address would not have been possible were it not for the ruthlessness of General Sherman’s march to the sea. Where was Lincoln’s mercy then?

The problem with mercy in an egalitarian democracy is that it misconstrues the nature of the conflict. In such societies, politics is an eternal war. There are no final, decisive battles. An election—even an election as momentous as the one that elevated the God Emperor—does nothing more or less than create the opportunity to implement an agenda. The agenda can only be implemented through the force of will, and this necessitates the crushing of the enemy’s will since, like it or not, they are still alive.

Basic bitch conservatives have never understood this because they never really understanding anything important or eternal. They see the election itself as the battle, as if a victory at the polls has some kind of intrinsic value. To them, an electoral win simply provides an opportunity to retire to the fainting couch and recuperate while the Left is temporarily blocked from accelerating the slide into degeneracy. Part of their recuperation plan is a generous heaping of self-congratulatory, fetished mercy towards those who only days before were promising to exterminate them.

This has to end, and Christians and Catholics who want to preserve our people and our culture must re-discover their latent faculty of discernment. “There a time for all things under Heaven,” including vengeance and ruthless determination. In the coming days, weeks and months, we will all be tempted to pre-mature displays of mercy. Last night, my wife—a reasonably based Entwife who proudly voted for Donald Trump—was reading the facebook posts of some of her GLBTQ friends. After a few minutes, she asked me: “Why are these people so afraid? Is Trump really going to hurt them? I don’t want them to suffer.”

My first reaction was to smile and dismiss this as harmless political naivete. My old cuckservative self would have done so. This time, however, I took the opportunity to remind her of what these poor, suffering GLBTQ’s were promising to do to us and our children had they won the election: destroy Christianity, force demonic gender ideology on our children, push the Overton window towards toleration of Paedophilia, force Catholic hospitals to perform abortions, ever-more degenerate media content, etc. How afraid were we? How much mercy and restraint would they have shown our family?

The battle rages on, fam. The only thing that has changed is that we now hold the high ground. We must steel ourselves to be more Sherman than Lincoln. There may be time for mercy in some distant future in which we have secured the existence of our people and our way of life. Until then, we must proceed apace, with malice towards many.

 


 

 

Top Stories 2016
3 December 2016

Canadian Government Inciting Third World Invasion From Mexico

http://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/britains-plan-to-tame-trump-3qcb8vfql

 

http://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/britains-plan-to-tame-trump-3qcb8vfql

http://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/britains-plan-to-tame-trump-3qcb8vfql
QUOTE
A secret memo from the British ambassador to the United States has laid bare how the UK plans to shape Donald Trump’s presidency so he helps to boost Britain’s national interests.

In a leaked telegram, written just as Trump was surging to victory last week, Sir Kim Darroch boasted that the UK is the best placed of any nation to steer the new president’s foreign policy and encourage his more extreme ideas to “evolve”.

A Nation Decides: Find out how Donald Trump won the US presidency (website only)

Darroch describes Trump as “open to outside influence” from Britain if Theresa May launches a diplomatic offensive to win him over.

Whitehall sources say ministers, generals and intelligence chiefs are drawing up plans to influence Trump on such issues as Nato, Iran, Russia and immigration in an effort to help the UK exploit his victory and curb his more extreme views.

In the memo, written in the early hours of Wednesday morning, Darroch said the “electoral earthquake” that had propelled Trump to power had led to “fear and loathing” in Washington.

The “president-elect is above all an outsider and unknown quantity, whose campaign pronouncements may reveal his instincts, but will surely evolve and, particularly, be open to outside influence if pitched right,” he wrote.

“Having, we believe, built better relationships with his team than have the rest of the Washington diplomatic corps, we should be well placed to do this.”

The emergence of the memo is potentially embarrassing for the government since it shows that Britain’s top diplomat in America regards the most outspoken presidential candidate of modern times as inexperienced and impressionable. But it helps to explain a charm offensive launched by May and Boris Johnson, the foreign secretary, with Trump’s inner circle over the past three days.

Last night Nigel Farage became the first British politician to hold talks with the president-elect, during an hour-long meeting at Trump Tower in New York.

The prime minister had a telephone call with Trump on Thursday in which he expressed a desire to renew the special relationship.

When people demand change, it is the job of politicians to respond

After a call with the vice-president-elect, Mike Pence, on Thursday, Johnson spoke on Friday night to Senator Jeff Sessions and Newt Gingrich, both of whom are tipped to be in Trump’s cabinet. In addition, one of Trump’s transition team, Marsha Blackburn, was in London last week as part of a delegation of congressmen who met Foreign Office ministers.

In an attempt to cement relations, Johnson will boycott an EU “panic meeting” today called to discuss Trump’s win on the grounds that “an act of democracy has taken place”, not a crisis for the West.

The foreign secretary’s spokesman said the meeting was “unnecessary” and added: “We will be working with the current and future administration to ensure the best outcomes for Britain.”

A ComRes poll last night found that only 15% of British voters think Trump will be a good president.

The prime minister will use her first big speech on foreign policy this week to say the discontent with globalisation that gave rise to Brexit and Trump’s victory cannot be ignored.

In a speech tomorrow night at the Mansion House, May will argue that for globalisation and liberalism to survive, governments have to ensure that the less well off benefit as well as the rich and powerful.

She will declare that we are living in a “world transformed” by a “clear, determined decision to leave the European Union” and “a new president-elect in the US who defied the polls and the pundits”.

She will say: “When people demand change, it is the job of politicians to respond. These people — often those on modest to low incomes living in rich countries like our own — see their jobs being outsourced and wages undercut. They see their communities changing around them and don’t remember giving their permission for that to be the case.

“If we believe, as I do, that liberalism and globalisation continue to offer the best future for our world, we must deal with the downsides and show that we can make these twin forces work for everyone.”

May’s words suggest that she will press ahead with a hard Brexit prioritising immigration controls — a key concern of those voters — over access to the European markets.

Downing Street is now pressing for the prime minister to visit Trump in the White House as early as February. Ministerial aides say Trump will then be invited to Britain later in the year and given the “red carpet” treatment.

Concerns that Trump will not continue to support Nato have prompted a flurry of Whitehall memos about his intentions. Officials have already drawn up a paper listing all his campaign pronouncements on Nato and how Britain should respond.

Last night Jens Stoltenberg, Nato’s secretary-general, issued a stark warning to the president-elect. “Going it alone is not an option, either for Europe or for the United States,” he said.

A cabinet source said: “One of the government’s first priorities was to assess what Trump’s comments about Nato meant for the UK and what strategy we would pursue in dealing with them.”

Intelligence chiefs have also been asked to assess how Trump’s warmth towards Vladimir Putin’s Russia could affect counter-terrorism strategy and Syria policy. Similar papers are being drawn up on Trump’s attitude to Muslim immigration and the Iran nuclear deal.

Darroch’s election night memo gives a fascinating insight into the unfolding of Trump’s triumph. He reveals that Trump was told he had lost before the votes were counted and Hillary Clinton’s camp was already celebrating victory.

The ambassador delivered a withering verdict on Clinton, calling her a “deeply flawed campaigner, who could never find a strategic message as compelling as ‘Make America Great Again’”. He said Trump’s win was due in part to a “stroke of luck in the last two weeks with an FBI investigation that turned the spotlight onto his opponent rather than himself”.

Darroch wrote: “At 6pm this evening, Donald Trump was perhaps the only person in America who still believed he had a chance . . . The Trump team, some of whom we were with early in the evening, were sure they had lost; the Clinton campaign was celebrating. By 7pm, Fox news was privately telling the campaign that they were going to call the race for Clinton before 10pm . . . then the results started to come in.”
UNQUOTE
Interesting times but worrying too.