Marco de Wit, writing in the Occidental Observer and in English looks at Milton Friedman's track record, considering his motivation. Mr de Wit's answer is that Milt is a Jew and one of the Enemy Within. What is Marco's background? The Wikipedia tells us what it tells us at https://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marco_de_Wit. It is in Finnish so it may not help. His website, Marco de Witin tabu uses English as well.
His thesis is that a number of movements run by Jews are designed to advance their interests at our expense. Is he wrong? I think not. Do you agree? Read for yourself. Think for yourself. Decide for yourself.
Did Milton Friedman’s Libertarianism Seek to Advance Jewish Interests?
QUOTE
In his Culture of Critique trilogy Kevin MacDonald shows how many Jewish intellectual movements have developed a culture of critique that undermines those ideas and values that protect White group interests and cohesion.These Jewish intellectual movements include the Frankfurt School (philosophy, sociology), Boasian Anthropology, Freudian psychoanalysis, the #New York Intellectuals (literature), Marxism and even Neoconservatism.
UNQUOTE
My answer is a very emphatic YES! See A Response.
Frankfurt School
Was a group of Jews who fled Germany when Adolf came into power. They went to America to Subvert that instead. They are succeeding as I write in January 2021 with Biden on course to take over, followed briskly Harris, a ghastly Third World alien who hates Americans.
Boasian Anthropology
Follow the link - Boas' Anthropology
Milton Friedman's Libertarian Attack On Western Civilization - A Response
QUOTE
The theme of On Liberty by John Stuart Mill is that one should be free to do whatever one wants as long as it does not harm others. It sounds reasonable at first glance. It also tells us that we have no obligation to our parents or our children; that we can care for our families if we see fit, but not otherwise. The same idea is that we have no duty to Queen and Country.
Do Jews care about their families, their tribe, their [ stolen ] land? Yes.
Does their commitment to their own translate into hatred of others, the rest of us, the goyim? Biden and Harris will be taking over America and destroying it. Who is in the shadows behind them?
UNQUOTE
You might agree.
On Liberty ex Wiki
On Liberty is a philosophical essay by the English philosopher John Stuart Mill. Published in 1859, it applies Mill's ethical system of utilitarianism to society and state Mill suggests standards for the relationship between authority and liberty. He emphasizes the importance of individuality, which he considers prerequisite to the higher pleasures—the summum bonum of utilitarianism. Furthermore, Mill asserts that democratic ideals may result in the tyranny of the majority. Among the standards proposed are Mill's three basic liberties of individuals, his three legitimate objections to government intervention, and his two maxims regarding the relationship of the individual to society.On Liberty was a greatly influential and well-received work. Some classical liberals and libertarians have criticized it for its apparent discontinuity with Utilitarianism, and vagueness in defining the arena within which individuals can contest government infringements on their personal freedom of action. The ideas presented in On Liberty have remained the basis of much political thought. It has remained in print since its initial publication. A copy of On Liberty is passed to the president of the British Liberal Democrats as a symbol of office. Mill's marriage to Harriet Taylor Mill greatly influenced the concepts in On Liberty, which was published shortly after she died.
John Stuart Mill ex Wiki
QUOTE
John Stuart Mill (20 May 1806 – 7 May 1873), usually cited as J. S. Mill, was an English philosopher, political economist, and civil servant. One of the most influential thinkers in the history of classical liberalism, he contributed widely to social theory, political theory, and political economy. Dubbed "the most influential English-speaking philosopher of the nineteenth century", he conceived of liberty as justifying the freedom of the individual in opposition to unlimited state and social control.Mill was a proponent of utilitarianism, an ethical theory developed by his predecessor Jeremy Bentham. He contributed to the investigation of scientific methodology, though his knowledge of the topic was based on the writings of others, notably William Whewell, John Herschel, and Auguste Comte, and research carried out for Mill by Alexander Bain. He engaged in written debate with Whewell.
A member of the Liberal Party and author of the early feminist work The Subjection of Women, Mill was also the second Member of Parliament to call for women's suffrage after Henry Hunt in 1832.
UNQUOTE
He was one of the better political philosophers.
Boasian
Anthropology ex Wiki
Boasian anthropology was based on the four-field model of anthropology
uniting the fields of
cultural anthropology,
linguistic anthropology,
physical anthropology, and
archeology under the umbrella of anthropology. It was based on an
understanding of human cultures as malleable and perpetuated through social
learning, and understood behavioral differences between peoples as largely
separate from and unaffected by innate predispositions stemming from human
biology—in this way it rejected the view that cultural differences were
essentially biologically based. It also rejected ideas of cultural evolution
which ranked societies and cultures according to their degree of
"evolution", assuming a single evolutionary path along which cultures can be
ranked hierarchically, rather Boas considered societies varying complexities
to be the outcome of particular historical processes and circumstances—a
perspective described as
historical particularism.
Another important aspect of Boasian anthropology was its perspective of cultural relativism which assumes that a culture can only be understood by first understanding its own standards and values, rather than assuming that the values and standards of the anthropologist's society, can be used to judge other cultures. In this way Boasian anthropologists did not assume as a given that non-Western societies are necessarily inferior to Western ones, but rather attempt to understand them on their own terms. From this approach also stemmed an investment in understanding and protecting cultural minorities, and in critiquing and relativizing American and Western society through contrasting its values and norms with those of other societies. Boasian anthropology in this way tended to consider political activism, through scientific education about society, a significant part of the scientific project.
The program of research and public education activities pursued by Boas, his former students, and their associates—eventually including most of the field of anthropology as practiced in the United States—encompassed a number of discrete areas of inquiry and activity. These include many anthropological specializations and neighboring inter-disciplines, such as those known today as museum anthropology, folkloristics, linguistic anthropology, Native American studies, and ethnohistory.
New York Intellectuals ex Wiki
The New York Intellectuals were a group of American
writers and literary critics based in New
York City in the mid-20th century. Mostly Jews, they
advocated left-wing
politics but were also firmly anti-Stalinist.
The group is known for having sought to integrate literary
theory with Marxism and
socialism while
rejecting
Soviet
socialism as a workable or acceptable political model.
Trotskyism emerged as the most common standpoint among these anti-Stalinist Marxists. Irving Kristol, Irving Howe, Seymour Martin Lipset, Leslie Fiedler and Nathan Glazer were members of the Trotskyist Young People's Socialist League.
Overview
Writers often identified as members of this group include
Hannah Arendt,
William Barrett,
Daniel Bell,[2][3][4]
Saul
Bellow (despite his usual association with the city of Chicago),
Elliot Cohen,,
Midge Decter,
Leslie Fiedler,
Nathan Glazer,[citation
needed]
Clement Greenberg,[5]
Paul Goodman,[6]
Richard Hofstadter,
Sidney Hook,[7][8]
Irving Howe,
Alfred Kazin,
Irving Kristol,
Seymour Martin Lipset,
Mary McCarthy,[9][8]
Dwight Macdonald,[5]
William Phillips,
Norman Podhoretz,[citation
needed]
Philip Rahv,
Harold Rosenberg,
Isaac Rosenfeld,
Delmore Schwartz,[6]
Susan Sontag,
Harvey Swados,
Diana Trilling,
Lionel Trilling, and
Robert Warshow.[citation
needed]
Many of these intellectuals were educated at City College of New York ("Harvard of the Proletariat"),[10] New York University, and Columbia University in the 1930s,[citation needed] and associated in the next two decades with the left-wing political journals Partisan Review and Dissent, as well as the then-left-wing but later neoconservative-leaning journal Commentary. Writer Nicholas Lemann has described these intellectuals as "the American Bloomsbury".
Some, including Kristol, Hook, and Podhoretz, later became key figures in the development of Neoconservatism.
Trotskyism ex Wiki
Trotskyism is the theory of
Marxism
as advocated by
Leon Trotsky. Trotsky identified himself as an
orthodox Marxist and
Bolshevik-Leninist,
and supported founding a
vanguard party of the
proletariat,
proletarian internationalism, and a
dictatorship of the proletariat based on working class self-emancipation
and mass democracy. Trotskyists are critical of
Stalinism, as they oppose the idea of
Socialism in One Country. Trotskyists also criticize the bureaucracy
that developed in the
USSR under
Stalin.
Vladimir Lenin and Trotsky were close both ideologically and personally during the Russian Revolution and its aftermath, and some call Trotsky its "co-leader".[1] However, Lenin criticized Trotsky's ideas and intra-Party political habits. Trotsky was the paramount leader of the Soviet Red Army in the direct aftermath of the Revolutionary period.
Trotsky originally opposed some aspects of Leninism. Later, he concluded that unity between the Mensheviks and Bolsheviks was impossible, and joined the Bolsheviks. Trotsky played a leading role with Lenin in the revolution. Assessing Trotsky, Lenin wrote, "Trotsky long ago said that unification is impossible. Trotsky understood this and from that time on there has been no better Bolshevik."[2]
Trotsky's Fourth International was established in France in 1938 when Trotskyists argued that the Comintern or Third International had become irretrievably "lost to Stalinism" and thus incapable of leading the international working class to political power.[3] In contemporary English language usage, an advocate of Trotsky's ideas is often called a "Trotskyist"; a Trotskyist can be called a "Trotskyite" or "Trot", especially by a critic of Trotskyism.[4]