Stephen Jay Gould - Next to Judas Iscariot, Brutus, and Cassius in the Devil’s Mouth at the
Centre of Hell
or
Boas Was A Determined Liar
QUOTE
In a reissue of The Mismeasure of Man in 1996 Stephen Jay Gould
wrote, “May I end up next to Judas Iscariot, Brutus, and Cassius in the devil’s
mouth at the centre of hell if I ever fail to present my most honest assessment
and best judgment of the evidence for empirical truth” (p. 39). So we definitely
know where to find him...........
Finally, it’s noteworthy that the other major intellectual villain of Chapter 2 of Culture of Critique has also been exposed as producing false data. Franz Boas’s famous study purporting to show that skull shape changed as a result of immigration from Europe to America was a very effective propaganda weapon in the cause of the anti-racialists. Indeed, it was intended as propaganda. Based on their reanalysis of Boas’s data, physical anthropologists Corey Sparks and Richard Jantz do not accuse Boas of scientific fraud, but they do find (pdf) that his data do not show any significant environmental effects on cranial form as a result of immigration. They also claim that Boas may well have been motivated by a desire to end racialist views in anthropology:
And yet, the intellectual left will continue to sleep comfortably, realizing that the record of scientific malfeasance (also apparent in the work of the Frankfurt School and psychoanalysis) will not threaten their Hegemony in the academic world and the media. What we will not see are articles and op-eds in prestigious media highlighting research on race differences in brain size and the links between brain size and IQ.
It should come as no surprise that science has become politics—the theme,
after all, of Culture of Critique. The intellectual, media and
political elites are completely corrupt, their position maintained by power and
propaganda, the high points rigorously policed to prevent non-orthodoxy. We live
in a dark age.
UNQUOTE
Is Doctor
MacDonald telling the truth? It is my
considered opinion that he is spot on, telling it like it is. See more on skulls
at
Ben Stein’s Expelled Was Darwinism a Necessary Condition for the Holocaust And
Was Boas an Honest Scientist
Ben Stein’s Expelled Was Darwinism a Necessary Condition for the Holocaust And Was Boas an Honest Scientist – The Occidental Observer
Doctor MacDonald explains Boaz's allegations regarding Jews's skull changing
dues to immigration. He feels that there were no changes; no evidence just
propaganda.
Franz Boas ex Wiki
QUOTE
Franz Boas (July 9, 1858 – December 21, 1942)
was a German-American
anthropologist a pioneer of modern
anthropology who has
been called the "Father of American Anthropology"
and "the Father of Modern Anthropology."
Like many such pioneers, he trained in other disciplines; he received his
doctorate in physics, and did
post-doctoral work in geography.
He applied the
scientific method to the study of human cultures and societies; previously
this discipline was based on the formulation of grand theories around anecdotal
knowledge.
Boas once summed up his approach to anthropology and folklore by saying: "In the course of time I became convinced that a materialistic point of view, for a physicist a very real one, was untenable. This gave me a new point of view and I recognized the importance of studying the interaction between the organic and inorganic, above all the relation between the life of a people and their physical environment"
But Boas worked more closely with Bastian, who was noted for his antipathy to environmental determinism. Instead, he argued for the "psychic unity of mankind;" a belief that all humans had the same intellectual capacity, and that all cultures were based on the same basic mental principles. Variations in custom and belief, he argued, were the products of historical accidents. This view resonated with Boas's experiences on Baffin Island, and drew him towards anthropology............
Boas proceeds to discuss the arguments for the inferiority of the Negro race, and calls attention to the fact that they were brought to the Americas through force. For Boas, this is just one example of the many times conquest or colonialism has brought different peoples into an unequal relation, and he mentions "the conquest of England by the Normans, the Teutonic invasion of Italy, [and] the Manchoo conquest of China" as resulting in similar conditions. But the best example, for Boas, of this phenomenon is that of the Jews in Europe:
-
Even now there lingers in the consciousness of the old, sharper divisions which the ages had not been able to efface, and which is strong enough to find -- not only here and there -- expression as antipathy to the Jewish type. In France, that let down the barriers more than a hundred years ago, the feeling of antipathy is still strong enough to sustain an anti-Jewish political party.
Boas's closing advice is that Negroes should not look to Whites for approval or encouragement, because people in power usually take a very long time to learn to sympathize with people out of power. "Remember that in every single case in history the process of adaptation has been one of exceeding slowness. Do not look for the impossible, but do not let your path deviate from the quiet and steadfast insistence on full opportunities for your powers."
Despite Boas's caveat about the intractability of White
prejudice, he also considered it the scientist's responsibility to argue
against White myths of racial purity and racial superiority, and to use the
evidence of his research to fight
Racism.
UNQUOTE
Boas helped invent the concept of
Racism and the idea that it is evil but only when it is
white men alleged to be guilty. Jews are, of course grossly
Racist, claiming
that goyim, that is non-Jews are animals in human form.
Kevin MacDonald Explains Boas
QUOTE
DR KEVIN MACDONALD, AUTHOR, PSYCHOLOGIST AND HISTORIAN,
is a Professor of Psychology at the California State University in Long Beach
California.
Kevin MacDonald is a co-founder and participating journalist of the Occidental Observer and The Occidental Quarterly, both dedicated to the preservation of the Euro-American white race, of which, international Jewry is attempting to destroy.
As the author of several books, Kevin MacDonald outlines Jewry’s quest to destroy White Christian culture through intellectual movements, politics, and the mass media. His masterwork, The Culture Of Critique, can be ordered Here. (Read The Review, Here.)
Kevin MacDonald also is the publisher of two of his own Websites: Kevin MacDonald Archives and the Kevin MacDonald Blog.
Brother Nathanael Kapner: The Anti Defamation League (ADL) recently attacked you as “an anti-Semitic professor” who couches his views as “legitimate intellectual inquiry.”
They state that you argue that “Jews are a hostile elite in American society who undermine the country’s European heritage and traditions in an effort to destroy Europeans.” How do you respond to this?
Kevin MacDonald, PhD: My lode is as follows: I see conflicts of interest between ethnic groups as part of the natural world.
The only difference between conflicts between Jews and non-Jews compared to garden variety ethnic conflict stems from the fact that for over a century, Jews have formed an elite in various European and European-derived societies with a peculiar profile: deeply ethnocentric; adept at ethnic networking; wealthy and intelligent; aggressive in pursuit of their interests; prone to media ownership and the production of culture; and hostile to the traditional peoples and cultures of the societies in which they form an elite.
Br Nathanael: The ADL contends that your research provides “intellectual legitimacy to anti-Semitism.” What is your response?
Kevin MacDonald: Because Jews have wielded immense power as an elite that is vastly disproportionate to their numbers, anti-Jewish attitudes and behaviour are to be expected when Jewish power conflicts with the interests of others.
To
be more specific, the various themes of modern
anti-Semitism all boil down to
the Jewish role as a hostile elite whose attitudes and behaviour are both
self-serving and detrimental to the interests of the indigenous peoples with
whom they reside.
This is evidenced by Jewry’s economic domination in many parts of Europe prior to World War II; cultural subversion via the Jewish role in the media and intellectual life (e.g. removing Christian symbols from public places); facilitating the displacement of native populations via mass migration into Western societies; dual loyalty because of Jewish sympathies with foreign Jews, especially Israel since 1948; and the history of Jews as a hostile elite in the USSR during the period when it became the most murderous regime in European history.
Since I believe that these propositions are intellectually defensible, and since these propositions, if believed by non-Jews, would cause them to attempt to lessen Jewish power and thereby further their own interests, it is indeed the case that my work could be said to provide intellectual legitimacy to anti-Jewish attitudes and behaviour.
But this isn’t really any different from claiming that Zionist theories provide intellectual legitimacy to the dispossession of the Palestinians - or that Freudian psychoanalysis provides intellectual legitimacy to anti-Western attitudes. At the end of the day, what counts is whether indeed my writings are intellectually defensible.
WHITE IDENTITY DENIED
Br Nathanael: The Jewish front group, the Southern Poverty Law Centre (SPLC), which is heavily Jewish-funded, (including funding from George Soros’ Open Society), joined with the ADL in attacking you. Calling you America’s “scariest academic,” did they not try to get you fired from California State University in the spring of 2008?
Kevin MacDonald: The SPLC did want me fired, but there was no way the university could do that because I have tenure. They just made my life miserable and rallied the other faculty against me through countless meetings and statements. The LA Jewish Journal jumped on the ’stir’ in their cover story, “The Professor Anti Semites Love,” which highlighted the SPLC’s accusations against me. It has calmed down a bit, though there are still some faculty members who do everything they can to make life unpleasant for me.
Br Nathanael: It appears from your most recent writings, such as your essay exposing Jewry’s activities against white Americans, “The Utter Normality Of Ethnonationalism—Except For Whites,” that you have moved from being a dispassionate observer to an overt critic of Jewish collective behaviour. Why the change?
Kevin MacDonald: As I noted, segments of the Jewish community have interests and behaviour that conflict with my interests, of which, I am active in promoting.
For
example, I firmly believe that Jewish neo-conservatives whose primary allegiance
is to Israel have had a decisive influence on recent American foreign policy.
Currently, even though Obama has pressed Israel to put a freeze on settlement
expansion, the Jewish lobby has won out as agents for the Israeli government’s
expansion in the occupied areas. Thus, I am actively engaged in an attempt to
alter the intellectual and political climate in this country so that these sorts
of things do not continue.
Being able to discuss the Jewish motivation as the main mover of our current foreign policy is, in my opinion, an important aspect of being able to change this policy to conform to what I think are in the interests of the great majority of Americans, including myself.
What I am doing is no different from the legions of Jewish academics who, as an aspect of their professional and personal identity, have vigorously pursued their ethnic interests by writing for mainstream publications, by promoting Zionist causes, and by attempting to change the intellectual and political climate of the U.S. in a way that furthers their perceived ethnic interests.
Their presence at elite universities and their access to prestigious publication venues, is an important basis of their influence. I am simply expressing, and with as much vigour, my own interests and those of numerous others.
AMERICAN JEWRY CREATES ‘WHITE GUILT’
Br Nathanael: In one of your essays from your book, Cultural Insurrections, Psychology And White Ethnocentrism, you alternate between the phrases, “implicit whiteness” and “white guilt.” Is there a connection between the two?
Kevin MacDonald: We must go back to what I mentioned earlier of how Jews in academia and in the media are prone to construction of culture. Herein lies the fundamental issues surrounding white ethnocentrism, and specifically, “implicit whiteness” and “white guilt.”
In a broader context, it has been the Jewish intellectual movements of the 20th Century that have effected a significant decline in the cultural influence of white Americans. These Jewish movements have infused into American life a culture of critique which assaults Western culture as being something deficient, something suspect, something replete with moral turpitude.
A prime component of the Jewish movements’ attack on white identity has been the pathologization of Gentile allegiances. In the Jewish-created culture of critique which now exists in America, these Gentile allegiances are looked upon as “racist,” and for all practical purposes, that is, Jewish purposes, “taboo.”
The leaders of these movements, such as Franz Boas in the field of anthropology and Sigmund Freud in the field of psychoanalysis, who identified themselves as Jews, have subjected white Christian culture to radical criticism while at the same time have Judaized that culture to the detriment, indeed, even to the fear, of white identification.
Br Nathanael: How then does “implicit whiteness” and “white guilt” come into play?
Kevin MacDonald: Despite the current cultural programming, white people are coalescing into what I term “implicit white communities” in multicultural America — communities that reflect their ethnocentrism but that “cannot tell their name.”
Why can’t they “tell their name?” They cannot
explicitly state that their choice of neighbourhoods
derives from racial
preference because that conflicts with the official racial ideology of the wider
culture. Hence, the psychological response of “guilt,” specifically, “white
guilt,” comes into play.
“Political orrectness,” which now determines behavioural innocence or guilt, has been infixed into America’s collective consciousness by the powerful Jewish forces in the academic and media worlds. The discussion of issues related to white identity and interests has been shaped, controlled, and submerged by these two Jewish-dominated centres of power.
Br Nathanael: Do you have a solution to this dilemma facing white Americans?
Kevin MacDonald: White Americans have a daunting challenge before them. White Flight, as part of the fragmented future that lies in store for our nation with high levels of non-European immigration, is insufficient for dealing with Jewry’s assault on our racial identity and allegiances. In attempting to find a way out of this morass, changing the explicit culture is critical.
Only courage and working together as “whites” for our specific interests and goals, which will naturally conflict with Jewish interests and goals, can make this a reality.
Kevin MacDonald ex Wiki
QUOTE
Kevin B. MacDonald (born January 24, 1944) is a professor of
psychology at
California State University, Long Beach, best known for his use of
evolutionary
psychology to inform his study of
Judaism as being a "group
evolutionary strategy."
MacDonald's most controversial claim is that a suite of traits that he attributes to Jews, including higher-than-average verbal intelligence and ethnocentricism, have eugenically evolved to enhance the ability of Jews to conspire to out-compete non-Jews for resources while undermining the power and self-confidence of the white majorities in Europe and America whom he insists Jews seek to dispossess.
His colleagues at the university's psychology department, as well as the Cal State Long Beach academic senate, have formally disassociated themselves from his work. The academic senate described his views as anti-Semitic and white ethnocentric.
Race,
culture, and intelligence
Like some of his fellow contributors to
VDARE, MacDonald questions
claims that racial differences are unimportant or illusory and that racial and
cultural assimilation will be an easy process.[citation
needed] He believes that blacks and Latinos are by and large
genetically intellectually inferior to whites and Asians and disagrees with the
contentions of popular scientists such as
Stephen Jay Gould [
Jew ],
Richard Lewontin [
Jew ],
Leon Kamin [
Jew, son of a rabbi from Poland ],
Steven Rose [ Jew ], and
Jared Diamond [ Jew ].
UNQUOTE
The fact that Jews hate him suggests that he is right. The Wiki
claims that he is controversial, another point in his favour. There is use of
words like claim and allege.
Words
are Propaganda Tools