Judicial-Inc.biz tells us  who is coming from where in Control of internet information - it got a superb endorsement from the Wikipedia until the 9 March 2006. On 13 March it was reversed.

Sadly I have had to revise my view of Judicial. He has an indifference to the facts which mean that he cannot be relied on for any serious thesis but he is a source of ideas. See under:-

Judicial-Inc.biz
Is run by The Skunk who is critical of Jews and Zionists and so well informed that the Wikipedia is worried about him.
QUOTE
He also runs and writes Judicial-Inc.biz which is one of the most influential anti-judaistic sites on the internet, and one of the most reliable. His comments are so shockingly accurate that one wonders if he is a Zionist Jewish insider with a grudge or agenda?!
UNQUOTE on 9 March 2006

That kind of endorsement from his enemies [ see  The Wikipedia  ] is highly convincing. I thought he was  good anyway.
PS, that is what it said on 9 March 2006. On the 13 March 2006 it had been reversed.

QUOTE
He also runs and writes Judicial-Inc.biz which is one of the most influential, yet unreliable, anti- Semitic sites on the internet, and one of the most outrageously dishonest, concerning evidence and facts. He proffers photos and evidence, which have been outed as false or doctored.
UNQUOTE on  13 March
Their perversion of his entry helps prove their dishonesty.

 

Metapedia
If you get the feeling that the Wiki has a political and cultural agenda, you are right and on the road to understanding things. It makes sense to try the Metapedia which also has an agenda but wears its heart on its sleeve.

 

Teachers, Feel my Truthiness - Jimbo Wales Christmas Message
QUOTE
Yes, it's that time of year when children eagerly gather round a kindly old man with a beard. He makes great promises to them, if only they just work hard enough. But they just get a load of obscenities back. Only it's not Santa. Wikipedia's Maximum Leader and peripatetic salesman Jimmy Wales breezed into London yesterday. This time he's pitching Jimbo's Big Bag of Trivia at teachers and lecturers. Wikipedia should be permitted as a source in citations he now says, reversing his earlier position that students who cite Wikipedia as an authoritative source "deserved to get an F grade". Wales' logic is that the students are going to use it anyway, so why not permit them to cite it as a source?

He also claims the site has become more reliable. Under Wales' advice, it's effectively become locked-down, shedding its "democratic" aspirations in all but name. Today, all edits on a topic are sent to a single 14-year old in Kalamazoo, Michigan, whose judgment is final. "There is no substitute for peer critique," he told a conference. What - not even people who know what they're talking about?
UNQUOTE
The Register has its finger on the pulse. They see no reason to believe him.

 

Useful Resource Site For Wiki Inaccuracies
This is better than Judicial but makes the same basic point. One way to judging the Wiki is look up something you know about. Who ever [ one or more ] did the article on pulse code modulation is on the right lines and knows a lot more about it than I do.

 

Fix Wikipedia Make the People’s Encyclopaedia a Science-Based Resource
Daniel Loxton, Editor of Junior Skeptic (and the organizer behind What Do I Do Next? 105 Practical Ways to Promote Skepticism and Advance Science) addresses the importance of Wikipedia. Find out how grassroots skeptics can help ensure that Wikipedia is a science-based public resource.

 

A pro-Israel group's plan to rewrite history on Wikipedia (also here).
The perpetrators are an outfit called CAMERA. I would have thought the Wiki was sufficiently on message. They do not.

 

B'Tselem - The Israeli Information Centre for Human Rights in the Occupied Territories
B'Tselem is a human rights operation and their definition of human includes Palestinians. They tell us about Zionist atrocities and use the truth as a weapon. The Wikipedia manages to sound very unenthusiastic about them. This article was written to seem fair and yet cast the maximum of doubt. Words like claim and assert are indicative - Words as Propaganda Tools There is no mention of being a Zionist propaganda operation.

 

The Conservapedia
Has been set up precisely because the people running the Wiki will not take it down the middle. Go to their main page for more and better details or go to Examples of Bias in Wikipedia.

 

Flemming Rose, Zionist, Agent Provocateur and Wikipedia [ see Cartoons  ]
The Wikipedia told us that Rose was a Jew from the Ukraine who collaborates  with Daniel Pipes, a very noisy Zionist front man. A day later the entry  had been censored. The text also turned up at  www.haloscan.com/,  bazar.baraban.com,  [LesOGRES.Org] Réagir and Europe's journalists speak out on Danish cartoons

 

Jack The Ripper Was A Jew
The Wikipedia which is a propaganda operation gives an in depth article on Jack but treads lightly on the facts that there were a large number of Jews in the area and that four Jews were more or less plausible suspects. For that gem you have to go to a separate article called Jack the Ripper suspects. This is not definitive proof of bias but when these things keep happening it seems more likely.

 

Katsav the Rapist
Is the President of Israel and about to be charged with rape and fraud. The Wiki tells us but wants us to believe that he has been fitted up. See President of Israel to be charged with rape and fraud for more and better details.
PS The version dated "This page was last modified 09:33, 25 January 2007" tells us that Katsav got mouthy with journalists. The version down loaded a few hours later is dated "This page was last modified 14:10, 23 January 2007" leaves out the bit about him abusing the reporters but includes the claim that he was charged on 23 January. The Wikipedia's editors are in a position to cheat. They do.
PS Katsav got six years. He was put in the same cell as the Minister of Health.

 

Metapedia Versus Wikipedia
Two operations mean two versions of the truth. I like the Metapedia. Others definitely do not.

 

Wiki's biased editing exposed by computer program
Surprising? Not to me at all events. A bright lad has used IP addresses to trace who is changing entries and it is corporate public relations departments all too often. It is not just commercial operations massaging the truth. Government outfits are at it too.
QUOTE
The credibility of the online encyclopaedia Wikipedia has taken another dive after a newly developed software program exposed how the CIA, corporations like Diebold and others routinely edit entries to bury criticism and manipulate the truth.

The Wikipedia Scanner (http://wikiscanner.virgil.gr/) also allows users to type in an IP range and find out which organizations are editing what pages on Wikipedia.

"The result: A database of 5.3 million edits, performed by 2.6 million organizations or individuals ranging from the CIA to Microsoft to Congressional offices, now linked to the edits they or someone at their organization's net address has made. Some of this appears to be transparently self-interested, either adding positive, press release-like material to entries, or deleting whole swaths [ sic ] of critical material," concludes the Wired report.
UNQUOTE
This is straightforward abuse by powerful interests. There is no mention of the owner's agenda.

 

Wikipedia Hivemind
Was kicking up all sorts of dust about the place... painted.. as burnt-out editors, Wikipedia Head cases if you will, as much a part of the Wikipedia as anything else. That is.. mere insider posturing.

 

The Wikipedia and Propaganda
The gloves come off when the issue matters. This is Zionist propaganda about the Bolshevik Revolution.

 

Wikipedia On Race - Blacks Get A Pass
QUOTE
With almost 2.4 million on-line entries, and more than 1 million volunteer editors, the English-language version of Wikipedia.com is the world’s biggest encyclopaedia, and according to the rating service Alexa it is the world’s ninth-most frequently visited Internet site. “The free encyclopaedia that anyone can edit” promises to deliver “the sum of all human knowledge.”...........

However, when it comes to controversial questions—race in particular—the everyone-is-an-editor model breaks down. Wikipedia suffers from the same liberal biases [ Englishmen should read that as left wing  biases - Editor ] as any mainstream publisher, but exercises them even more ruthlessly. This is because many contributors offer factual but subversive information—which forces many Wikipedia administrators to spend their time actively rooting it out...........

Wikipedia’s treatment of pro-white or race-realist groups is transparent propaganda. The article on white nationalism reminds readers that the very concept of race is “an anthropological archaism,” and suggests only two possible positions on race: multiculturalism or neo-Nazism. It writes admiringly of anti-white groups as “anti-racist organizations,” while treating anyone sympathetic to whites with hostility and scepticism. Any concern for the survival of whites is nothing more than “the repackaging, relabelling, and transformation of white supremacy into something that would appeal to a broader, more educated audience.” Conclusion: “The American Renaissance, Council of Conservative Citizens, the National Alliance and National Vanguard are .. widely recognized as white supremacist and racist groups.”......

It would be easy to cite more examples, but the point is clear: Wikipedia actively purveys and reinforces the prejudices of our time. I see it as a cross between an Internet message board and today’s authoritarian, multi-cultural university. Or, as co-founder Larry Sanger, himself a liberal, wrote in June 2006, “Wikipedia has gone from a nearly perfect anarchy to an anarchy with gang rule.”
UNQUOTE
A rather long article with solid positions on facts and the Wiki's attitude. It is another propaganda machine.

 

The Wikipedia and Teddy Kennedy
QUOTE
Ted Kennedy Chappaquiddick incident
The Chappaquiddick incident refers to the circumstances surrounding the 1969 death of Mary Jo Kopechne, a campaign worker for Senator Kennedy. Kopechne was killed when the Senator drove his mother's vehicle off of a bridge and into a channel after a party at Chappaquiddick Island, Martha's Vineyard.
UNQUOTE
The Wikipedia article on Kennedy treads very lightly on the Chappaquiddick Massacre and makes no mention at all of the Florida Rape. The specific article on Chappaquiddick makes no mention of his lack of a driving licence far less his intentions towards his victim.

 

Why is Wikipedia Censoring Me?
James Bacque is an author of historical books dealing with the Second World War and is not pleased by the Wikipedia's very one sided comments on one of his books. He published corrections. They wiped his work out and made the comments even more dishonest. Their objection was that he was telling truth rather than  the Jewish version.

 

Wikipedia Watch
Someone else casts a jaundiced eye over the Wikipedia. It is fair to say that the owner thereof, Jimmy Wales, the pornographer has the good sense to keep the best for himself.

 

Wikipedia founder sidelines amateur editors
It was founded by two Jews(?). There was a parting of ways and now a rival operation.

 

White Nationalist Wikipedia on Wikipedia
The Wikipedia has its bias and its agenda - concealed but there none the less. The WN Wiki puts fact and opinion into the public domain. Read for yourself. Think for yourself. Decide for yourself.
PS It is no longer with us. RIP or arise triumphant.

 

Wikipedia Review
Some one else has a view about their honesty.

 

Wikipedia and Vandalism
They are open to a lot of people who want to write things so they have to have a degree of oversight. They claim that articles should be written down the middle without a point of  view obtruding. It does not work like that of course.

 

Wikipedia and the intelligence services
QUOTE
..... As I could not locate the article in which I had learned about the allegations, I consulted the article on the Entebbe Operation on Wikipedia, where I knew the story had been noted. To my surprise, I found that all references to the alleged collaboration between the PFLP and the Shin Bet had been suppressed. Moreover, it is no longer possible to edit the page.....

In the aftermath of the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, the Pentagon set up the Defence Department's Office of Strategic Influence with a mission "to provide news items and false information directly to foreign journalists and others to bolster U.S. policy and the war on terrorism."
UNQUOTE
The Wiki is very useful to people so it gets used by propaganda outfits.

 

Wikipedia - What it Doesn't Say 
Somebody else found out the hard way that Wikipedia tells us what it wants, not what we want.

 

Wikipedia Advertisement
QUOTE
He's a one-time futures trader and the force behind one of the internet's most successful sites - and unlike many of his peers he hasn't sold out to big business for billions. It's all done in the name of free knowledge for all, he says.

Non-profit Wikipedia - the online encyclopaedia that anyone can access and edit - is the work of Jimmy Wales, a man who states on his personal website that his goal is "free knowledge for free minds".
UNQUOTE
This article minimizes Wales' pornography and says nothing at all about his agenda.

 

Wikitruth
QUOTE
 

The truth needs to be revealed. The atrocities have gone on long enough.

Welcome toWikitruth,

the free scandal sheet that anyone can visit.

• censorship
• vandalism
• abuse

• nudity
• corruption
• predators

• doublespeak
• quotes
• press

UNQUOTE
Sex, lust, violence, corruption, the inside story; what more could you want?

 

Larry Sanger ex Wiki
Lawrence Mark Sanger (/ˈsæŋər/;^[1] born July 16, 1968) is an American Internet project developer and philosopher who co-founded the online encyclopedia Wikipedia along with Jimmy Wales, for which Sanger coined the name and wrote much of its original governing policy. Sanger has worked on other online projects, including Nupedia, Encyclopedia of Earth, Citizendium, WatchKnowLearn, Reading Bear, Infobitt and Everipedia. He has also advised blockchain company Phunware and the nonprofit online American political encyclopedia Ballotpedia.^[2]

While studying at college, Sanger developed an interest in using the Internet for educational purposes and joined the online encyclopedia Nupedia as editor-in-chief in 2000. Disappointed with the slow progress of Nupedia, Sanger proposed using a wiki to solicit and receive articles to put through Nupedia's peer-review process; this change led to the development and launch of Wikipedia in 2001. Sanger served as Wikipedia's community leader in Wikipedia's early stages but became increasingly disillusioned with the project and left it in 2002. Sanger's status as a co-founder of Wikipedia has been questioned by fellow co-founder Jimmy Wales but is generally accepted.

Since Sanger's departure from Wikipedia, he has been critical of the project, describing it in 2007 as being "broken beyond repair".^[3] He has argued that despite its merits, Wikipedia lacks credibility due to a lack of respect for expertise and authority. He has also criticized Wikipedia for what he perceives as a leftist and liberal ideological bias in its articles. He founded Citizendium in 2006 to compete with Wikipedia, stepped down as editor-in-chief of the project in 2010, and left Citizendium entirely in 2020. In 2017, he joined Everipedia as chief information officer (CTO), but resigned from this position in 2019 to establish the Knowledge Standards Foundation and the encyclosphere. Sanger currently serves as the President and Executive Director of the Knowledge Standards Foundation.^[2][4][5]

Sanger's other interests include a focus on philosophy—in particular epistemology, early modern philosophy, and ethics. He taught philosophy at his alma mater Ohio State University.

 

 

White Genocide Conspiracy Theory ex Wiki
QUOTE
The white genocide, white extinction,^[1] or white replacement conspiracy theory,^[2][3][4] is a white supremacist^[5][6][7][8] conspiracy theory which states that there is a deliberate plot, often blamed on Jews,^[5][8] to promote miscegenation,^[9] interracial marriage, mass non-white immigration, racial integration, low fertility rates, abortion, governmental land-confiscation from whites, organised violence,^[10] and eliminationism in white-founded countries^[5] in order to cause the extinction of whites through forced assimilation,^[10] mass immigration, and violent genocide.^{[11][12][13][14]} Less frequently, black people,^[15] Hispanics,^[16] and Muslims^[17] are blamed for the secret plot, but merely as more fertile immigrants,^[18] invaders,^[19] or violent aggressors,^[20] rather than the masterminds.^[21]

White genocide is a political myth,^[22][23][15] based on pseudoscience, pseudohistory, and ethnic hatred,^[24] driven by a psychological panic often termed "white extinction anxiety".^[25][16] White people are not dying out or facing extermination.^{[26][27][28][21]} The purpose of the conspiracy theory is to justify a commitment to a white nationalist agenda^[29] in support of calls to violence.^[22][20][19]

The theory was popularized by white separatist neo-Nazi David Lane around 1995, and has been leveraged as propaganda in Europe, North America, South Africa, and Australia. Similar conspiracy theories were prevalent in Nazi Germany^[30] and have been used in the present-day interchangeably with,^[31] and as a broader and more extreme version of, Renaud Camus's 2011 The Great Replacement, focusing on the white population of France.^[32][33] Since the 2019 Christchurch and El Paso shootings, of which the shooters' manifestos decried a "white replacement" and have referenced the concept of "Great Replacement", Camus's conspiracy theory (often called "replacement theory" or "population replacement"),^[34] along with Bat Ye'or's 2002 Eurabia concept^[35] and Gerd Honsik's resurgent 1970s myth of a Kalergi plan,^[31] have all been used synonymously with "white genocide" and are increasingly referred to as variations of the conspiracy theory.

In August 2018, US President Donald Trump was accused of endorsing the conspiracy theory in a foreign policy tweet instructing Secretary of State Mike Pompeo to investigate South African "land and farm seizures and expropriations and the large scale killing of farmers",^[36][37][38] claiming that the "South African government is now seizing land from white farmers".^[39] The often critical narrative derived from the South African farm attacks, and land reform in South Africa, is an established subset theme of the broader conspiracy theory,^[26] portrayed in media as a form of gateway or proxy issue to "white genocide" within the wider context of the Western world.^[40][39] The topic of farm seizures in South Africa and Zimbabwe has been a rallying cry of white nationalists and alt-right groups^[41][42] who use it to justify their vision of white supremacy.^[43][39]
UNQUOTE
The headline is verbatim and fraudulent. The Wikipedia's allegation that this is a mere Conspiracy Theory is just plain wrong. There are multiple lies here. Zionist crazies are the perpetrators. Blacks are tools, the foot soldiers being used to fill Trojan Horses throughout Western Civilization.

 

Wikipedia to tighten editorial process  [ 20 December 2005 ]
It always was tight but secret. The public sales pitch and the public perception was that it open to anyone to write and to be criticized. The reality is not the same. Editing has a political agenda just like the rest of the media.

 

The truths and lies of WikiWorld [ 12 October 2007 ]
QUOTE
The free online encyclopaedia Wikipedia is a democratically decided database that has been open to abuse, but the advent of WikiScanner has uncovered a web of deceit and disinformation...........
UNQUOTE
Anyone can edit. Anyone does; especially anyone with a special interest. First class article but it does not pick up on the fact that the de facto owner of the Wiki has his very own agenda and the power to get away with it.

 

Wikipedia Perverts Truth About Obama [ 13 March 2009 ]
QUOTE
Wikipedia, the online "free encyclopaedia" mega-site written and edited entirely by its users, has been deleting within minutes any mention of eligibility issues surrounding Barack Obama's presidency, with administrators kicking off anyone who writes about the subject, WND has learned. A perusal through Obama's current Wikipedia entry finds a heavily guarded, mostly glowing biography about the U.S. president. Some of Obama's most controversial past affiliations, including with Rev. Jeremiah Wright and former Weathermen terrorist Bill Ayers, are not once mentioned, even though those associations received much news media attention and served as dominant themes during the presidential elections last year.

Also completely lacking is any mention of the well-publicized concerns surrounding Obama's eligibility to serve as commander-in-chief.

Where's the proof Barack Obama was born in the U.S. or that he fulfills the "natural-born American" clause in the Constitution? If you still want to see it, join more than 300,000 others and sign up now! 
UNQUOTE
The Wikipedia is a lie machine and part of the main stream media. It is controlled by someone with an agenda.

 

Wikipedia Man Murdered His Mother [ 28 April 2009 ]
QUOTE
Wikipedia's Norwegian press officer - one of the "bureaucrats" who oversaw Norway's incarnation of the "free encyclopaedia anyone can edit" - has been arrested for killing his mother. Last week, as reported by Dagbladet, one of Norway's largest newspapers, a 36-year-old man phoned the police in the small town of Son in Vestby and told them he had killed his mother, who was in her fifties. The man - whose named was withheld by the paper, according to local law - was a school teacher and one of eight bureaucrats charged with running Wikipedia Norge. According to his Wikipedia bio - which was since been purged from the site - he was the project's press spokesperson and once worked on the English arm of the free encyclopaedia/alternate universe.
UNQUOTE
This does not prove that the Wikipedia is deeply evil.

 

Wikipedia Tells The Lie Direct About Jews Running Bolshevism [ 1 November 2011 is All Saints Day ]
QUOTE
Jewish Bolshevism, Judeo-Bolshevism, and known as Żydokomuna in Poland, is an antisemitic stereotype based on the claim that Jews have been the driving force behind or are disproportionately involved in the modern Communist movement, or sometimes more specifically Russian Bolshevism........... The allegation still sees use in antisemitic publications and websites today.
UNQUOTE
The Wikipedia is reasonably reliable until the agenda cuts in. Knowing where it is untrustworthy makes it more useful. Merely suppressing the truth is easier to get away with. Gross lies like this one are unusual for that reason.

One honest source is Robert Wilton, an Englishman who was in Russia during the  October Revolution. He wrote The Last Days of the Romanovs and named the Jews running Russia. The Wikipedia pretends he does not exist. Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn was a famous Russian dissident until he wrote 200 Years Together which named the perpetrators, the Jews who murdered, robbed, raped, tortured. Then he became a non-person. See Chapter 21 in particular. More evidence is at Jews After The Revolution and at Communism Was Jewish. This article lies about Frank L Britton who wrote Behind Communism explaining the menace that is the Jew giving sources, giving evidence. That is why the Wiki does not link to his book. Read for yourself. Think for yourself. Decide for yourself.

 

Wiki Claims That Jews Are Victims Not Perpetrators [ 1 November 2011 is All Saints Day ]
QUOTE
Jews had been a persecuted minority in the Russian Empire. They had endured a form of racial segregation in the Pale of Settlement, as well as sporadic pogroms. In the period from 1881 to 1920, more than two million Jews left Russia.
UNQUOTE
One of that two million was Jack The Ripper, Another Jew

 

Zionist Jews Perverting Wikipedia  [ 26 May 2018 ]
QUOTE
The news that an anonymous user by the name of “Philip Cross” has made over 30 edits per day, seven days a week, for 14 years without a single break, all to push pro-Israel propaganda, is firm evidence of the Jewish lobby’s ongoing editing of the “open” Wikipedia website, it has emerged.

As revealed in an exposé published by author, broadcaster, former British Ambassador to Uzbekistan and Rector of the University of Dundee from 2007 to 2010, Craig Murray, the user known as “Philip Cross” has not had one single day off from editing Wikipedia in almost five years.

“Cross” has edited every single day from 29 August 2013 to 14 May 2018. Including five Christmas Days. That’s 1,721 consecutive days of editing, Murray revealed, quoting a review first published on a site critical of Wikipedia called Wikipedia.fivefilters.org.

As Murray goes on to explain, 133,612 edits to Wikipedia have been made in the name of “Philip Cross” over 14 years.
UNQUOTE
The Israel Lobby is a gang of parasites, that has infiltrated Western Civilization to suck our blood and destroy us. This is just another example. Craig Murray is a decent man sacked by the Foreign Office for telling the truth.

 

Wikipedia Co-Founder Says It Has Gone Badly Left  [ 23 February 2021 ]
QUOTE
Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger has slammed the site's leftist bias and claims its days of 'neutrality are long gone' in a new interview. Sanger, 52, called alleged bias on the site he co-founded in January 2001 with Jimmy Wales 'disheartening' in an interview for a Fox News analysis. According to his own Wikipedia page, Sanger has long 'been critical of the project,' and described it as being 'broken beyond repair' in 2007..........

'Wikipedia's ideological and religious bias is real and troubling, particularly in a resource that continues to be treated by many as an unbiased reference work.' Wikipedia pages related to socialism and communism contain show how the website has 'become merely left-wing advocacy essays,' according to Fox News.

'The two main pages for "Socialism" and "Communism" span a massive 28,000 words, and yet they contain no discussion of the genocides committed by socialist and communist regimes, in which tens of millions of people were murdered and starved,' the Fox News analysis claims.

Sanger told the outlet he is now working on a new 'Encyclosphere' project but said he doesn't think Wikipedia could be 'salvaged.' 
UNQUOTE
The trouble with the Wiki is the system of editors without adequate direction. Too many products of a corrupted Education Industry are colluding with each other. You can enlist with Larry's venture by going to https://encyclosphere.org/

 

The Wikipedia Is A Left Wing Propaganda Machine Says Its Co-Founder  [ 8 March 2021 ]
QUOTE
Long understood to be a an unreliable resource by serious academics, journalists, and bloggers, Wikipedia has more recently gained a broader reputation for leftwing bias.

Indeed, one of its co-founders notes that Wikipedia entries on socialism and communism are little more than propaganda and that he is launching a competing free-speech encyclopedia site.

Once considered a somewhat viable place to get a rudimentary handle on a topic, Wikipedia has arguably become a repository of “left-wing advocacy essays.”  This change does not sit well with one of Wikipedia’s co-founders, Larry Sanger............

One of the major areas in which this drift into leftist propaganda is most noticeable is in the site’s treatment of socialism and communism...........

Sanger is having none of it and is launching a competing encyclopedia site that he says will be immune from the leftist bias and propaganda he sees as having taken over Wikipedia. While the left is caught up in their cancel culture, blacklisting, silencing of wrongthink madness, there are people pushing back, people with track records in successful internet ventures.

I don’t think we want an ideologically “segregated” internet in which the left and right are forging their own bubble world paths, but that does seem to be the result of the left attempting to force its narrative on us all by attempting to silence voices that don’t sing the leftist tune of the day.
UNQUOTE
Doctor Sanger is right. You can(?) sign on for the Encyclosphere by clicking on this link https://encyclosphere.org/. It is run by the Knowledge Standards Foundation.

 

Wikipedia Bias Getting Worse Says Its Co-Founder   [ 7 July 2021 ]
QUOTE
Larry Sanger, a co-founder of Wikipedia, warned that the online encyclopedia is “more one-sided than ever” in light of the website’s entries for Black Lives Matter, the 2020 election, former President Donald Trump's two impeachments, and other contentious topics.

Sanger, in particular, took issue with how some Wikipedia entries are sourced.

“In short, and with few exceptions, only globalist, progressive mainstream sources—and sources friendly to globalist progressivism—are permitted,” he wrote in an article on his website..............

Wikipedia has 230,000 volunteer editors who work on crowd sourced articles and more than 3,500 “administrators” who can take actions such as blocking accounts or restricting edits on certain pages, according to a Reuters article............. Sanger noted that Wikipedia has banned Fox News’ political reporting, the New York Post, and the Daily Mail from being used as sources...........

“It is not too far to say that Wikipedia, like many other deeply biased institutions of our brave new digital world, has made itself into a kind of thought police that has de facto shackled conservative viewpoints with which they disagree,” Sanger wrote in a conclusion on his website. “Democracy cannot thrive under such conditions: I maintain that Wikipedia has become an opponent of vigorous democracy.”
UNQUOTE
The Epoch Times' article reads as honest comment on an important matter. Free Speech is at the heart of the First Amendment to the American Bill of Rights for reason. It is under heavy attack by the self-righteous, by the Mainstream Media, the Education Industry, the Lunatic Fringe, by Rent A Mob etc. Larry Sanger is right. Jimmy Wales, the other co-founder does not seem to care. At all events he does not seem to have gone public.