White Privilege is a term explained with great enthusiasm, at great length by the Wikipedia. It is a case where you should read, if at all with care, with suspicion. Doing what Marxists call Deconstruction means questioning the background assumptions, Reading but not with your mind in neutral is the way to go.
The Wiki is marketing White Guilt but then so are Socialists, Marxists & the Enemy Within. The Wikipedia explains it in Loaded language.
The inherent assumption is that we have privileges, unfair advantages, unearned advantages. It is wrong. It is the assumption that we did not create civilization, that it is not ours. Ask what Blacks have done for the world and what they have done to the world. Africa did not invent the wheel - or anything more complicated. The Chinese did a lot better with paper, lacquer, gun powder etc. However their society was oppressive. The Japanese also stalled until the White Man introduced Science.. Now Asia is progressing by its own efforts while Africa is reverting to the Stone Age. Notice what Fred has to say about China Progressing. They are serious rivals.
Notice further that Blacks & other Third World inmates are desperate to get out, to infiltrate Europe. That is honest comment on the ugly reality of Marxism. Note further what Jared Taylor of AmRen tells us, explaining What It Means To Be White. It is to be abused as a perpetrator, a Racist in your own country, the land your ancestors built, using the technology they invented.
The Conservative Woman, a worthy group addresses the same theme as Apartheid in the Church of England With White People As The Victims. It an all too typical example of the Trahison des Clercs.
White Privilege ex Wiki
White privilege (or white skin privilege) is a term for societal privileges that benefit people identified as white in Western countries, beyond what is commonly experienced by non-white people under the same social, political, or economic circumstances. Academic perspectives such as critical race theory and whiteness studies use the concept of "white privilege" to analyze how racism and racialized societies affect the lives of white or white-skinned people.According to Peggy McIntosh, whites in Western societies enjoy advantages that non-whites do not experience, as "an invisible package of unearned assets".[1] [ She lies - Editor ] White privilege denotes both obvious and less obvious passive advantages that white people may not recognize they have, which distinguishes it from overt bias or prejudice. These include cultural affirmations of one's own worth; presumed greater social status; and freedom to move, buy, work, play, and speak freely. The effects can be seen in professional, educational, and personal contexts. The concept of white privilege also implies the right to assume the universality of one's own experiences, marking others as different or exceptional while perceiving oneself as normal.[2][3]
The concept has attracted attention and some opposition. Some critics say that the term uses the concept of "whiteness" as a proxy for class or other social privilege or as a distraction from deeper underlying problems of inequality.[4][5] Others state that it is not that whiteness is a proxy but that many other social privileges are interconnected with it, requiring complex and careful analysis to identify how whiteness contributes to privilege.[6] Critics of white privilege also propose alternative definitions of whiteness and exceptions to or limits of white identity, arguing that the concept of "white privilege" ignores important differences between white subpopulations and individuals and suggesting that the notion of whiteness cannot be inclusive of all white people.[7][8] They note a problem with the interpretation of people of color, in that it fails to acknowledge the diversity of people of color and ethnicity within these groups.[6] Conservative critics have offered more direct critiques of the concept; one writes that "today ... the lives of minorities are no longer stunted by prejudice and 'white privilege'",[9] while another says that the concept is a danger to the project of achieving an equal society.[10]
Gina Crosley-Corcoran in her Huffington Post article, "Explaining White Privilege to a Broke White Person", says that she was initially hostile to the idea that she had white privilege, initially believing "my white skin didn't do shit to prevent me from experiencing poverty", until she was directed to read Peggy McIntosh's "Unpacking the invisible knapsack". According to Crosley-Corcoran, "the concept of intersectionality recognizes that people can be privileged in some ways and definitely not privileged in others." [11] Other writers have noted that the "academic-sounding concept of white privilege" sometimes elicits defensiveness and misunderstanding among white people, in part due to the rapidity in which the concept of white privilege was rapidly brought into the mainstream spotlight through social media campaigns such as Black Lives Matter.[12] Cory Weinburg, writing for Inside Higher Ed, has stated that the concept of white privilege is frequently misinterpreted by non-academics because it is an academic concept that has been recently been brought into the mainstream. Academics interviewed by Weinburg, who have been otherwise studying white privilege undisturbed for decades, have been taken aback with the seemingly-sudden hostility from right-wing critics since 2014............
Read the rest of this drivel if you will on the Wikipedia site.
Black Chancer Whines About White Privilege While Defrauding His Landlord [ 26 January 2021 ]
QUOTE
England footballer Daniel Sturridge has lost his racial discrimination and harassment claim against his landlord over a child's Netflix account labelled 'n*****'.Sturridge and his partner Jamilla Ferreira rented an £18,500-per-month Cheshire mansion from Alan O'Neill and his wife Katie in October 2018, during the footballer's six-year stint at Liverpool. But, less than two months after they moved in, Sturridge and Ms Ferreira discovered a profile called 'n*****' [ Nigger presumably ] when they accessed the O'Neills' Netflix app on their Apple TV account.
The pair demanded £100,000 of damages for 'discrimination' and 'harassment on the grounds of their race'. But a judge today dismissed Sturridge's claim and said Mrs O'Neill made 'a genuine attempt to apologise' for the account - which belonged to their 11-year-old son.
The profile - which Sturridge and Ms Ferreira discovered on November 24 - showed a caricature of a black person along with n-word.
Court documents reportedly show that the O'Neills - who had moved to California with their children - 'profusely' apologised and said they were not aware of the account.
They said their son was a fan of black music, especially rap, and would have heard the term while listening to it..............
The letter, reported in The Times, read: 'Your son can play act this word, but at the end of the day he goes back to his privileged "white skin" existence.'..............
Correspondence between the families became heated when the O'Neills pursued Sturridge in the county court for £67,000 of unpaid rent. Sturridge paid the rent in July 2019 but then filed a different claim for damages 'in respect of the defendants' discrimination against them and/or harassment on the grounds of their race'. [ races in fact - Ed. ]
Just days before the discovery of the account in November, Sturridge had been charged with allegedly breaching FA betting rules.
He was slapped with a £75,000 fine and was banned for six weeks - but four of the weeks were suspended.
UNQUOTE
Sturridge is a deeply unpleasant chancer on the make, piggy backing on the Lunatic Fringe's assault on White Men, the creators of Western Civilization. The Mail's readers take the point.