Double Jeopardy

Double jeopardy is being tried twice for the same crime. The purpose is to prevent Malicious Prosecution, especially those promoted by the regime. That is what is happening to the Englishmen accused of doing the Lawrence Job i.e. killing a black. Her Majesty's Government has perverted the law to get them. They are, like Her Allegedly Loyal Opposition malicious Racists who hate England. The Criminal Justice Act 2003 permits double jeopardy retrospectively precisely because of official malice in this one particular case. Blacks of course get a much more relaxed attitude.

Double Jeopardy ex Wiki
QUOTE
Double jeopardy is a procedural defense that forbids a defendant from being tried again on the same, or similar charges following a legitimate acquittal or conviction. At common law a defendant may enter a peremptory plea of autrefois acquit or autrefois convict (autrefois means "previously" in French), meaning the defendant has been acquitted or convicted of the same offense.

If this issue is raised, evidence will be placed before the court, which will normally rule as a preliminary matter whether the plea is substantiated, and if it so finds, the projected trial will be prevented from proceeding. In many countries the guarantee against being "twice put in jeopardy" is a constitutional right; these include India, Mexico, and the United States. In other countries, the protection is afforded by statute law.........

Following the murder of Stephen Lawrence, the Macpherson Report suggested that double jeopardy should be abrogated where "fresh and viable" new evidence came to light, and the Law Commission recommended in 2001 that it should be possible to subject an acquitted murder suspect to a second trial. The Parliament of the United Kingdom implemented these recommendations by passing the Criminal Justice Act 2003, introduced by then Home Secretary David Blunkett. The double jeopardy provisions of the Act came into force in April 2005, but are applicable to crimes committed before then.

Under the 2003 Act, retrials are now allowed if there is "new" and "compelling" evidence [ which means whatever they want it to mean - Editor ] for certain serious crimes, including murder, manslaughter, kidnapping, rape, armed robbery, and serious drug crimes. All such retrials must be approved by the Director of Public Prosecutions, and the Court of Appeal must agree to quash the original acquittal.
UNQUOTE
Allegations that there is new and compelling evidence in the Stephen Lawrence Job case will doubtless be spurious. The motive is hate and a determination to foist millions of blacks onto us. It is Malicious Prosecution in order to promote Ethnic Fouling In England.
PS Her Majesty's Government would not get away with this in less corrupt jurisdictions like India and Mexico.

 

Errors & omissions, broken links, cock ups, over-emphasis, malice [ real or imaginary ] or whatever; if you find any I am open to comment.

Email me at Mike Emery. All financial contributions are cheerfully accepted. If you want to keep it private, use my PGP key.  Home

Updated  on Thursday, 06 October 2016 19:14:39