Malicious Prosecution

Malicious prosecution is an abuse of power. That is to state the obvious. The Wikipedia puts a view. We have some recent [ February 2014 ] candidates, Bill Roache & Dave Lee Travis who were unimportant. They were well known because of acting. They were tried on very flimsy evidence and cleared by juries. This contrasts with Greville Janner, a Jew and politician who works the Holocaust® Racket. He was accused on oath of being a Paedophile. Janner was never charged. Instead he was promoted into the House of Lords so that people could not vote against him. Jimmy Savile seems rather different. Lots of people knew; even more suspected but the BBC liked his sort. Covering up for Paedophiles was all of a piece with marketing Homosexuality, their favourite hobby.

Janner was however transferred from the Commons to the Lords so that people could not vote against him. He proved that the Labour Party is deeply, sincerely corrupt, that it panders to Zionist crazies. Harassing little people is different though. It's not what you know; it's who you know.
PS Lest we forget Blair Is A War Criminal On The Run, one who has never even been charged. Whoever gives the Director of Public Prosecutions his job knows that he won't bite the hand that feeds him.

William Roache ex Wiki
"On 1 May 2013, Roache was arrested on suspicion of having raped a 15-year-old girl in 1967"
He was arrested over 40 years later. There was no forensic evidence, presumably no independent witness evidence and no evidence by way of admission. Was there a case to answer? It doesn't sound like it. He walked.

 

Dave Lee Travis
"
In October 2012, it was alleged by two former BBC employees that Travis sexually assaulted several women during his time at the BBC. One of the women, who was 17 at the time, claimed in the media after making a formal statement to police that Travis put his hand up her skirt in 1977.[18] The other, presenter Vivien Creegor, claimed Travis "jiggled her breasts" when she was live on BBC Radio 4 in the 1980s.[18] ............. In October 2013, Travis was charged with and pleaded not guilty to 14 allegations of indecent assault and one of sexual assault between 1976 and 2008, relating to 11 female complainants aged between 15 and 29 at the time of the alleged offences.[5]"
Another case with forensic and no independent witnesses albeit the number of women alleging crime makes it sound worse. How did he get away with for thirty years?

 

Michael Le Vell ex Wiki
"
In September 2011, Le Vell was accused of a sexual offence, which he strenuously denied.[8][15] In January 2012, the Crown Prosecution Service dropped the case, citing insufficient evidence.[10][16] On 14 February 2013, Alison Levitt QC, principal legal adviser to the Director of Public Prosecutions, stated that she had reviewed a decision not to prosecute Le Vell following allegations made against him in 2011.[17] She authorised Greater Manchester Police to charge Le Vell[18][19] with 19 offences.[17][18]

ITV announced that Le Vell would not be appearing in Coronation Street "pending the outcome of legal proceedings".[20][21] Le Vell stated: "I am innocent of these charges and intend to fight them vigorously."[22] He pleaded not guilty to all 19 charges.[23][24] During the trial at Manchester Crown Court, his barrister described the accuser's evidence as containing a series of inconsistencies.[25] On 10 September 2013, Le Vell was found not guilty on all counts.[26] "
This is another weak case.

 

Malicious Prosecution ex Wiki
QUOTE
Malicious prosecution is a common law intentional tort, while like the tort of abuse of process, its elements include (1) intentionally (and maliciously) instituting and pursuing (or causing to be instituted or pursued) a legal action (civil or criminal) that is (2) brought without probable cause and (3) dismissed in favor of the victim of the malicious prosecution. In some jurisdictions, the term "malicious prosecution" denotes the wrongful initiation of criminal proceedings, while the term "malicious use of process" denotes the wrongful initiation of civil proceedings

Criminal prosecuting attorneys and judges are protected, by doctrines of prosecutorial immunity and judicial immunity, from tort liability for malicious prosecution. Moreover, the mere filing of a complaint cannot constitute an abuse of process. The parties who have abused or misused the process, have gone beyond merely filing a lawsuit. The taking [ sic ] of an appeal, even a frivolous one, is not enough to constitute an abuse of process. The mere filing or maintenance of a lawsuit, even for an improper purpose, is not a proper basis for an abuse of process action. See also Barratry, Vexatious litigation Frivolous lawsuit, Immunity from prosecution, Restraining order abuse, Selective Prosecution
UNQUOTE
This lets corrupt prosecutors off the hook; a pity.

 


Corrupt Government Harasses Men Of The Parachute Regiment While IRA Murderers Walk Free [  11 November 2015 ]
QUOTE
Veterans, MPs and former military commanders demand to know why former soldiers are being investigated for murder when so many former terrorists were released under the Good Friday Agreement..........

Paratroopers who opened fire on rioters on Bloody Sunday feel “betrayed” after a former soldier was held on suspicion of murder and police warned of more arrests to follow. The 66-year-old ex-Lance Corporal became the first member of the British armed forces to be arrested by detectives investigating the deaths of 14 men at a protest march in Londonderry in 1972...........

Meanwhile MPs and former military commanders demanded to know why former soldiers were being investigated for murder when so many former terrorists were released under the Good Friday Agreement.
UNQUOTE
"The Telegraph" tells us that men feel ""betrayed"". Why does "The Telegraph" use "inverted commas"? To imply that there is some doubt about this bit of treachery but then "The Telegraph" is also called "The Quislinggraph" with reason. Recall that Cameron is a war criminal, currently murdering Syrians, after killing people in Libya. He is also keeping Blair out of prison after he helped Bush murder hundreds of thousands in Iraq. He does not go in for Equality Before The Law; it only applies to honest folk.
PS A message for any man who reads this - REMEMBER NUMBER, RANK & NAME - NOTHING ELSE - see Resistance to Interrogation to know why.

 

Farmer Shoots Burglar Doing A Bit Of Thieving So He Is Prosecuted While The Crook Walks Free [ 10 March 2017 ]
QUOTE
Farmer weeps as jury CLEARS him of GBH in just 24 minutes after he was put on trial for shooting a convicted burglar 'who was stealing diesel from his farm'.............

Father-of-three Kenneth Hugill, 83, who had two hip replacements and a heart-bypass operation was arrested, finger printed and forced to fund his own £30,000 defence after he shot Richard Stables, 44, in the foot outside his isolated farmhouse at Wilberfoss, near York...........

Today his family revealed that following the incident their home was surrounded by armed police and a helicopter who believed they were holding a hostage more than 15 hours after the shooting. [ Grotesque incompetence - Editor ].....................

Richard Stables, a convicted burglar, was hit in the foot and driven straight to hospital by his friend Adrian Barron, a seasoned criminal with convictions for burglary and violence.

Mr Stables suffered serious [ sic ] injuries but survived and gave evidence as a prosecution witness.

The terrified farmer, who walks with a crutch and has never previously been in trouble with the law, ended up being charged with grievous bodily harm and put on trial at Hull Crown Court..........

Once back inside the farmhouse he phoned his son who lives nearby, and the son called police, although they did not come out that night.
UNQUOTE
The Crown Prosecution Service chooses to allege that their Prosecution Principles are based on having enough evidence & acting in the public interest. The people that it mounted a Malicious Prosecution against after they showed Undercover Mosque full of  Islamic criminals inciting Race hatred aren't fool enough to believe them. Nor was the Judge who ruled against them after the CPS chose to Libel the programme makers. Notice the police track record here; idle, didn't bother to show up then made up a story a hostage situation.

 

English Democrat Leader Gets Nine Months For Election Fraud  [ 15 March 2017 ]
QUOTE
A disgraced far-right activist has been jailed today for cheating the election system by submitting fraudulent nomination forms.   English Democrats regional leader Steven Uncles used fictitious names such as Anna Cleves - a play on the name of Henry VIII’s fourth wife, Anne of Cleves, who lived in Dartford - and Rachelle Stevens - referred to by a judge as “the lady from S Club 7”.   The 53-year-old local politician, who has since resigned from the post, was convicted last month of seven charges of using a false instrument with intent and two of causing or permitting a false statement to be included in a nomination form.........

“The more candidates you put up at local elections, the greater the publicity that is attached to the aims and policies of the English Democrats. You have subverted the democratic process.”..........

“I bear in mind you are not going to do this again, but the public as a whole must have confidence in the electoral system which you have so seriously undermined.”
UNQUOTE
The man is a crook; he went down for it; the judge made the right noises. Fair enough but when it came to Lutfur Rahman, a corrupt lawyer, long the mayor of Tower Hamlets due to blatant corruption it was different. Her Majesty's Government allowed Rahman and his henchmen to do it because they are Pakistani thieves. It took citizens to prosecute the Vote Rigging while Rahman stays out of prison. This is Selective Prosecution being used to Pervert The Course Of Justice & promote the Ethnic Fouling Of England.