Tobias Langdon writing in the Occidental Observer tells us that politicians, police and Feminists are colluding to protect the Pakistani Perverts who were and are Raping, murdering, prostituting and degrading English girls in Rochdale & Rotherham as well as other sad little towns in the north of England. His article is Much Worse than Rotherham: How British Politicians, Police and Feminists Are Guilty of Systemic Rape. He tells us inter alia about Maggie Oliver, a policewoman who worked on an investigation into child sex-abuse called Operation Augusta and saw at first hand that senior police weren’t serious about ending child sexual abuse. She called their conduct Criminal negligence and Misfeasance In Public Office. Was she wrong? NO! Was she accused of Libel? NO! The truth is a weapon; she used it.
Notice that the Wikipedia chose to write up Maggie Oliver but not Operation Augusta. Further that the misfeasance cases it mentions involve money rather than gross criminality. It is a de facto part of the cover up. However Graham Stringer, an MP makes the right noises. See The failure of Operation Augusta gives us reason to doubt improvements on child protection. Will they translate into action? He is a Labour Party wallah who panders to Jews. So don't hold your breath waiting.
Misfeasance In Public Office ex Wiki
Misfeasance in public office is a cause of action in the civil courts of England and Wales and certain Commonwealth countries. It is an action against the holder of a public office, alleging in essence that the office-holder has misused or abused their power.[1] The tort can be traced back to 1703 when Chief Justice Sir John Holt decided that a landowner could sue a police constable who deprived him of his right to vote (Ashby v White).[2] The tort was revived in 1985 when it was used so that French turkey producers could sue the Ministry of Agriculture over a dispute that harmed their sales.Generally, a civil defendant will be liable for misfeasance if the defendant owed a duty of care toward the plaintiff, the defendant breached that duty of care by improperly performing a legal act, and the improper performance resulted in harm to the plaintiff.
In theory, misfeasance is distinct from nonfeasance. Nonfeasance is a failure to act that results in harm to another party. Misfeasance, by contrast, is some affirmative act that, though legal, causes harm. In practice, the distinction is confusing and uninstructive. Courts often have difficulty determining whether harm resulted from a failure to act or from an act that was improperly performed.
Grounds
In most cases, the essentials to bring an action of misfeasance in public office are that the office-holder acted illegally, knew they were doing so, and knew or should reasonably have known that third parties would suffer loss as a result...........See also
Only Non-White Lives Matter
The British media haven’t been been trying to answer this question, but
in fact the answer is already known. The Rotherham scandal was horrific, but
much worse things have been happening elsewhere in Britain. Rape-gangs of
Pakistanis and other non-Whites have been operating with the complicity not
just of supposed feminists in the Labour party but also of the police. Let’s
take the big city of Manchester, where a policewoman called
Maggie Oliver
worked on an investigation into child sex-abuse called Operation Augusta,
which began sixteen years ago in 2004. As Maggie Oliver witnessed at first
hand, senior officers weren’t serious about ending child sexual abuse. And
unlike many thousands of her tough male colleagues who witnessed the same
thing both in Manchester and elsewhere, Oliver wasn’t prepared to be
complicit in what
she calls “gross criminal neglect and misfeasance in public office” by
those senior officers.