Ahmaud Arbery Nausea

A black criminal was out there acting suspiciously. Was he looking for things to steal? Probably. The men who tried to arrest him were attacked. The black got shot in self defence. Those are the bare bones of the story. The authorities decided not to prosecute; essentially that there was no case to answer. Then, after political pressure a prosecution was mounted. Three White Men were charged, tried, convicted & sentenced to long terms in prison.

The jury was eleven white and one black; they swallowed the prosecution story. The judge, Timothy Walmsley chose to claim that the facts of Arbery's lengthy criminal record were not Admissible In Evidence, so the jury was misled. Was Walmsley bent, biased, leaned on or what? Given the fact that Georgia Repeals Citizen's Arrest Law on account of Ahmaud Arbery proves political malfeasance. You can believe the Wiki's version of reality if you want.

It seem entirely clear that malice in a defensive killing was never proved; there was just no evidence for it. Albeit #Fred Reed, also a white man and a Southerner to boot argues contra.

This was clearly a Malicious Prosecution set up by Anti-White Racists, e.g. the government of Georgia. That includes the Attorney General of Georgia, Chris Carr. see #Carr Announces Indictment of former Brunswick DA for Violation of Oath of Public Officer and Obstruction of a Law Enforcement Officer Office of Attorney General of Georgia

 

 

Justice For Ahmaud Arbery?
QUOTE
The convicted murderers of Ahmaud Arbery were sentenced yesterday. Travis McMichael, who is 35 and pulled the trigger, got life in prison with no possibility of parole. His 66-year-old father Greg, who was riding with him, got the same, so both will die in prison – barring appeal. William “Roddie” Bryan, 52, who drove separately and took a cellphone video of the fatal moments, got life with the possibility of parole after 30 years, when he will 82.

This is outrageous punishment for three men who clearly had no intention of killing or even harming anyone. Race was at the heart of this; if Arbery had been white, this case would surely never have gone to trial. I wrote a detailed account of the trial and verdicts here. These life sentences have to be understood in context.

The Satilla Shores neighborhood on the Georgia coast where the incident took place had seen a rash of petty crimes. Residents bought security cameras and stopped letting children play outside at night. Ahmaud Arbery was caught on video five times – mostly at night – wandering through a building under construction a few doors from where the McMichaels lived.

Twelve days before the shooting, Travis McMichael saw Arbery at the building. He got a gun, called police, and with another armed neighbor, searched the building, but Arbery was gone. The responding officer thanked the men for their vigilance and did not say they should not have been armed.

On the day of the shooting, Arbery was again at the building. A neighbor spotted him, and he sprinted away. The McMichaels saw him running, recognized him from videos, and chased him in their pickup. Travis, who had thought Arbery might be armed from the way he acted the first time he saw him, took a shotgun, and his father Greg had a pistol. They followed for five minutes, and several times came close enough to shout out the window, “Stop. We want to talk to you.” They called 911. At some point, Mr. Bryan joined the chase and took the video.

The McMichaels gave up following Arbery and parked in a place where they could get a good view of cross streets, so they could tell the police which way Arbery went. What happened next is on the video: Arbery could have run around their truck and kept going – he had already done that twice – or he could have turned off the road into unfenced land. Instead, he ran toward the pickup, darted around it, and made for Travis, who was holding a shotgun. The moment of contact is off camera, but the men are seen grappling for the gun as shots go off.

The first prosecutor on the case, George Barnhill, interviewed the three men, watched the video, and wrote a report to explain why he did not bring charges. He stated that the men were making a legal citizen’s arrest, were legally armed, and had probable cause to think Arbery was a burglar. Mr. Barnhill added, “[A]t the point Arbery grabbed the shotgun, under Georgia law, McMichael was allowed to use deadly force to protect himself.” Mr. Bryan later released the video, thinking it would calm blacks who were complaining that charges should be brought. Instead, there was outrage.

The ensuing trial was not fair. The judge refused to change venue. Throughout jury selection and all during the trial, blacks demonstrated, loudly demanding “justice for Ahmaud.” They marched through the neighborhood where Arbery was shot. Prominent blacks – Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, Martin Luther King III – sat in the courtroom with Arbery’s mother; the defense called this jury intimidation. Black preachers formed a “prayer wall” outside the courthouse, and on at least one occasion, New Black Panthers patrolled with guns.

The judge, Timothy Walmsley, excluded all of the following evidence: Arbery had a record. He ran from police who saw he had a gun. He had shoplifting convictions, and had a reputation among store owners as “The Jogger,” who would steal and then run away. He was so volatile his mother called the police on him, warning that he might get violent. Arbery was diagnosed with schizoaffective disorder and put on Zyprexa, an anti-psychotic; it was not in his system on autopsy. There was a small amount of THC in his blood, which makes people with his condition irritable and impulsive. Arbery was on probation for two crimes when he was killed, which probably made him reluctant to talk about what he was doing in the building that day.

In the evidence admitted at trial there was nothing about race, but in her closing argument, Prosecutor Linda Dunikoski claimed that Arbery was shot “because he was a black man running down the street.” A jury of nine white women, two white men and one black man took only 10 hours to find Travis guilty of “malice murder” — the Georgia equivalent of first-degree, premeditated murder. The law assumes malice when “all the circumstances of the killing show an abandoned and malignant heart.” Gregory was found guilty of “felony murder,” which is a lesser charge, but carries the same penalty of a minimum of 30 years and possible life. Mr. Bryan was also found guilty of “felony murder,” because he tried to box Arbery in with his pickup.

At the time of the killing, Georgia had a broad citizens’ arrest law – since gutted by the state legislature and denounced by Gov. Brian Kemp as “a Civil War-era law ripe for abuse.” It is legal to carry weapons in Georgia. It is legal to drive alongside someone and ask him to stop and talk. It is legal to use deadly force if you have good reason to think your life is in danger. The prosecution argued that since the McMichaels had gone looking for Arbery they could not then claim self-defense. Does that mean Travis was supposed to let Arbery beat him to death or take away his shotgun and shoot him?

Should the men have got off Scott free? District Attorney Barnhill though so. Mr. Bryan certainly should have walked away. And if the McMichaels are guilty of anything, they certainly don’t have “abandoned and malignant” hearts and don’t deserve to die in prison.

At yesterday’s sentencing, Arbery’s family gave what the New York Times called “wrenching” victim statements. His sister Jasmine said the three men thought Arbery was a “dangerous criminal” because of his dark skin and curly hair. Arbery’s father said the men “lynch[ed] my son in broad daylight” and denounced “their evil and hate.” Arbery’s mother, Wanda Cooper-Jones, said that raising him was “the honor of my life,” adding that the three men “were fully committed to their crime” and “chose to target my son because they didn’t want him in their community. . . . When they couldn’t sufficiently scare him or intimidate him, they killed him.”

We expect emotional, imaginative stuff from black victims, but not from judges. Judge Walmsley agreed with Miss Cooper-Jones, and said, “I kept coming back to the terror that must have been in the young man running through Satilla Shores.” He called for a minute of silence in the courtroom and asked everyone to imagine the horror of running for your life for that long. “Ahmaud Arbery was then hunted down and shot,” he added.

This is as fanciful as anything the family said. If the men wanted to kill Arbery, they could have shot him at any time during those five minutes. Instead, they called 911. The judge called the video “absolutely chilling.”

Judge Walmsley was in the courtroom and heard all the evidence; I wasn’t there. Nor is a judge supposed to be intimidated by demonstrations, Black Panthers with rifles, prayer walls, and black celebrities in the courtroom, but I am shocked. Those men – none with a criminal record and two with law-enforcement training – were trying to keep their neighborhood safe. There is no reason to think they wanted to hurt Arbery, and Travis did not fire until he was in a fight for his gun – and, he thought, for his life.

Travis McMichael splashed with Arbery’s blood after his close encounter with Arbery. When an officer asked if he was alright, he replied, “I’m not alright. I just shot someone.”

At sentencing, Prosecutor Linda Dunikosky said Arbery was “trapped” and had no choice but to turn and fight. Wrong. He could have run in any direction and not been shot – but he would probably would have been arrested.

State-imposed life sentences aren’t enough for these men. All three now face federal “hate crime” charges because they allegedly “used force and threats of force to intimidate and interfere with Arbery’s right to use a public street because of his race.” That trial begins February 7, and the men face up to life in prison – again – and six-figure fines.

The New York Times says Miss Cooper-Jones is “bracing herself” for the ordeal of another trial. Really? I think she is looking forward to it. The feds asked her if she would accept a plea deal, in which the McMichaels would get federal sentences of 30 years and no trial if they admitted they had been motivated by hate. She said no. “I’ll be there every day,” she said. “They need to answer to those charges as well.”

What, one wonders, is she living on that lets her sit in court every day, as she did during the state trial? She has filed a civil suit for millions of dollars against the three men, and against the original prosecutors who did not bring charges, but that payday is far off.

The McMichaels are on hard times. The two men were living with Leigh McMichael, who is Greg’s wife and Travis’s mother. The family was reportedly deep in debt even before the Arbery incident because of Leigh’s cancer and “overwhelming medical bills.” Leigh has worked as a hospice nurse. She sobbed as she testified at trial for the defense, and was present with daughter Lindsey McMichael for the verdict. They were described afterwards as “devastated.” There were no family members at the sentencing.

Has the “close-knit” Satilla Shores community stood by Mrs. McMichael or is she a pariah? Travis has a five-year-old son; what does he think of any of this? How will Leigh McMichael take care of him in a household that has lost two wage-earners? Has she thought about crowd funding? We can be sure there will be no sympathetic media profiles.

At yesterday’s sentencing, prosecutor Linda Dunikoski asked the judge not to allow the three convicted men “to make any money off of their actions such as a book deal, a movie deal, social media deal, or anything,” adding that any money they ever make should go to the Arbery family. Judge Walmsley said he would think about it.

After the verdict, Miss Cooper-Jones emerged from the courthouse to loud cheers and was photographed in a line with black supporters, all with their arms raised like boxing champions. Dozens of black-clad Panthers marched outside with black rifles. Needless to say, the right people are reveling in the sentences. One tabloid on the reactions titled its story “Go To Jail, Then Hell.”

At the time of the verdict, the McMichaels’ lawyers said, “These are two men who honestly believe that what they were doing was the right thing to do.” No one seems to be saying that now, and if anyone – even one conservative commentator – has said a good word for these men, I haven’t heard it.

I keep thinking about Travis McMichael’s little boy. What will his life be like? Will he grow up a proud, tough Southerner who had to fight for his family’s honor against every bully who called his father and grandfather “racist killers”? Or will he change his name and slink away – and spend his life groveling? I’m afraid I know the answer.
UNQUOTE
Jared Taylor reads as fair in this article.

 

 Carr Announces Indictment of former Brunswick DA for Violation of Oath of Public Officer and Obstruction of a Law Enforcement Officer Office of Attorney General of Georgia
The charges are at Indictment-SuperiorCourtGlynn.pdf. The claim is that she failed to prosecute white men because she is not an Anti-White Racist. It is further proof of Malice Aforethought.

 

Admissible Evidence ex Wiki
Admissible evidence, in a court of law, is any testimonial, documentary, or tangible evidence that may be introduced to a factfinder—usually a judge or jury—to establish or to bolster a point put forth by a party to the proceeding. For evidence to be admissible, it must be relevant and "not excluded by the rules of evidence",[1] which generally means that it must not be unfairly prejudicial, and it must have some indicia of reliability. The general rule in evidence is that all relevant evidence is admissible and all irrelevant evidence is inadmissible, though some countries (such as the United States and, to an extent, Australia) proscribe the prosecution from exploiting evidence obtained in violation of constitutional law, thereby rendering relevant evidence inadmissible. This rule of evidence is called the exclusionary rule. In the United States this was effectuated federally in 1914 under the Supreme Court case Weeks v. United States and incorporated against the states in 1961 in the case Mapp v. Ohio, both of which involving law enforcement conducting warrantless searches of the petitioners' homes, with incriminating evidence being described inside them.

 

Black Terrorists With Guns Menace Court After Arbery Murder Trial  [ 10 January 2022 ]
QUOTE
An armed black terror militia of hundreds menaced a courthouse on Friday after the sentencing was complete in the murder trial of fake jogger Armaud Arbery. Three men – Travis McMichael, Gregory McMichael, and William “Roddie” Bryan – were sentenced to life in prison for killing Arbery as he lunged for a gun while fleeing a robbery scene.............

An organizer reported that various supremacist groups, including the New Black Panther Party for Self-Defense, Original Black Panther Militia, United Black Power Militia, Panthers Movement and Lion of Judah Armed Forces, participated in the armed terror march.

“These are black self-defense groups who are committed to organizing and defending our people on a permanent basis. We’re thankful that these defendants have been convicted, but the problem of our people has not been solved by one conviction. Our people must organize. Our people must train. Our people recognize the threat of the Klan, and the threat of white vigilantism in this area and all over the country is alive and well,” the organizer stated in his declaration of war.

The black terror groups menaced the courthouse to make it clear to observers that there will be severe consequences if the Black Lives Matter mob is not appeased by verdicts and sentencings. This is the new standard of justice in a nation occupied by diversity.

Big League Politics has reported on how crucial evidence was suppressed in the Arbery case in order to set up a show trial for the white defendants: 

A Georgia circuit court judge has determined that Armaud Arbery’s history of posing as a jogger in order to commit robberies will not be allowed to be presented at his murder trial.
UNQUOTE
Have Blacks been incited to hate people by the Mainstream Media & other Subversives? Believe it. Are they encouraged in Israel? No! The Racist thugs, the Zionist crazies running the Stolen Land put them in Concentration Camps such as Saharonim pending deportation.

 

Murder of Ahmaud Arbery ex Wiki
QUOTE
On February 23, 2020, Ahmaud Marquez Arbery (born May 8, 1994), a 25-year-old Black man, was murdered in Satilla Shores, a neighborhood near Brunswick in Glynn County, Georgia, United States.[3][4][5] Arbery was jogging when three White residents decided to pursue him: Travis McMichael and his father Gregory, who were armed and in one vehicle, and William "Roddie" Bryan, who was in another vehicle and recorded the pursuit and shooting on his cell phone. After the three chased Arbery for several minutes and falsely imprisoned him, Travis McMichael got out of his truck and assaulted Arbery with a shotgun, then shot him three times as Arbery attempted to defend himself.[3][4]

Members of the Glynn County Police Department (GCPD) arrived on the scene soon after the shooting, but no arrests were made for more than two months. The GCPD said the Brunswick District Attorney's Office first advised them to make no arrests,[6] then Waycross District Attorney George Barnhill twice advised the GCPD to make no arrests, once before he was officially assigned to the case,[7][8] and once while announcing his intention to recuse due to a conflict of interest.[8][9][10] At the behest of Gregory McMichael,[11] a local attorney provided Bryan's video to local radio station WGIG, which published the video on May 5.[12] The video went viral[13] on YouTube and Twitter.[14][15] The Georgia Bureau of Investigation (GBI) arrested the McMichaels on May 7 and Bryan on May 21, charging them with felony murder and other crimes.[16][17][18]

The case was ultimately transferred to the Cobb County District Attorney's Office.[19][20][21] On June 24, 2020, a grand jury indicted each of the three men on charges of malice murder, felony murder, and other crimes.[1] Their trial began in November 2021 in the Glynn County Superior Court;[22][23] all three were convicted on November 24 of felony murder, aggravated assault, false imprisonment and criminal attempt to commit false imprisonment.[24][25] Travis McMichael was further convicted of malice murder.[26] On January 7, 2022, the McMichaels were sentenced to life imprisonment with no possibility of parole plus 20 years, with Bryan sentenced to life imprisonment with the possibility of parole after 30 years.[27][28]

The local authorities' handling of the case resulted in nationwide criticism and debates on racial profiling in the United States.[29][30] Many religious leaders, politicians, athletes, and other celebrities condemned the incident.[31] Georgia Attorney General Christopher M. Carr formally requested the intervention of the Federal Bureau of Investigation in the case on May 10, 2020, which was granted the following day.[32][33][34] In April 2021, a federal grand jury indicted the three men, charging all with a hate crime and attempted kidnapping, while the McMichaels were also charged with using firearms during a crime of violence.[2] Separately, former Brunswick District Attorney Jackie Johnson was indicted in September 2021 for "showing favor and affection" to Gregory (her former subordinate) during the investigation, and for obstructing law enforcement by directing that Travis not be arrested.[35][36] In the aftermath of the murder, Georgia enacted hate crimes legislation in June 2020,[37] then repealed and replaced its citizen's arrest law in May 2021.[38]
UNQUOTE
Biased or what?

 

 

Fred on Everything

by

 Fred Reed

 

Bads, Wads, and the Unlikelihood of Reason: Thoughts on the Verdicts

Oh God, oh God. Can we humans not contract out our governance to, say, cephalopods and stop trying to manage our own affairs? I mean, really. Girl octopodes are both smart and leggy. They aren’t crazy. What more do we want?

Recently we have had the verdicts in the Rittenhouse and Arbery trials, with which I assume the reader to be at least broadly familiar. If you are not, I congratulate you for avoiding the grocery-store tabloid intellectual level regnant in America.

Today, everything is identity politics, emotion, and herd instinct. Loyalty to one’s herd trumps all else, to include truth. Outside the courtroom, treatment of both trials was racial, ideological and, often, disingenuous if not dishonest. Inside the courtroom, neither was. This pack-instinct politics is an embarrassment.

In both cases, we have Black Advocates, and White Advocates (hereinafter Bads and Wads to avoid typing fatigue) squalling at each other. The Wads have never seen a white man who was guilty and the Bads, one who wasn’t. I don’t think I have ever encountered so much tendentious twaddle in one place, and I have lived in Washington.

But the juries got both right. For a practicing curmudgeon, this is devastating. There may be a hidden underlying vein of reason in the country.

In the Rittenhouse matter, the case, that the kid shot in self-defense, is obvious on the facts.   The jury agreed. In Arbery, the defense of the killers is weak, contrived, and illogical. The jury agreed.

Now, Arbery, briefly. Arbery was a black man who on at least five occasions (is said to have) entered a suburban house under construction, walked around, sometimes on surveillance video, and left without stealing anything. In Georgia, this is called “criminal trespass,” and is a misdemeanor, like littering. No theft, no vandalism, no burglary, no felony.

On the day of his death, Arbery, a known jogger, came out of the house, carrying nothing, not anything stolen, not a weapon, not a cellphone, and ran down the street. The three killers, assuming on no evidence that he must have committed a crime, began chasing him in two pickups. They ran him down in a chase lasting five minutes, used the trucks to force him in desired directions, trapped him on a street between the trucks. Apparently Arbery, exhausted and desperate, cornered, attacked the guy who had a twelve-gauge pump, who killed him with it. One of the three took video during the chase.

They later said they killed him in self-defense and claimed that they were conducting a citizen’s arrest. The latter claim, farfetched and not occurring until well after the event, was the only possible defense a lawyer could come up with. I suspect a lawyer did come up with it.

The self-defense approach doesn’t fly. If you are the aggressors, as for example chasing with pickups a frightened man, and you kill him when he finally fights back, in law you cannot claim self-defense. And when the odds are three men and two guns against an unarmed defender, self-defense is not persuasive.

Here the story becomes sordid and reminiscent of the Old South. When I heard shortly after the killing that there would be no indictments, I thought, uh-huh, the fix is in. Sounds like good ol’ boys protecting good ol’ boys. This was uncharitable, and I had no evidence, but…I grew up in the South.

And the fix was indeed in. One of the killers who had worked in law enforcement called his friend, Brunswick District Attorney Jackie Johnson, and got her to  prevent an investigation, for which she was later indicted on a felony charge. The investigation and arrest came months later and only after the video went viral.

The jury found all three guilty of murder, whereupon white advocates called the proceedings a show trial, political, with the jury being intimidated, anti-white, and the like.

None of this is true. (If you have the interest and spare time, here is the prosecutions case in its entirety. Judge for yourself.) In identity politics, a show trial is one in which the verdict is not the one one’s herd wants. The jury is then said to be woke, corrupt, left-wing, right-wing, suborned, racist, white-hating, what have you It can’t be that the jury even-handedly pondered the facts and came to a considered conclusion.

Wads, as much as Bads, just make up evidence.  Various WADs stated as fact that Arbery, who frequently jogged through the neighborhood, did so “casing” it for future theft. Since there is no evidence that Arbery committed burglary, ever, this is invention. There is much inuendo, as for example stating that many thefts had occurred in the neighborhood and inviting the reader to conclude that Arbury was the thief. There is exactly no evidence for this.

In libel law this sort of thing is called “actual malice” or “reckless disregard of truth.” But the dead can’t sue.

Why the desperate attempt to find a felony for Arbery to have committed? Because without one,  the defense of making a citizen’s arrest doesn’t fly. That leaves them having hunted Arbery down and killed him with no authority to do so. This is called “murder.”

Citizen’s arrest: A private person may arrest an offender if the offense is committed in his presence or within his immediate knowledge. If the offense is a felony and the offender is escaping or attempting to escape, a person may arrest him on reasonable or probable grounds of suspicion.

The claim of making a citizen’s arrest smells to high heaven. There was no felony. Arbery came out of the house carrying nothing, as the killers could see. No felony had been committed in their presence since none had been committed at all. Further, statements by the three themselves show that they didn’t think Arbery had stolen anything, or didn’t know whether he had. These gut the defense of citizen’s arrest.

When the sheriff showed up, they would certainly have told him approximately, “We thought he was a burglar and so we wanted to hold him until the police came.” They didn’t. They didn’t tell Arbery they were making a citizen’s arrest.  

Many seem not to understand the importance of this. The only question in the trial was whether the three were conducting a legitimate citizen’s arrest. If not, then with no right or authority whatsoever they had chased down a man who had not committed a felony, and killed him. That, ladies and gentlemen, is called “murder.”

Let us consider events from Arbury’s standpoint. He was out for a jog, as he had been many times before. He poked around the building site, as he and others had done before. He stole nothing. He didn’t know that he was a burglar in the eyes of the three paladins of justice. He didn’t know that they were planning a citizen’s arrest (as in all probability they didn’t either.) Suddenly armed white men in a pickup accost him, trying to cut him off. This is terrifying. They don’t tell him why. One says, or later claims to have, “I want to talk to you,” probably not in a chirpy voice with a broad smile. From Arbury’s point of view, this is not promising. Remember, he lives in Georgia. Arbury doesn’t reply, as why should he? He tries to evade, which is exactly what I would do. It is, I suspect, what a white advocate would do if cut off by armed blacks.

What should he have done, trapped, probably scared witless, with a white man pointing a shotgun at him? What does a black man in these circumstances believe to be the intentions of his pursuers? A beating? A rope? Burning? Death? To a white advocate in northern suburbs these may seem silly questions. To a black in Georgia, they don’t. His decision, to fight, got him killed.

It is interesting here to ask what the identity groups would have said had the races been reversed. For example, if three blacks had run down a white college student in otherwise identical circumstances. Or if Rittenhouse had been a black kid attacked by Republicans, saying that his intent was to protect the right of BLM to hold lawful demonstrations. I think we all know the answer. And, when a nearly all-white jury in the Deep South convicts three white men of killing a black man, you can bet they believe it.

Guilty as charged.

Comments and Archive