Mesirah is the word Jews use for their code of silence.  The Wikipedia does not tell us that it is just like the Mafia's code of silence, the one they call Omerta. It what lawyers call Perverting the course of justice. Of course they, the Jews that is as well as the Wiki use it for the same reason, to conceal crime. Various Jews have fallen foul of it; the most recent being Richard Goldstone. He recanted somewhat after being leaned by vicious Jews in South Africa. His sin was to tell some of the truth about the Gaza Massacre. So did Ariel Toaff, both Jew and professor of history after writing Blood Libel Mesirah kept Bernie Madoff, a Jew naturally out of prison while he was setting world records as a thief. They invent their own words that tell us they are slobs - see Jews' Words.

The Failed Messiah, a Jew has much to say about mesirah. Professor MacDonald also tells the truth but first see the Wikipedia's version.

Mesirah ex - Wiki
Mesirah (or mesira, Hebrew: to turn over‎) is a proscribed action under Jewish law, consisting of informing on or turning a Jew over to non-Jewish authorities. This may not necessarily apply to reporting legitimate crimes to responsible authority, but does apply to turning over a Jew to an abusive authority, or to a legitimate one who would punish the criminal in ways seen as excessive by the Jewish community, though "excessive" punishment by non-Jews may be permissible if a precept of the Torah has been violated. The term for an individual who commits mesirah is a mossur.
That is the Wikipedia's story. I do not believe it. The Wikipedia  was set up with an agenda. It is quite reliable until an article offends them for whatever reason, usually to do with Jews. This is just such a case.


Outpourings Of Jewish Ethical Superiority by Kevin MacDonald
Mondoweiss has posted a summary of articles by rabidly pro-Israel rabbis who have waxed indignant about the Penn St. situation, basing their arguments on a rather tendentious reading of Jewish religious ethics. The article by Rabbi Moshe Leib Gray, the head of Chabad at Dartmouth (described by Mondoweiss as promoting Israel “to a faretheewell”) makes it clear that not informing when others are suffering is forbidden by Jewish ethics:

When it comes to saving a life, physically or spiritually, we must to do everything in our power to push aside our natural inclinations, to depart from our comfort zone and to speak harsh words; to do what is right, even when it challenges the will of God Almighty. (Emphasis in text)

This is a strong ethic indeed. Mondoweiss makes that point that these same rabbis manage to look the other way in the face of Palestinian suffering and Israeli ethnic cleansing. Good point.

Beyond that, these high-flown statements of Jewish ethics don’t seem to apply to mesirah–the prohibition against informing on other Jews. Some of the  most egregious examples of mesirah come from Orthodox Jewish communities like Rabbi Gray’s Chabade.g., this blog by John Graham which describes mesirah advocated by Agudath Israel in the case of reporting child abuse allegations within the Jewish community.
Jews let Paedophiles get away with it, even when their own children are victims. This is not good. It is corruption. It is Jews acting like Jews.

The Failed Messiah has much to say about mesirah, about Jews lying wholesale to conceal their Paedophile Jews


Goldstone Was Ostracized For Telling Some Of The Truth
(By Chris Moore) -- The New York Times has added a couple more pieces to the mystery puzzle of Richard Goldstone's sudden about-face in which he retracted key components of his commission's collective conclusion in a report presented to the U.N. that Israel had deliberately targeted civilians during the 2008–2009 Gaza war. [ See Gaza Massacre for some of the ugly truth, also Richard Goldstone - Editor ]

The retraction shocked and dismayed the three other commission members, who accused him of misrepresenting facts in order to cast doubt on the conclusions of the U.N.-sponsored, fact-finding team.

The New York Times reports that Judge Goldstone, a South African jurist who had previously officially indicted elements of
apartheid S. Africa's White-led government for state-sponsored murder, came under tremendous Jewish communal pressure in the wake the Goldstone commission's conclusion that Israel itself had committed war crimes.

In trying to understand why he published an essay on April 1 in The Washington Post retracting his harshest accusation against Israel and toughening his stand toward Hamas and the United Nations — an essay that has been rejected by the fellow members of his investigation panel — the South African precedent is important. For Mr. Goldstone, it was the model of how the Gaza report would work. Instead, it helped drive Israeli politics farther to the right, gave fuel to Israel’s enemies and brought no notable censure on Hamas.

“I know he was extremely hurt by the reaction to the report,” said Aryeh Neier, president of the Open Society Foundations, who has known Mr. Goldstone for years and remains close to him. “I think he was extremely uncomfortable in providing some fodder to people who were looking for anything they could use against Israel.”

In describing his new position, Mr. Goldstone wrote, “If I had known then what I know now, the Goldstone report would have been a different document.” He has declined requests to elaborate. Interviews with two dozen people who know him suggest a combination of reasons: the hostility from his community, disappointment about Hamas’s continuing attacks on civilians, and new understanding of Israel’s conduct in a few of the most deadly incidents of the war.

The year and a half since the Gaza report was published have been hard on Mr. Goldstone. Hailed by the Arab world and the anti-Israel left, he has been censured by those with whom he had always identified. One of his two daughters, who spent more than a decade in Israel and now lives in Canada with the man she married here, has been furious with him, according to a family friend; he was nearly unable to attend the bar mitzvah of his other daughter’s son in South Africa because of plans by some members of the Jewish community there to demonstrate against his presence.

“He told me last year that he was dreaming of the day when he would be able to sleep again at night,” a longtime friend said, asking for anonymity for fear of angering Mr. Goldstone by speaking about private conversations. In the past two weeks, he has been embraced by some who had shunned him...

In Sacramento, Mr. Goldstone told of a speech he gave at Yale in late 2009.

During the presentation, three men in the hall unfurled a banner listing what they viewed as great libels directed at the Jewish people: “Protocols of the Elders of Zion — Dreyfus — Goldstone.”

The first referred to a Russian forgery alleging Jewish plans to rule the world, and the second to the framing of a Jewish army officer in France who was accused in 1894 of passing military secrets to the Germans.

Goldstone's colleagues on the U.N. Gaza commission disagreed that any new information merited retraction of key elements of the report, and in a letter to the Guardian, inferred that all that had changed in the intervening period was that a weak-kneed (or hopelessly conflicted) Goldstone had come under political or social "pressure" from unspecified quarters to backtrack on the commission's findings.

As reported by Ha'aretz:

The Guardian rebuttal [by other commission team members] stated "calls to reconsider or even retract the report, as well as attempts at misrepresenting its nature and purpose, disregard the rights of victims, Palestinians and Israeli, to truth and justice."

The statement also addressed "personal attacks and the extraordinary pressure placed on members of the fact-finding mission," a seemingly thinly-veiled reference to pressure and criticism by many in Israel and the Jewish world on Goldstone, a South African Jew and self-described Zionist.

"Had we given in to pressures from any quarter to sanitize our conclusions, we would be doing a serious injustice to the hundreds of innocent civilians killed during the Gaza conflict, the thousands injured, and the hundreds of thousands whose lives continue to be deeply affected by the conflict and the blockade," the three wrote.

Unstated in the rebuttal, but clear from the New York Times report, is that the organized Jewish community and even members of his own Jewish Zionist family forced Goldstone's hand through a process of shunning, intimidation, browbeating, and social extortion.

Why would these people, including his own daughter, go to such tremendous lengths to denigrate and berate Goldstone until he relented? Putting all of the pieces together and holding them up next to Jewish religious law, it's clear they intended to make an example of Goldstone and drag him through the mud because he violated the Talmudic Jewish law against informing on fellow Jews, and thus, in the eyes of Jewry, was to be treated as a "moser" until he recanted his own commissions findings, or would never to be allowed back into the Jewish fold.

The Jewish encyclopedia defines "Moser" as follows:

An informer, denunciator, or delator; synonyms are "masor" (abstract, "mesirah"), "delator" (), and "malshin" (abstract, "malshinut"), from the last of which are derived the Portuguese "malsim," and also the Spanish "malsin," together with the adjective "malsinar" and the abstract nouns "malsindad" and "malsineria."

Nothing was more severely punished by the Jews than talebearing; and no one was held in greater contempt than the informer. On account of the fact that his deeds frequently caused mischief and even entailed death and destruction, the sages of the Talmud compared the "moser" to a serpent.

Thus, in the mind of the Jewish Zionist community (remember, Zionism is a Talmudic, Jewish supremacist formulation), Goldstone had become the equivalent of a "serpent" -- and had to be religously, socially and politically shunned and ostracized until broken.

To Jewry, Goldstone stands as an example of how Jews who become mosers should be treated until death, or until they recant their testimony (no matter how objective, correct, accurate or honest) against fellow Jews.

But how should non-Jews regard Goldstone and the Jewish Zionist milieu from which he came that compelled his de facto perjury and the betrayal of his official secular duties as a commissioned member of the U.N.?

Goldstone today stands as an example of why Jewish Zionists should never be given any official authority in a secular society or body that subscribes or aspires to an impartial judicial or justice system; indeed, he also stands as an example why Jewish Zionists (who at their ideological core regard non-Jews as animals), should never be given any secular judicial or governmental authority over the fate of any non-Jews whatsoever, as any time a Jew's interests come into conflict with those of a non-Jew, the Jew is commanded by the Law of Moser to side with his co-religionist.

As noted on the web site metatron, which compares the Talmudic Law of Moser to the Mafioso code of Omertŕ:

The Talmudic Law of the Moser, or Law of the Jewish Informer, is essentially a covenant prohibiting a Jew from informing on another Jew to a non-Jew directly or indirectly. Such a law is diametrically opposed to the adversarial process of our own legal system in the USA and therefore conducive toward obstruction of justice.

Furthermore, among all employees at all levels of our judicial, intelligence, law enforcement, military and news media communities, the Talmudic Law of the Moser, or Law of the Jewish Informer, constitutes an impediment to frank and uninhibited exchanges of information in the discharge of their duties and therefore poses a serious threat to our national security.

For example, the Talmudic Law of the Moser thwarts the discovery process when a judge or an attorney general chooses not to allow or pursue information or lines of inquiry that might expose a Jew in wrongdoing or with questionable interests in a case. Or, the Law of the Moser constitutes the foundation of a conspiracy of silence wherein intelligence that can be considered adverse to the Zionist state and its interests is filtered or otherwise withheld from analysts or others with a rightful need to know. Or, such a law requires a Jew to keep pertinent information about a crime from police investigators. The Talmudic Law of the Moser determines whether news that pertains to the Zionist state is "fit to print"; the question "is it good for Israel?" is the formula that is applied in case after case.

One cannot overemphasize the great importance of this very real issue of the Talmudic Law of the Moser, or Law of the Jewish Informer, the history of which can be read in the Jewish Encyclopedia.

But the Talmudic Law of the Moser is not just some historical curiosity out of the Middle Ages and the Jewish Diaspora. Indeed, this law is quite real and in effect today...

The effects of "The Law of Moser" can be seen all across contemporary American society, where Jewish Zionist cliques and networks increasingly disproportionately influence or predominate from mass media to Hollywood to Wall Street to Washington and the Supreme Court -- and see to it that their Jewish bretheren are given preferential treatment, or at the least are never called to the carpet or held accountable for their crimes, abuses or transgressions in front of "the Gentiles."

Moreover, the very presence of such a criminally cohesive, Mafiosa-like enterprise that institutionally practices such blatant and self-serving, religiously supremacist double standards in an ostensibly secular society is itself a recipe for the desruction of the very concept of secularism itself.

Why should any other religious or corporate organization play by the rules of temporal secularism and secular fair play, or relent to the authority of "secular" courts or governments when Zionist Jewry is allowed to play by a self-serving set Talmudic religious rules favorable to itself and pursuant to Jewish supremacy?

Perhaps, in the end, that's exactly what Zionist Jewry and its pseudo-"Christian" and pseudo-"secular" Gentile collaborators in America and elsewhere actually have in mind: the destruction of the secular order, and the establishment of a Jewish supremacist one.

Jews lie, Jews cheat, Jews steal. News? NO! They have been at it for three thousand years.


Goldstone Was Ostracized For Telling The Truth
After the report was published, after the flood of public hatred [ from Jews ], Richard Goldstone recanted somewhat; he did allege that some of what he had said was not totally justified. The Jews trumpeted this loud and clear. Why did he change? Richard Goldstone was leaned on big time. He breached their law of Mesirah, the law that the Mafia call Omerta, the code of silence. It says, in effect that being a Jew is more important than obeying the law. See Goldstone Was Ostracized tells us why.


Ariel Toaff ex Wiki - see Blood Libel for more and better details
Toaff's most recent book, Pasque di sangue. Ebrei d'Europa e omicidi rituali ("Passovers of Blood: The Jews of Europe and Ritual Murders"), was published in February 2007. The book analyzes the cultural and historical background to a notorious medieval trial regarding accusations of the ritual murder of a child by some Jews for the purposes of Passover, accusations which the consensus of scholarship [ Make that Jews, propagandists and main stream media hacks - Editor ]  has dismissed as a blood libel against Jews. The book sparked intense controversy, including calls for him to resign from or be fired from his professorship, the questioning of his research, historical method(s), and motives as they relate to his writing of the book, threats to his life, and demands that he be prosecuted.

Toaff promised not to give in to pressure and defend his work "even if crucified",, but he did pull his book from circulation. He clarified that in regard to the specific trial, dealing with Jews accused of killing Simon of Trent for ritual purposes at Passover, there was no relationship whatsoever between the so-called 'ritual of blood' and ritual infanticide. He denied that the Jews implicated were in any way involved in the murder. On February 14, 2007, Toaff said in a statement that he ordered the Italian publisher of his book to freeze distribution of his book so that he can "re-edit the passages which comprised the basis of the distortions and falsehoods that have been published in the media." A second edition of the book appeared in February, 2008. In an afterword to this edition in defence of his book, Toaff responded to his critics. To forestall possible misinterpretations, he said that the idea that Jews practiced ritual murder a slanderous stereotype, and that ritual homicide or infanticide was a myth. That said, the possibility existed that:

'certain criminal acts, disguised as crude rituals, were indeed committed by extremist groups or by individuals demented by religious mania and blinded by desire for revenge against those considered responsible for their people’s sorrows and tragedies.'

The evidence supporting this hypothesis draws on confessions extracted under torture. His book examines the strong documentary evidence in medieval medical handbooks that dried human blood, traded by both Jewish and Christian merchants, was thought to be medicinally efficacious. Under the stress of forced conversions, expulsions and massacres, Toaff thinks it possible that in certain Ashkenazi groups dried human blood came to play a magical role in calling down God's vengeance on Christians, the historic persecutors of the Jews, and that this reaction may have affected certain forms of ritual practice among a restricted number of Ashkenazi Jews during Passover.
This is a mish mash of lies, half truths, half lies and omissions published by the Wiki which was set up by Jews.


Bernie Madoff or see Bernie Madoff ex Wiki
Bernard Lawrence "Bernie" Madoff (born April 29, 1938) is a former American stock broker, investment advisor, non-executive chairman of the NASDAQ stock market, and the admitted operator of what has been described as the largest Ponzi scheme in the history of the world.

In March 2009, Madoff pleaded guilty to 11 federal felonies and admitted to turning his wealth management business into a massive Ponzi scheme that defrauded thousands of investors of billions of dollars. Madoff said he began the Ponzi scheme in the early 1990s. However, federal investigators believe the fraud began as early as the 1970s, and those charged with recovering the missing money believe the investment operation may never have been legitimate. The amount missing from client accounts, including fabricated gains, was almost $65 billion. The court-appointed trustee estimated actual losses to investors of $18 billion. On June 29, 2009, he was sentenced to 150 years in prison, the maximum allowed.
Stealing $65 billion is rather impressive and rather useless. You can't really spend that much on yourself.
PS Madoff got away with it as long as he did because financially sophisticated Jews kept quiet about his thieving - see Jews call it mesirah - The Mafia [ - ] call it Omerta -