Sarah Champion

Sarah Champion is the Member of Parliament for Rotherham. It is her duty to represent her constituents regardless of which party they voted for. She does not. She did not. She has no intention of doing so. Her duty clearly includes protecting English girls against being Raped by Pakistani Perverts. She was in a position to make the Police take action or, at the very least pretend that were doing something about major crime. She might allege that she knew nothing. In that she follows Denis MacShane, the previous MP, a thief whose modus operandi is fraud. This is a woman who alleges that White men are the main culprits nationwide.

The Wikipedia wrote her up, claiming that she cares about children - see Sarah Champion ex Wiki. The reality is different. Pandering to Pakistani Perverts is her style. Votes ride on it. So does Vote Rigging. Given that the Labour Party is systematically betraying the honest English working man they need Pakistani votes to keep power. See what she has to say for herself at her Website. Her story! Perverts? Children? Does she care? Not enough to take effective action. Banning all foreigners from taxi driving would be good start but the deputy council leader, Jahangir Akhtar drives one. Oh well, forget that idea. For some idea about how bad it is ask Rotherham Election Result Gave Her An Increased Majority after presiding over mass rape and claiming total ignorance. 
PS Champion & two other Labour MPs have decided to sue Jane Collins, the local MEP, alleging that they knew nothing about the  Pakistani Perverts who were busy Raping some 1,400 English girls in  Rotherham. Will a jury be stupid enough to believe her? I wouldn't. The others are John Healey and Kevin Barron.

Rotherham Election Result Follow Up
QUOTE
Now that the smoke has cleared somewhat after Britain’s election there is one result that should be absorbed by anyone who cares about the future of the West. The Labour MP for Rotherham, a woman who presided over a vast child rape epidemic and noticed nothing, was re-elected with a substantially increased majority.

After months of lurid media coverage, after the exposure of the local Labour establishment, the resignation of the entire Labour council, the sacking of Labour-appointed culpable officials,  when no-one in the entire local Labour establishment could pretend they did not know what was going on, Sarah Champion was still able to pull in nearly twice as much as her closest rival, a UKIP candidate.

This is a woman who consorts with Muslim politicians who still deny the child rape epidemic. Her only response  was to say that White men are the main culprits nationwide. For those who say that the only thing between us and a White awakening is a free media, it is a fact worth pondering over for a moment.
UNQUOTE
So take the point that Sarah Champion is a Traitor, an enemy of England. The Wikipedia write up conceals the truth about her. Accident or design? Try the latter. See what Champion has to say at White men are the main culprits then decide whether she is an evasive, crooked liar determined to ignore extensive Pakistani crime or merely a normal politician.
PS Andrew Neil in his interview quotes the Jew, Jack Straw saying that Pakistani Rapists See White Girls As Easy Meat. That was back in 2011. Nothing was done about it then. That is Treason too.

 

Sarah Champion ex Wiki
Child sexual exploitation
In November 2013, it was announced that Champion, in partnership with children’s charity Barnardos, would lead a cross-party inquiry to investigate the effectiveness of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 in tackling child sexual exploitation and trafficking within the UK.[12]

In April 2014 a report was published by Champion and Barnardos calling on the Government to toughen up laws that protect children from being groomed by predatory sex offenders. It recommended a legal loophole be closed which would allow police to step in sooner if they suspect a child of being groomed for sex.[13]

 


Rotherham Ratbag Bills Us For Remembrance Day Poppy [ 15 March 2015 ]
QUOTE
A Labour MP is to repay expenses after claiming the cost of a poppy wreath to honour the war dead on Remembrance Day.

Sarah Champion admitted the claim 'should never have been made' and will return the £17 to the expenses watchdog this week.

The MP, who was the star of a documentary about life in the Commons, billed the taxpayer for the tribute last November.
UNQUOTE
Greedy, corrupt & doubtless denying all knowledge of Paedophile perverts

 

Rotherham MP Campaigning Against Sexual Exploitation - Allegedly [ 3 May 2015 ]
QUOTE
WHEN I was elected as the MP for Rotherham in November 2012 my motivation for standing was to give a voice to society's most vulnerable, so I knew that addressing child abuse should be my top priority.
UNQUOTE
Sarah Champion was in Rotherham from 1992 to 1994 & from 2008 onwards but it seems that she knew nothing about what was being done to English girls by Pakistani Perverts. Now she wants to be re-elected as the MP she talks the talk. Will she walk the walk? Maybe, just maybe. The Pakistanis wanted one of theirs as MP. They got nasty about it. Business as usual? Believe it.

 

Rotherham Voted Labour After Letting Pakistanis Rape 14 Hundred English Girls [ 9 May 2015 ]
Sarah Champion Labour 19,860
Jane Collins UK Independence Party 11,414
Sebastian Lowe Conservative 4,656
Janice Middleton Liberal Democrat 1,093
Dean Walker English Democrats 166
The protest vote went to UKIP. All of the Pakistanis will have voted Labour. The Labour candidate Sarah Champion said she was working against Paedophile perversion. What did she do against Pakistani Perverts?  Not a lot. Actually it was worse; more a determination to see nothing.

 

Rotherham Election Result Follow Up [ 10 May 2015 ]
QUOTE
Now that the smoke has cleared somewhat after Britain’s election there is one result that should be absorbed by anyone who cares about the future of the West. The Labour MP for Rotherham, a woman who presided over a vast child rape epidemic and noticed nothing, was re-elected with a substantially increased majority.

After months of lurid media coverage, after the exposure of the local Labour establishment, the resignation of the entire Labour council, the sacking of Labour-appointed culpable officials,  when no-one in the entire local Labour establishment could pretend they did not know what was going on, Sarah Champion was still able to pull in nearly twice as much as her closest rival, a UKIP candidate.

 

Rotherham MP Alleges That Pakistani Women Have Been Threatened With Rape [ 31 October 2015 ]
QUOTE
Verbal abuse and threats of rape have been levelled at young Asian women in Rotherham, an MP has said [ stated/claimed/alleged - delete to taste ].

Sarah Champion, the Rotherham Central MP, made the remarks in a BBC debate on how the town should move on after a report on child sexual exploitation.

But South Yorkshire Police said while reports of abuse directed at Asian people had increased, incidents of violence had not.
UNQUOTE
Sarah Champion contrived to know nothing and do nothing while 1,400 English girls were being Raped & abused by Pakistani Perverts in Rotherham. Now she is keen on alleging that Englishmen are guilty. She is, at best one of Lenin's Useful Idiots. This not to say for a moment that she was the most incompetent/ignorant/corrupt Racist official who was eagerly Perverting The Course Of Justice for the benefit of Third World aliens.
PS The South Yorkshire Police alleged that they were investigating but they were determined to let the perpetrators get away it because they are Pakistani.

 

Rotherham MP Pretends To Care About Pakistani Perverts Raping English Girls [ 26 December 2015 ]
QUOTE
A Roterham [ sic ] MP is calling for people who sexually exploit older teenagers to receive tougher sentences because 16 and 17-year-olds are still children.

Sarah Champion said the capacity of older teenagers to consent to sex could be ‘impaired through an imbalance of power between a child and a perpetrator’, as well as by drugs or alcohol.

And she called on Government to help raise awareness of the vulnerability of older teenagers, who were ‘treated like adults and not afforded the additional protections given in law to younger children’.
UNQUOTE
Champion alleges that she knew nothing about the 1400  English girls being raped by Pakistani Perverts in Rotherham. She is even suing for [ alleged ] Libel. Feminists tell us that Fat Is a Feminist Issue but they go very quiet when English girls are being Raped by Third World thugs.

 

Sarah Champion Alleged Knowing Nothing Before 2014
QUOTE
I thought Sarah didn’t know until August 2014?
Yet here she is, displaying her detailed knowledge and understanding of the Child exploitation scandal?

Did she not win a libel case, on the grounds she did not know, until August 2014?

If readers have an explanation for this discrepancy, we would love to hear it?

Hansard 12 Sep 2013 : Column 1231

children. We cannot afford to have voluntary sector organisations become so frightened about what they can and cannot do and so unsure about how to raise suspicions that they pack it all in. A little bit of knowledge can made a difference to the life of a child. Rather than merely saying that each organisation should have a child protection officer in place, we should be making available the training to ensure that all those who work with children know the signs and the next steps to take.

I see my constituents who lovingly give up their time to work with children, and that little bit of attention can make all the difference to a shy child. It can help with their education and make them feel loved. We should ensure that the voluntary sector has all the help and support it needs to help and support children. This House shines better when we agree on issues. Today we all agree on this, and we will agree on a strategy. I urge everyone to put their shoulders to the plough and see that we get the work done for the safety and protection of child and adult alike.
2.41 pm
Sarah Champion (Rotherham) (Lab): I start by echoing everything my colleagues on both sides of the House have said and hope that the Government will listen to our recommendations, because there is so much agreement on the themes that have been discussed and the changes that need to be made.
I am hugely proud to be the MP for Rotherham. The town has an esteemed industrial history, a strong sense of community and many reasons to proclaim its civic pride. We have a multitude of success stories in manufacturing and small business, as well as three leading further education colleges. However, for some time a shadow has been cast across the town in the form of persistent allegations of failures by key institutions to protect our children. The allegations have been coupled with prosecutions for child sexual exploitation in the town.
The term “child sexual exploitation” is used to cover a broad range of illegal activity, from seemingly consensual relationships or informal exchanges of sex for attention, gifts or cigarettes through to very serious organised crime. Young people can be subject to physical and sexual violence and can be put at risk of unwanted pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases. Their families can suffer threats, violence and significant psychological distress, disruption and even fragmentation.
Peer-on-peer child sexual exploitation happens too and can take various forms. For example, young people are sometimes used to “recruit” others by inviting them to parties where they will then be introduced to adults or forced to perform sexual acts on adults. Technology can also play a significant role, with young people being cajoled into using mobile technology as a way of distributing images of abuse.
It is vital to understand that both perpetrators and victims can come from a variety of ethnic and cultural backgrounds. Child sexual exploitation is not a crime restricted to British Pakistani males or white British girls, despite the media coverage of high-profile cases. Indeed, recent findings have highlighted the fact that girls of Asian origin are frequently the subjects of this heinous crime themselves.
12 Sep 2013 : Column 1232

There is also a perception that child sexual exploitation only affects children in care. Looked-after children do account for a disproportionate number of the victims of sexual exploitation and can be particularly vulnerable. An estimated 20% to 25% of victims are looked-after children, with only 1% of the child population being in care. However, the majority of children who are exploited are still living at home when it happens.
Another false perception is that it only affects young women. In truth, boys and young men are also targeted. The full extent is not known as boys, in particular, are highly reluctant to come forward. Nevertheless, one in 10 of the young people receiving support from Barnardo’s for this crime are boys, and in some services the proportion is significantly higher.
It is also important to acknowledge that women can be perpetrators of this crime. For example, in a case currently being tried in Sheffield the alleged gang leader is a woman. Although such examples are rare, it is more common that female involvement is in facilitating the abuse. The inquiry led by the Office of the Children’s Commissioner found that when women and girls were identified as perpetrators, their role was primarily, although not exclusively, to procure victims. The sad and hidden truth behind such activity is that there is often a cycle of abuse at work, with many of those women and girls having been sexually exploited themselves.
There are no reliable figures for the total number of children experiencing sexual exploitation. The collection of data is a huge issue and there is no standardised system for data collection, something on which the Home Affairs Committee has made several recommendations. However, child sexual exploitation is being unearthed wherever it is being investigated. Further work by the Government is required to determine the full extent of the problem. In addition, the importance of all agencies sharing information in the interests of child safeguarding must be addressed. Currently, children are vulnerable because information is not always shared between them. We must move away from the excuse of confidentiality when it comes to protecting children. A child’s safety must be the priority.
Much has been written in the press about how Rotherham is not doing enough to protect its young people from this horrendous crime. I can assure the House that since being elected I have worked closely with South Yorkshire police and Rotherham metropolitan borough council to find out whether our young people are getting the protection they deserve. It is totally inaccurate to say that Rotherham is doing nothing to prevent this crime and prosecute abusers. Although more can always be done, and by the council’s own admission it has not handled historical cases well, I now believe that there is a commitment and drive by the services in Rotherham to protect every child, and I welcome the fact that the council has commissioned an independent inquiry.
Lisa Nandy: I am grateful to my hon. Friend for giving way despite the short time available. I just want to reflect on the fact that sometimes it is the areas that have experienced these horrific crimes that are getting to grips with the problem and becoming leaders in dealing with it. Perhaps a lesson for the House and for Ministers is that we need to look closely at those areas
12 Sep 2013 : Column 1233

where such awful cases have not come to light and ensure that they are doing the same things that my hon. Friend talks about in relation to her constituency.

Sarah Champion: I appreciate my hon. Friend making that case. As I have mentioned, wherever we look we find such crimes, but a lot of people are not looking, and that is my worry.
It is important that services are open to external scrutiny and are accountable to the people they serve. From my research, it seems clear that the only way to tackle child sexual exploitation is by services working collaboratively. The key focus must be on preventing, protecting and pursuing: preventing young people from becoming a victim; protecting those who show signs of being at risk of becoming a victim; and pursuing those who commit such horrific crimes. Realistically, local authorities, the police, the voluntary sector and health and education services all need to share their experience, data and resources if they are effectively to tackle and prevent this crime.
Rotherham works collaboratively. Its child sexual exploitation service includes specialist child abuse police officers, social workers, specialist health workers, parents, youth workers and voluntary sector representatives. Its aim is to reduce sexual exploitation through deterrence and prosecution, and it significantly enhances the effectiveness of all agencies through joint information sharing, planning of assessments and investigations. I am pleased that Rotherham has adopted that working method but extremely concerned that it is not a requirement across the country. The current situation means that whether a local area has a good support team is genuinely a postcode lottery. That is not good enough, because it means that children are being put at risk unnecessarily. I urge the Government to make multi-agency safeguarding hubs a requirement in every area.
I have spoken about data collection, collaborative working and statutory requirements, but what this debate is really about is children and young people being abused. The effect of sexual exploitation on a child or young person can be long term and highly damaging. It can lead to difficulties in making and sustaining relationships with others, feelings of worthlessness and shame, loss of confidence and low self-esteem. It is essential that we always remember the victims of these crimes and do all that we can to support them. These are young people whose childhood has been stolen from them, and their future, if handled incorrectly, could be damaged too.
We need to ensure that the process of addressing the crime does not become another form of abuse. I was horrified to find out that a Rotherham victim had been on the stand for seven weeks during the court process. That is unimaginable to me, and it should never be allowed to happen. The victims should automatically be given counselling and as much support as they require. Indeed, I would extend that to ensure that the whole family received support, as the damage caused by this crime can spread widely.
On a personal level, I am interested in determining whether existing legislation is appropriate for tackling the crime, and I will be working with Barnardo’s on this topic in the coming months. I am also supporting the campaign led by Paula Barrow and assisted by the @Mandatenow coalition calling for a “Daniel’s law”, which would make it mandatory for professionals working
12 Sep 2013 : Column 1234

with children to report signs of possible abuse. As my colleagues have mentioned, four-year-old Daniel Pelka was starved and beaten over a period of months before his death. Staff, teaching assistants and others at his school observed his desperate attempts to forage for food, his severe weight loss and the numerous bruises and injuries he suffered. There is currently no legal requirement for anyone working with children in the UK to report suspected or known abuse either to the appropriate local authority officer or to the police. Without such a law in place to support staff and protect children, effective safeguarding will never be achieved. However, this is not only the responsibility of professionals. Local communities play an essential part in identifying not only those at risk but those who have the potential to commit these crimes. We all have a duty of care to be diligent and to report suspicious behaviour to the police. Unless we do so, this vile crime will continue unchecked.

2.50 pm
UNQUOTE
She wanted power, she needed votes. Pandering to Pakistanis, pandering to Paedophiles, pandering to Vote Riggers is how it is done.

 

Labour Shadow Domestic Violence Minister Beat Up Her Husband [ 25 September 2016 ]
QUOTE
Labour’s shadow minister for domestic abuse was once arrested and cautioned nearly a decade ago over a violent bust-up with her husband. Rotherham MP Sarah Champion, 47, is understood to have hit her then husband Graham Hoyland, 59, with a framed painting during a heated argument over their divorce.

The incident in 2007 saw police officers arrest the couple at their £460,000, family home in leafy Chapel-en-Frith, Derbyshire, and took them in to police custody........ Both Miss Champion, a vocal campaigner against domestic abuse, and Mr Hoyland, a best-selling author and mountaineer, received police cautions..........

In 2012, she was elected as MP for Rotherham and was promoted to Jeremy Corbyn’s frontbench as Shadow Home Office minister for preventing abuse and domestic violence.
UNQUOTE
Champion cares deeply about women & girls being victimised in Rotherham - apart from the 1,400 that were Raped by Pakistani Perverts. They were the quid pro quo for industrial scale Vote Rigging, which kept Labour in power.

 

Rotherham MP Explains How To Protect Children's Innocence [ 3 November 2016 ]
Sarah Champion, Rotherham's wonderful MP achieved absolute ignorance of the Pakistani Perverts who raped 1,400 English girls in her constituency. Now she tells us how to care for our children's Moral welfare.
PS Labour HAD to bribe Pakistanis for their help in massive Vote Rigging after betraying English Working Men and their daughters.

Champion is just as much a ratbag on the make, an enemy of the Working Class as Jo Cox.